Comments on: On Sex-Ed Ad, McCain Is Right
National Review Online: What Was That Illinois Sex-Education Bill Really About?
- This article is typical example of what one can expect from NRO. As a victim of abuse at the age of 11 by a priest I can tell you that I wish I would have had some sort of education that would have helped tell me what to do. I did not and I cannot begin to explain the agony I went through. I was terrified and did not know where to turn as I was told that no one would believe me. You tight arsed republicans need to get your minds out of the gutter and realize that educating your kids about s e x is not going to cause them to become s e x fiends. How can you expect kids to know how to react when you refuse to equip them with the knowledge necessary to access the situation. I read the bill and thought it was very well written and that it would probably help lots of kids. The add in question tries to lead us to believe that Obama is in favor of teaching 5 year olds how to use condoms before teaching them how to read. How ridicilous. One other thing. Many years later I learned that my brother who is 6 years younger than I was also was molested by the same priest. I was in my late 40''s when I learned this. He, too, did not know what to do. Some knowledge would have been helpful.
- Reply to this comment
- The repugs can''t seem to understand the meaning of "appropriate to the various grade levels", as clearly stated in the bill! The NRO LIED, the McCain campaign LIED, + McCain lies every effing day! Show him video of himself saying something and he''ll claim "I didn''t say that!"
The repugs are caught by their short hairs and they know it! All the NRO has left is LIES, DAMM LIES, AND DANGEROUS DELUSIONS.
McCain: He doesn''t know NOTHIN'' about the economy! He was against torture (doesn''t work) before he was for it (it''s popular with re.tards). He was against offshore drilling before he was for it. (After the oil companies donated to his campaign!) He was a "maverick" who wanted "reform" before he kissed Bush''s derriere, then he was against it! Now is "for it" again, claiming to be the "real agent of change"! How can he bring change or "reform" to the government he''s been PART OF for decades?
Palin''s another big LIAR!
She was absolutely FOR the "bridge to nowhere" until it became too unpopular. She is such a "great leader" that she left her tiny city hugely in debt when her term as mayor ended, even though she hired lobbyists to get lots of pork for her city. Her idea of saving money was to make r.a.p.e victims pay for their own "r.a.p.e kits"! She is a lun.atic "end-timer" who will "bring back Jesus by ending the world". If you want your kids to die, if you want your friends and neighbors to all die, if you want the world to end... then vote for Palin/McCain! - Reply to this comment
- All you have to do to settle the issue is go to the exact language of the law as it applies to kindergarten. What is so hard about that? But I have to read the law as drafted for myself since NRO is NEVER known to be objective, factual and truthful. I doubt NRO will make an exception this time. Especially, not in an election year. As for McCain, he has lied so many times he''s giving Bush a run for the money as far as who is being a bigger liar.
- Reply to this comment
- "Soetoro,...never!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by BARRYLIES
Your racist BS don''t cut it--but go collect your toaster from the McCain campaign!! - Reply to this comment
- Anybody who did any research on this at all knows that the ad was correct!! Unfortunately, Obama''s supporters are "Low information" voters, if they can''t get it on his website, they don''t believe it to be true!! The media is getting ridiculous, when they are reporting about Sarah Palins tanning habits but fail to report about Obama?Soetoro''s Logan Act violations:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/john-stephenson/2008/09/16/why-media-ignoring-accusations-obama-interfered-iraq-withdrawal-neg
And what about this FEDERAL LAWSUIT?
www.obamacrimes.com
It appears that little Barry Soetoro, Indonesian citizen will have to prove he is eligible in Federal Court!! UH-OH!! The race card won''t work in court little Barry!! LMAO!!
McCain/Palin 08
Hillary 2012
Soetoro,...never!! - Reply to this comment
- Sarah Palin''s daughter is preggie. There seems to be a *** ed gap in the Palin household.
"No, no, honey, when I said it was Jesus who brings babies, I didn''t mean you could screw Mr. Redneck Backwoods without birth control!" - Reply to this comment
- Posted by paris1969 at 07:02 PM : Sep 16, 2008
You''re delerious. Get help. - Reply to this comment
- And like so many times before .. the same Media people who called McCain a liar .. including the ranting women on the View ... will not retract their comments even though they are aware that they were wrong!!
NOBAMA ... NOT NOW, NOT EVER!! - Reply to this comment
- kevsan1 I don''t get your comment. What is wrong with this bill. Do you think the just say no approach is working?
- Reply to this comment
- Looks like Obama has the votes of folks who both can''t read AND comprehend. Very scary for our nation. Byron York and Sen. Martinez have it correct.
- Reply to this comment
"The fact is, the bill%u2019s intention was to mandate that issues like contraception and the prevention of sexually-transmitted diseases be included in ***-education classes for children before the sixth grade, and as early as kindergarten."
I can''t believe I read the whole thing. So what''s his point? What else would they teach in s e x education classes? Knitting? I''d venture to guess that if the writer didn''t have so many s e xual hang ups this wouldn''t bother him at all. NRO... wrong again.- Reply to this comment
- I''m from Illinois, and a woman. Waiting until Grade 6 is TOO LONG. I hit puberty in grade 5, and puberty is the experation date for when this type of educatuin needs to have started. The age needed to be lowered. The average age of puberty is dropping, it''s a medical fact, and laws need to be updated to reflect this.
- Reply to this comment




