Comments on: If Obama Loses, Don't Assume Racism

The New Republic: We Must Confront The Fact That Race Is Not The Only Reason Obama Could Lose

[dustymag]

Wow.. Could you make your article more difficult to comprehend with more references and articulation that makes no sense? The fact is, if you had anything CLEAR to say, you would express it in a way that didn''t celebrate your vocabulary, but actually presented a point. The ability to turn a phrase will never replace actual meaning. After all, if your reader has to pause to comprehend what you''re trying to say, then you are delinquent in your mission to communicate. See Strunk... Please!
I hope I''ve made this flowery enough for you to understand, oh Wise CBS News Guy. Do you talk like this? Or, just snicker when you collect the paycheck?

[dustymag]

Wow.. Could you make your article more difficult to comprehend with more references and articulation that makes no sense? The fact is, if you had anything CLEAR to say, you would express it in a way that didn''t celebrate your vocabulary, but actually presented a point. The ability to turn a phrase will never replace actual meaning. After all, if your reader has to pause to comprehend what you''re trying to say, then you are delinquent in your mission to communicate. See Strunk... Please!
I hope I''ve made this flowery enough for you to understand, oh Wise CBS News Guy. Do you talk like this? Or, just snicker when you collect the paycheck?

[dustymag]

Wow.. Could you make your article more difficult to comprehend with more references and articulation that makes no sense? The fact is, if you had anything CLEAR to say, you would express it in a way that didn''t celebrate your vocabulary, but actually presented a point. The ability to turn a phrase will never replace actual meaning. After all, if your reader has to pause to comprehend what you''re trying to say, then you are delinquent in your mission to communicate. See Strunk... Please!
I hope I''ve made this flowery enough for you to understand, oh Wise CBS News Guy. Do you talk like this? Or, just snicker when you collect the paycheck?

[dustymag]

Wow.. Could you make your article more difficult to comprehend with more references and articulation that makes no sense? The fact is, if you had anything CLEAR to say, you would express it in a way that didn''t celebrate your vocabulary, but actually presented a point. The ability to turn a phrase will never replace actual meaning. After all, if your reader has to pause to comprehend what you''re trying to say, then you are delinquent in your mission to communicate. See Strunk... Please!
I hope I''ve made this flowery enough for you to understand, oh Wise CBS News Guy. Do you talk like this? Or, just snicker when you collect the paycheck?

[dustymag]

Wow.. Could you make your article more difficult to comprehend with more references and articulation that makes no sense? The fact is, if you had anything CLEAR to say, you would express it in a way that didn''t celebrate your vocabulary, but actually presented a point. The ability to turn a phrase will never replace actual meaning. After all, if your reader has to pause to comprehend what you''re trying to say, then you are delinquent in your mission to communicate. See Strunk... Please!
I hope I''ve made this flowery enough for you to understand, oh Wise CBS News Guy. Do you talk like this? Or, just snicker when you collect the paycheck?

[dustymag]

Wow.. Could you make your article more difficult to comprehend with more references and articulation that makes no sense? The fact is, if you had anything CLEAR to say, you would express it in a way that didn''t celebrate your vocabulary, but actually presented a point. The ability to turn a phrase will never replace actual meaning. After all, if your reader has to pause to comprehend what you''re trying to say, then you are delinquent in your mission to communicate. See Strunk... Please!
I hope I''ve made this flowery enough for you to understand, oh Wise CBS News Guy. Do you talk like this? Or, just snicker when you collect the paycheck?

[dustymag]

Wow.. Could you make your article more difficult to comprehend with more references and articulation that makes no sense? The fact is, if you had anything CLEAR to say, you would express it in a way that didn''t celebrate your vocabulary, but actually presented a point. The ability to turn a phrase will never replace actual meaning. After all, if your reader has to pause to comprehend what you''re trying to say, then you are delinquent in your mission to communicate. See Strunk... Please!
I hope I''ve made this flowery enough for you to understand, oh Wise CBS News Guy. Do you talk like this? Or, just snicker when you collect the paycheck?

[dustymag]

Wow.. Could you make your article more difficult to comprehend with more references and articulation that makes no sense? The fact is, if you had anything CLEAR to say, you would express it in a way that didn''t celebrate your vocabulary, but actually presented a point. The ability to turn a phrase will never replace actual meaning. After all, if your reader has to pause to comprehend what you''re trying to say, then you are delinquent in your mission to communicate. See Strunk... Please!
I hope I''ve made this flowery enough for you to understand, oh Wise CBS news guy. Do you talk like this? Or, just snicker when you collect the paycheck?

[dustymag]

Wow.. Could you make your article more difficult to comprehend with more references and articulation that makes no sense? The fact is, if you had anything CLEAR to say, you would express it in a way that didn''t celebrate your vocabulary, but actually presented a point. The ability to turn a phrase will never replace actual meaning. After all, if your reader has to pause to comprehend what you''re trying to say, then you are delinquent in your mission to communicate. See Strunk... Please.
I hope I''ve made this flowery enough for you to understand, oh Wise CBS news guy. Do you talk like this? Or, just snicker when you collect the paycheck?

[dustymag]

Wow.. Could you make your article more difficult to comprehend with more references and articulation that makes no sense? The fact is, if you had anything CLEAR to say, you would express it in a way that didn''t celebrate your vocabulary, but actually presented a point. The ability to turn a phrase will never replace actual meaning. After all, if your reader has to pause to comprehend what you''re trying to say, then you are delinquent in your mission to communicate. See Strunk... Please.
I hope I''ve made this flowery enough for you to understand, oh Wise CBS news guy. Do you talk like this? Or, just snicker when you collect the paycheck?