Comments on: Obama & Right-Wing Conspiracy Theorists
New Republic: Why Anti-Obama Hate Will Be Different Than Anti-Clinton Hate
Add a Comment See all 59 Comments
- Centerfall94,
While you may not have used those terms, you did say "Bitter much? Loser? Try clutching that gun and crucifix more. Not that it will help but it will entertain me. LOL! Loser!".
Admittedly you did not say these words to me, but to some brainless right-wing twit, but there are a number of representatives of your part of the political spectrum that do use that language.
Posted by ausus at 12:00 AM
Yea, I have no idea what you''re talking about now. You said "racist, nazi, fascist", and I didn''t say those things. Calling someone a loser and bitter is clearly not even close to the same thing, and you can do whatever you want. Enjoy. - Reply to this comment
- Centerfall94,
While you may not have used those terms, you did say "Bitter much? Loser? Try clutching that gun and crucifix more. Not that it will help but it will entertain me. LOL! Loser!".
Admittedly you did not say these words to me, but to some brainless right-wing twit, but there are a number of representatives of your part of the political spectrum that do use that language. - Reply to this comment
- Hinnis says he doesn''t believe the Supreme Court has the guts to adjudicate Obama''s citizenship status. Joe Biden said, rather cryptically, that there would be a major challenge in the first few months of Obama''s presidency. Could this be it? Could he not be eligible? I am a conservative but I''m afraid that in this case the cure could be worse than the disease. Apparently the Supreme Court is also afraid. I agree with hinnis.
- Reply to this comment
- Centerfall94,
Triumphalism is as bad as being a sore loser.
I have no doubt that Obama won and to disqualify him now on a technicality would be an injustice.
That said, he will be subject to scrutiny over the next four years and I would hope that his supporters would not resort to phrases like racist, Fascist and Nazi when questions are raised about his policies or judgment.
Posted by ausus at 11:47 PM
Obama isn''t even sworn in yet. After eight years of the torture that was the Bush administration, I figure I''m entitled to a little celebration. ;) That''s my choice.
And regarding racist, fascist, and Nazi, I didn''t say those things. Not sure why you''re applying it to me. - Reply to this comment
- Centerfall94,
Triumphalism is as bad as being a sore loser.
I have no doubt that Obama won and to disqualify him now on a technicality would be an injustice.
That said, he will be subject to scrutiny over the next four years and I would hope that his supporters would not resort to phrases like racist, Fascist and Nazi when questions are raised about his policies or judgment. - Reply to this comment
- Obama''''s father was not a US citizen, only his mother... A "natural born citizen " as defined by the constitution consists of having a father and mother who both are US citizens at the time of birth AND being born on US soil. Also you can not have dual citizenship at birth. because of split loyalties..
Obama should have know this... In fact he does know but I think he thinks he can change the rules (the constitution of the US) - Reply to this comment
- LOL! Hinnis wants us to believe he didn''t vote for Bush and was a Democrat and now he questions Senator Obama''s birth certificate!
This is Saturday Night Live material! Not as good as parodies of the Witch of Wasalia using her own words, though. 8-) - Reply to this comment
- No, Sparks, although I know you''d like to think that. I opposed Bush from the beginning. I couldn''t wait until he was out of office. Little did I know that the Democrats (of which I was one) would nominate a fraudulent and deceptive candidate like Obama. By the way, Sparks, please give me one good reason why Obama refuses to disclose his complete birth certificate to the American people. Thank you for your cooperation.
- Reply to this comment
- hinnis,
You voted for George W Bush.
Isn''t that all we really need to know about you? - Reply to this comment
- "...And YES WE CAN means Marxists like Castro, Chavez and Obama CAN fool people."
Posted by hinnis
Don''t forget Eisenhower. - Reply to this comment
- Americans were FOOLED.
Posted by hinnis at 11:10 PM
Bitter much? Loser? Try clutching that gun and crucifix more. Not that it will help but it will entertain me. LOL! Loser! - Reply to this comment
- Americans were FOOLED. Almost everything about Obama is FAKE, including possibly his birth certificate. The Obama image was manufactured by a very expensive campaign, financed with hundreds of millions of dollars, donated largely by U.S. enemies such as George Soros. We can%u2019t trust mainstream media. They hid important facts and presented only the Obama image they wanted Americans to buy. In spite of media effort to hide facts, it%u2019s obvious that, like his parents, mentors, relatives, friends and associates, Obama is a Marxist who hates America. Brainwashed by the media, Americans became as foolish as the most ignorant Venezuelans, Bolivians and Ecuadorians who believed in CHANGE and YES WE CAN and now see that CHANGE means change toward Marxism, loss of freedom and rights, and greater poverty, despair and corruption. And YES WE CAN means Marxists like Castro, Chavez and Obama CAN fool people.
- Reply to this comment
- What''s this? The loser neocons think that Senator and President-Elect Barack Obama isn''t a United States citizen!??!? LOL
BAHAHAHAA!
Thanks for the fun! - Reply to this comment
- "The greatest prosperity enjoyed by the post-World War II US was during the Eisenhower administration."
Posted by ausus
That%u2019s actually true,
Eisenhower knew better than to try to dismantle FDR%u2019s policies. We had strong labor unions, a progressive income tax, and banking regulations.
Regan began the tax burden shift under the guise of %u201Ctax cuts%u201D and %u201Cjob creation%u201D.
If Eisenhower were to run for president today he would have been labeled a left wing socialist. - Reply to this comment
- sparks224,
What was the state of the US economy when President Reagan took office? Does the term "stagflation" ring a bell?
The greatest prosperity enjoyed by the post-World War II US was during the Eisenhower administration. - Reply to this comment
- The Conservatives are out of gas.
Now that Reaganomics has been exposed as nothing more than an upward redistribution scheme.
I almost feel sorry for them. - Reply to this comment
- Fairflight: I have a sinking feeling that the reason the Supreme Court is discussing these cases in early December is not to actually consider a ruling on them, but to figure out a way to prevent them from being considered. Up until now, each of these cases has been dismissed before they got off the ground on the basis of "standing," i.e. the court decided that we citizens to not have the right to questions Obama''s eligibility for the Presidency. However, a big problem for the courts is on the horizon, and that is the Alan Keyes case. Because the case is being brought by Alan Keyes (a Presidential candidate in California), and an elector from the electoral college in California, it will be difficult for the court to dismiss their case on the basis of standing. Therefore, I believe they will fashion an opinion which precludes any success on the part of Keyes, et al. I hope I am wrong, but I don''t believe any court has the guts to adjudicate this issue, including the Supreme Court.
- Reply to this comment
- I must confess, I do enjoy watching the wing-nuts heads explode over the Obama election.
- Reply to this comment
- I think it is interesting and telling that main stream media can write facts off as nothing more than PARANOIA when in fact they have completely failed at revealing the facts! On Dec.5 2008..All 9 Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States will meet in a docketed, closed session to determine whether or not there is indeed a Constitutional crisis in the making! I am sure they were not paranoid when THEY decided that this was important enough for all 9 to decide on...yet the Media has failed in every aspect to alert the public to this historical event! I hope you have developed a flavor for crow because my hunch is you will be eating a lot of it in the very near future! Don''t choke!
- Reply to this comment
- ou have to understand the difference between a %u201CCertification of Live Birth%u201D and a %u201CCertificate of Live Birth%u201D. The link below shows the Obama%u2019s %u201CCertification of Live Birth%u201D on the left and the %u201CCertificate of Live Birth%u201D for a real Hawaiian citizen on the right. http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_iKcZ3qcCmyo/SSrfxldwhuI/AAAAAAAALMQ/ga339VEByNs/s1600-h/2BObirth.jpg Dr. ****** was very specific to say %u201Coriginal%u201D birth certificate; there was no mention as to the country of origin or any inference that it was Hawaiian. http://hawaii.gov/health/about/pr/2008/08-93.pdf In addition, at that time, Hawaii allowed persons not born in Hawaii to register their birth; much like today. http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol06_ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.HTM Finally, Obama has spent much money (estimates of $500,000) for lawyers, websites, and the like to hide something that $12 would release. Can anyone think of one good reason why he goes to such great lengths to keep this information from the American public?
- Reply to this comment
