Comments on: Is Clinton Better For Commander-In-Chief?

National Review Online: Ohio Voters Feel Readiness For The Position Is Low Priority To Issues

Add a Comment See all 68 Comments
by gogam March 5, 2008 5:30 AM EST
SharnCedar is obviously not well-educated.

If you have had a clue about economics you would understand that outsourcing low skill, labour-intensive manufacturing jobs to foreign countries have provided HUGE profits for domestic companies. Profits that were taxed by the government that paid for local earmarks in your respective states (oh and the stupid war).

Unemployment is always going to be problem. But Clinton actually created more jobs and grew a surplus in the fiscal budget and that means MORE money to spend on domestic issues.

Get a clue before you argue your points. Better yet, get an education!
Reply to this comment
by gogam March 5, 2008 5:29 AM EST
SharnCedar is obviously not well-educated.

If you have had a clue about economics you would understand that outsourcing low skill, labour-intensive manufacturing jobs to foreign countries have provided HUGE profits for domestic companies. Profits that were taxed by the government that paid for local earmarks in your respective states (oh and the stupid war).

Unemployment is always going to be problem. But Clinton actually created more jobs and grew a surplus in the fiscal budget and that means MORE money to spend on domestic issues.

Get a clue before you argue your points. Better yet, get an education!
Reply to this comment
by gogam March 5, 2008 5:29 AM EST
SharnCedar is obviously not well-educated.

If you have had a clue about economics you would understand that outsourcing low skill, labour-intensive manufacturing jobs to foreign countries have provided HUGE profits for domestic companies. Profits that were taxed by the government that paid for local earmarks in your respective states (oh and the stupid war).

Unemployment is always going to be problem. But Clinton actually created more jobs and grew a surplus in the fiscal budget and that means MORE money to spend on domestic issues.

Get a clue before you argue your points. Better yet, get an education!
Reply to this comment
by gogam March 5, 2008 5:11 AM EST
Hillary may not be the best in history but for this lot I think so.

Obama may be a nice guy but he is too opportunistic and full of hyperbole. He''s eloquent, humble but something about him still sticks in my mind. HE HAS NO STAND ON ANY VIEWS, NO CHARACTER-DEFINING MOMENT WHERE HE SHOWED HIS METTLE. His non-vote on the war isn''t defining. It''s just self-serving. He wasn''t the ONLY person NOT to vote. Hell, I DIDN''T vote for Bush because I knew he was a moron --DOES THAT MAKE MY JUDGEMENT JUST AS GOOD AS OBAMA''S JUDGEMENT IN IRAQ. IF THAT''S THE CASE THEN PEOPLE SHOULD CHOOSE MY POINT OF VIEW AND PICK HILLARY.

But that is NOT why I support Hillary. It''s not because she is a fighter or all those things that her campaign has put up as her raison d''etre of the campaign.

I''m voting for Hillary because as a WOMAN she represents change in the real sense of the world. Obama is black BUT he is still a man. Men have too long been in the driver''s seat. How the world will view us now that we have a WOMAN in power is a very interesting alternative. Historically speaking, how many wars have WOMEN waged? Now there is an interesting statistic.

If YOU WILL TRUST MY JUDGEMENT THAT I DIDN''T VOTE FOR BUSH THEN you should pick Hillary lest you want to watch another 4 year train-wreck.
Reply to this comment
by idlepugilist March 5, 2008 3:21 AM EST
It''s progressives like SharnCedar who create delusional histories, burn books and love war. Sorry you didn''t like Bill Clinton. Let''s step it up several years now, and witness the American rejection of the Republican party for the condescending, falsely righteous and deceitful manipulation of America. And for George''s War, which George''s favorite - McCain - will keep on the front burner for as long is it takes to find a lingering stalemate. Can you say "Gaza Strip"?
Reply to this comment
by dinslc March 5, 2008 3:01 AM EST
NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No, NO, No!
Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 March 5, 2008 2:04 AM EST

YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes, YES, Yes,

Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 March 5, 2008 1:52 AM EST
"Is Clinton Better For Commander-In-Chief?"

Better than who. Better than Bush? Anyone is better than Bush. The commander doesn''t just order others to die for their nation. He, more significantly, doesn''t order, because he did the tough work of fixing the problem without war. Bush doesn''t do tough work (unless its clearing weeds in Crawford).
Reply to this comment
by blondie4359 March 5, 2008 1:26 AM EST
All those Obama supporters can go and report back to their leader who gives alot of Rhetoric about NAFTA and then does the opposite. MMM. It will be interesting what he has to say in court over his house and the slum lord... like a typical politician.. Hillary is not perfect.. too bad we do not have a decent Independent to vote for. AND NO !! I AM NO A HILLARY SUPPORTER. YOU NEED TO GET SOME FACTS STRAIGHT BEFORE YOU START RUNNING YOUR MOUTH...
Reply to this comment
by blondie4359 March 5, 2008 1:19 AM EST
Anyone have some kool aid ??

Reply to this comment
See all 68 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Verdict In Italy Verdict In Italy

    American Amanda Knox and Italian ex-boyfriend Found Guilty in Murder of British Student

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Decade in Photos Decade in Photos

    A Look Back at the Events that Rocked the Headlines in the 2000's

  • Jaimee Grubbs Secret Pics Jaimee Grubbs Secret Pics

    Los Angeles Party Girl Quick to Claim Tiger Affair, But Not So Fast To Reveal Criminal Past

  • Celebrity Circuit Celebrity Circuit

    Aishwarya Rai Photo Shoot:,"Lovely Bones" Premiere, Reese Witherspoon and Penelope Cruz

  • "Nine" Debuts in London

    Star-Studded Film Has a British Red Carpet Premiere

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: