Comments on: Mitt Romney Is No Jack Kennedy
The Nation: GOP Candidate's Speech On Faith Fails In Comparison To JFK's Historic Address
- I suggest guysdigdirt ask any Morman why the reference to underwear would be humerous, or minimally, an inside joke. But then he wouldn''t be able to express his homophobia.
When I was IN 2nd grade, or thereabouts, I was taught that in a phrase such as "in the company of OTHER women" as you used it, the "other" would refer to the subject noun, in this case, Romney. The sentence could have been written by someone who, sarcasticly, was trying to put Romney down by suggesting he was too feminine. But if you like it that way, go for it. I thought you''d like to know how silly it sounds.
You seem fixated on JFK''s alleged adultery. How do you feel about the alleged adultery of Reagan, FDR, or Jefferson? One oath that JFK definately kept was to protect and defend the US when he was sworn in to the military. Neither Romney nor his sons put themselves in a position to TAKE that oath - Reply to this comment
- Guysdigdirt @ 2:16 is the latest example. "Romney keeps his clothes on in the company of other women."
Slow down and tell us what that was SUPPOSED to mean. While you''''re at it, explain why someone who mentions underwear is a "*** pervert".
Posted by Quatrops
If you were to read the entire post including the copied comment from another person''s post you would find that I was refering to the fact that Romney is not like JFK in that he is not a womanizer, unfaithful to his wife, his vows or his commitments.
As far as someone commenting on underwear, there is not harm or perversion in that. But when you fixate on what underwear another man is wearing, it is not a normal or healthy fixation.
I hope that was elementary enough for you to understand. If not ask your 2nd grade teacher to explain it to you. - Reply to this comment
- Some commenters seem SO anxious to get in their "two cents worth" (and that''s often a correct dollar value) in multiple posts that they engage in "stream-of-consciousness" keyboarding and don''t read over what they have entered before hitting "publish".
Guysdigdirt @ 2:16 is the latest example. "Romney keeps his clothes on in the company of other women."
Slow down and tell us what that was SUPPOSED to mean. While you''re at it, explain why someone who mentions underwear is a "*** pervert". - Reply to this comment
- Mitt Romney''s speech on religions involvement in our nations birth was historically correct. It did in fact trump anything I ever read that JFK said. The point I''m trying to make is,......can Americans "AFFORD" to gamble on a good speech writer whose voting record is "close" unto his speech?.......Or should Americans trust Ron Paul''s "voting record" which mirrors perfectly the things that Mitt Romney said in his speech. Mitt is a CFR member [an un-sovereign globalist] and never heard him say boo about it either. Ron Is not a CFR member, nor will he ever be with his understanding of our Constitution. So think well people, and remember the soothing campaign speeches and promises made every election cycle by politicians whose voting record walk "doesn''t" match their campaign "tongue"........If you love our Constitution, why not vote for the one whose voting record "loves" it the most?......Ron Paul, proven student of the Constitution in 2008! GO USA!!!
- Reply to this comment
- Mitt is not JFK. Romney keeps his clothes on in the conpany of other women. He is honest, ethical and moral and as much as I respected what JFK spoke about, Romney will follow up his words with actions as he always has.
- Reply to this comment
- logicanada,
Make something of yourself and your country and then ridicule the US. You are all just posers and wannabes. If you could trade places with Romney you would do it in a heart beat and you know it, silly canadian. - Reply to this comment
- this slimeball (yuck) will say & do anything to get elected.
Posted by erpcat
It is said that we all look at the world thru the glasses of our own self. Just because you are so full of guile and dishonesty does not mean everyone else is also.
Do not look at his religion, or any other canidates, look at what they have done in their careers, judge them by their works. - Reply to this comment
- He is no Kennedy, rather he''''s more like Hugh Hefner, since it was the mormoons that help build Las Vegas.
Bye Mitt, now go wash those sacred underwear.
Posted by rushlimpdrug
Rush, you seem to be a g a y pervert with so much attention to other peoples underwear. The Mormons built Vegas? You are a crack pot as well as a pervert. - Reply to this comment
- I was a mormon and demanded out as it is lies. I have to tell them mormons to get lost. I have seen their dark evil side, Lass/
Posted by MichelleM99
Michelle, All due respect but your posts in the past have made you seem likeyou cheese is not all the way on your cracker. Enlighten us and tell us how it is they are not a good people, what is their dark side I know a lot of Mormons, they seem to be good upstanding people who are honest, fair and moral. I have not seen their dark side and based on what i have seen from them and what I have seen from you here, I will choose to believe them. - Reply to this comment
- your electoral process belongs on Jerry Springer.
What a bunch of trailer trash commentary. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




