Comments on: Hillary Clinton, Please Exit With Dignity

The Nation: She Should Drop Out Of The Race On June 4

[b-easy63]

More of your inelligent critcal analysis? Figures! Just mind boggling the intelligent conversation and intellect you claim to have!

Posted by RowdyWicca at 06:50 PM : May 28, 2008


We all know about your "intelligence complex" Rowdy. Rotflmao. Sometimes--we have to speak in the language YOU really can understand. I "floated" the idea of Rowdywicca as a euphemism for you know what--and everyone seems to think it is somehow both appropos and wicked. Think about it: "Rowdywicca sounds like either a disease or something that desperately needs flushing--either into the toilet or out of one''s political system. Rowdywicca-- as in , "You can''t come over right now--I''ve got a horrible case of Rowdywicca. It''s catching on. LOL

[it_oldtimer]

With every passing day Hillary quietly fades further and further into the background. Her name hardly ever appears in the headlines any more.

I think we''re actually witnessing her version of a "dignified exit" even as we speak.

[crat3]

Obama should exit with dignity, and he should drop out of the race on June 4.

The uncommitted superdelegates must select the best qualified and strongest candidate to win the general election using their independent judgement without regard to any "delegate math."

The superdelegates are not locked in by the pledged delegates. If the superdelegates simply follow the "delegate math" in their decision, they are repudiating the reason the superdelegate system was created and making it completely meaningless.

The superdelegates are challenged to be fair and square and live up to their true function and responsibility. This calls for the superdelegates to show wisdom, integrity and courage in their independent judgment in selecting the best qualified and strongest presidential candidate and standing loyal to the best interests of the Democratic Party in winning the general election.

The superdelegates have only one choice for the Democratic presidential nominee: Sen. Clinton, on the unyielding principle of qualifications as the best qualified and the strongest candidate to defeat McCain and win the general election in a landslide hands down.

[mediahack1]

Hungry1968 writes " Please post where he''''s ever "torn her down".

But Obama himself prepared the ground by making the first gratuitous personal attack of the campaign during the televised Congressional Black Caucus Institute debate in South Carolina on 21 January, although virtually every follower of the media coverage now assumes that it was Clinton who started the negative attacks. Following routine political sniping from her about supposedly admiring comments Obama had made about Ronald Reagan, Obama suddenly turned on Clinton and stared intimidatingly at her. "While I was working in the streets," he scolded her, ". . . you were a corporate lawyer sitting on the board of Wal-Mart." Then, cleverly linking her inextricably in the public consciousness with her husband, he added: "I can''t tell who I''m running against sometimes."

[Lai K W]

Hillary has accomplished a lot which many have never dreamed of in their life. Her dignity does not depend on exiting. So the question of exit with dignity makes no sense at all.

Journalism displays abusive use of language so much that we begin to question the integrity of the media. This is one of many things that Hillary has accomplished.

Hillary''s campaign has pointed out to us the undemocratic processes that have been employed in the party for nomination and the era of insidious politics displayed by pundits against the will of people. For this alone she is very dignified person who defies venoms of unjustified attacks. Without her, the party does not stand a chance in the general election. The people in FL and Michigan are so sore with the party that it shall take a long time before the party will be forgiven.

Perhaps, the politician are so used to screw people that they underestimate the exposure of corruption of the party but as soon as the campaign of general election begins, we can''t would become we can''t win for BO.

[itsalessandr]

This isn''t spam, these are my blogs with dozens of analytical articles about Hillary Clinton''s candidacy.

http://www.Hillary-Wins.com

http://www.CaucusCheating.com

http://www.Florida-Michigan.com

[hillarynow]

Hillary is not doing this because she is power hungry, selfish, crazy, obsessive, insane or any of the other numerous character assassinations you Obama zombies like to ignorantly insinuate. Hillary loves America, period. Hillary knows what to do to fix America after 8 years of devastation at the hands of the Dictator in Chief idiot Bush. Hillary closes this thing with more votes from Americans nationwide than her competition, there is no reason she should back down, NONE. Where were all you people when Gore had more votes than Bush in 2000? When the Giants were taking down the Patriots in the Super Bowl? Unless you voted for Bush or are a Patriots fan, you were rooting for their competition and saying don''t quit, keep going. You Obama people follow Obama blindly like he can walk on water. Is that why he has lost every single key state including all of the essential swing states? and he has lost the popular vote nationwide when you include Florida''s and Michigan''s voters, which we know you hate to do in your little Obama fantasy world. Bottom line, Hillary may not have the delegates based on the warped rules of the Democratic party, but she won America and the American people over hands down. Get ready for President McCain..

[kmb08]

It should be noted that Katrina Vanden Heuvel is an Obama supporter. I agree that the superdelegates should follow the will of the people. So, when one candidate gets over 100,000 more votes than the other candidate, but the loser candidate takes more delegates, the will of the people surely isn''t the delegate count. With some votes in AA districts proportionally worth more than a vote in a rural district in garnering delegates, there is no "will of the people" expressed fairly. Hillary will end up this process with more popular vote, and by most accounts, this truly is the "will of the people". To side against the candidate with the popular vote, swing state victories, momentum, and still polling stronger against McCain, is to actually "laugh" at the will of the people, not support it. For one candidate to be ahead in delegates solely because of caucuses, in which nobody votes privately, and most people aren''t even allowed in the doors, is ludicrous.
To win solely due to disenfranchisement, makes for an illegitimate nominee for sure.

[hillarynow]

All the way to the Convention Hillary!

[rowdywicca]

RowdyWicca, aka RowdyTexan2 is a racist. A woman on Obama''''s ticket would not change his own skin color or the fact that his wife is black. For this reason alone, anyone that is white is preferable to Obama for Rowdy. It is not about feminism--if she did not have that excuse, she''''d use something else. Rowdy is reliving the race war--white vs black so no matter what Obama (and really no other black person) would be acceptable to her--not even a black woman. It is racism trying to cloak itself in feminism.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by b-easy63 at 03:35 PM : May 28, 2008

This from the woman who has been promoting racism like some badge of honor...and proof of her high minded scientific brain!

YOU people started the racism krap, and now it''s being thrown back in your face by the voters!

Get on your camel and ride out, cowgirl!