Comments on: Reaching For Peace, Receiving Violence
New Republic: Israel, Palestian Authority Face The Dangers Of Unrealistic Expectations
Add a Comment See all 22 Comments
- this is a classic case of israel establishing "facts on the ground" via force and then whining about the possible reversal of them. please bear in mind that all of the "disputed" areas are stolen lands. exactly the same in the case of the settlements. they were taken under the guise of the necessity of safety, then became civilian. if the U.S. annexed parts of canada for security reasons , then turned them into U.S. out posts, how would canada enjoy it? not much i expect
- Reply to this comment
- this is a classic case of israel establishing "facts on the ground" via force and then whining about the possible reversal of them. please bear in mind that all of the "disputed" areas are stolen lands. exactly the same in the case of the settlements. they were taken under the guise of the necessity of safety, then became civilian. if the U.S. annexed parts of canada for security reasons , then turned them into U.S. out posts, how would canada enjoy it? not much i expect
- Reply to this comment
- this is a classic case of israel establishing "facts on the ground" via force and then whining about the possible reversal of them. please bear in mind that all of the "disputed" areas are stolen lands. exactly the same in the case of the settlements. they were taken under the guise of the necessity of safety, then became civilian. if the U.S. annexed parts of canada for security reasons , then turned them into U.S. out posts, how would canada enjoy it? not much i expect
- Reply to this comment
- this is a classic case of israel establishing "facts on the ground" via force and then whining about the possible reversal of them. please bear in mind that all of the "disputed" areas are stolen lands. exactly the same in the case of the settlements. they were taken under the guise of the necessity of safety, then became civilian. if the U.S. annexed parts of canada for security reasons , then turned them into U.S. out posts, how would canada enjoy it? not much i expect
- Reply to this comment
- this is a classic case of israel establishing "facts on the ground" via force and then whining about the possible reversal of them. please bear in mind that all of the "disputed" areas are stolen lands. exactly the same in the case of the settlements. they were taken under the guise of the necessity of safety, then became civilian. if the U.S. annexed parts of canada for security reasons , then turned them into U.S. out posts, how would canada enjoy it? not much i expect
- Reply to this comment
- this is a classic case of israel establishing "facts on the ground" via force and then whining about the possible reversal of them. please bear in mind that all of the "disputed" areas are stolen lands. exactly the same in the case of the settlements. they were taken under the guise of the necessity of safety, then became civilian. if the U.S. annexed parts of canada for security reasons , then turned them into U.S. out posts, how would canada enjoy it? not much i expect
- Reply to this comment
- this is a classic case of israel establishing "facts on the ground" via force and then whining about the possible reversal of them. please bear in mind that all of the "disputed" areas are stolen lands. exactly the same in the case of the settlements. they were taken under the guise of the necessity of safety, then became civilian. if the U.S. annexed parts of canada for security reasons , then turned them into U.S. out posts, how would canada enjoy it? not much i expect
- Reply to this comment
- this is a classic case of israel establishing "facts on the ground" via force and then whining about the possible reversal of them. please bear in mind that all of the "disputed" areas are stolen lands. exactly the same in the case of the settlements. they were taken under the guise of the necessity of safety, then became civilian. if the U.S. annexed parts of canada for security reasons , then turned them into U.S. out posts, how would canada enjoy it? not much i expect
- Reply to this comment
- this is a classic case of israel establishing "facts on the ground" via force and then whining about the possible reversal of them. please bear in mind that all of the "disputed" areas are stolen lands. exactly the same in the case of the settlements. they were taken under the guise of the necessity of safety, then became civilian. if the U.S. annexed parts of canada for security reasons , then turned them into U.S. out posts, how would canada enjoy it? not much i expect
- Reply to this comment
- this is a classic case of israel establishing "facts on the ground" via force and then whining about the possible reversal of them. please bear in mind that all of the "disputed" areas are stolen lands. exactly the same in the case of the settlements. they were taken under the guise of the necessity of safety, then became civilian. if the U.S. annexed parts of canada for security reasons , then turned them into U.S. out posts, how would canada enjoy it? not much i expect
- Reply to this comment
