Comments on: Too Little, Too Late On Iran?

National Review Online: Putting Revolutionary Guard On Terror List Is Welcome, But Not Enough

[clestes-2009]

National Review won''t be happy until Bush attacks Iran and finishes the plunge into catrasophe. From the wreckage of what was once the superpower USA, will float debt, joblessness, skyhigh gas prices and the resolution the never vote republican again!!!!

[feelfree1]

Antillo99,

Re: "It makes better sense to attack Al Qada Iran with Army Special Forces in covert operations."

Wouldn''t the Ghost-Busters be a better choice to use in battling this imaginary group?

[zoltaric]

FeelFree1


You are a very stupid person. I feel bad for you.

[feelfree1]

Re: Iranian Guard Labeled as TERRORISTS

(1 of 2)

And the so-called "War on Terror" moves even further into the farce category.

We know from a previous ABC News report, that the U.S. has been backing a Pakistani terrorist group that has been waging cross-border terrorist attacks inside Iran. According to ABC, this group has been "secretly encouraged and advised by American officials since 2005" (apparently ABC News is still doing some investigative reporting, unlike the relentless yellow-journalism of CBS Nooz).

A man who reportedly is associated with the Taliban, and with the drug trade leads this Pakistani-based terrorist group, the %u201CJundullah%u201D.

According to the report: "Regi (the leader) is essentially commanding a force of several hundred guerrilla fighters that stage attacks across the border into Iran on Iranian military officers, Iranian intelligence officers, kidnapping them, executing them on camera," Debat said.

"Most recently, Jundullah took credit for an attack in February that killed at least 11 members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard riding on a bus in the Iranian city of Zahedan."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/04/abc_news_exclus.html

[feelfree1]

(2 of 2)

The CIA goons deny direct funding of this terrorist group, but with all of the opium dollars flowing from the U.S. created bumper crop in Afghanistan, we can be certain that they can "find" money to support these kinds of terrorist activities.

So we have a Taliban associated drug dealer, working with the Bush global terrorist network, staging terrorist attacks in Iran, and executing members of Iran''s Revolutionary Guard. And now the Bush League wants to label the victims of these terrorist attacks as "TERRORISTS".

What a pathetic and ridiculous joke!

JAIL BUSH AND THE REST OF HIS MASS-MURDEROUS TORTURE-LOVING TERRORIST REGIME, WHILE THEY AWAIT TRIAL!!!

[zoltaric]

We should have invaded Iran 28 years ago. I am still waiting. I hope GWB has the cajones to engage them. I am in favor of attacking Iran. Bomb the hell out of them. Don''t worry about killing civilians, or liberating them, or setting up a government. Just bomb them relentlessly. Kill them all.

[samthetvcat]

"After September 11, in a moment of great strategic clarity, Bush said that the U.S. would not distinguish between terrorists and the governments that harbored them."

If the NRO thinks they can handle reality, then maybe they ought to address the question of why Bush went after Saddam rather than the Saudis if there were no terrorists in Iraq before he invaded (no terrorists according to the contributing analysts of the latest NIE).

Other issues the NRO need to stomach if they want to keep it real - how does that win the hearts and minds of Iraqis if the government has invited the guard on official visits, but the US has pulled rank in their sovereign country and taken the guard captive even though Iraq (and Afghanistan see Iran as an ally?

And how does that affect our relationship with Russia and China to designate the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as terrorists if they are providing arms to them. As well, is Europe on board with the designation? Apparently nobody is but Bush and the NRO.

What''s the ''real'' deal with the NRO? Do Bush and his cronies invite you guys to the White House for tea and flattery - does he tell you how much ''smarter'', ''stronger'' and more ''patriotic'' you are then the ''masses'' right before he tells you what to write?

[condumism]

NAZI Review: reporting only to the NEOCON base of FASCISTS and FOOLS.

[andor3]

The real neocon agenda is promoting chaos and instability in the region, especially Iraq, as a distraction. So Iran is practically partnered with Bush on this--I would not be surprised if we are funding the Revolutionary Guard. Someone should check and be sure the balances of those "frozen" accounts are not increasing.

[brianbwb-2009]

By the NRO''s very own definition, the US government is a terrorist organization, we also sell and otherwise provide arms to organizations that wish to cause mayhem to destabilize governments that are not subservient to US, the Kmer Rouge and the Contras come to memory, and we also sold weapons to both Iran and Iraq during the war.

We are now selling arms to Saudi Arabia and Israel, and given both countries'' inhabitants money lust, these weapons will find their way to so called "terrorist" organizations within an amazingly short time.

[roger_inkart]

Yes, we realize anything but an invasion of Iran will not be nearly enough for the bloodthirtsy chickenhawks at the NRO.

It''s amusing that the writer here (no one seems willing to take "credit" for this article for some reason) say that "to designate the Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist entity, then, is to acknowledge reality."

Please. Like the idealogues at NRO have any clue what "reality" is. The only reality the NRO is willing to acknowledge is one that fits in with their warped and deluded neo-con agenda.

[brianbwb-2009]

NRO, again advocating death and misery to innocents, as they are the only ones who will feel the impact of US aggression.

These people consistently demonstrate a Hitlerian sociopath''s disconnection from the human costs of their obscene musings.

I hope that the writers and editors of this article, and their loved ones are the first to go to Iran and fire upon humans, they will have no right to sorrow for any losses incurred..

[bluestardad]

MORE NEOCON BUSHIT...


WHEN ARE WE GOING TO ATTACK THE SAUDIS?

15 OF 19 HIJACKERS WHERE FROM THERE ALONG WITH BIN LADEN?

IRAN IS ISRAELI ENEMY NOT AMERICAS

[j4401]

The Real Reason We''re In Iraq: An influential group of conservatives convinced President George W. Bush that it was in America''s best interests to conquer Iraq as a first step toward dominating the oil-producing nations in the Middle East. There was no "exit plan" because we never intended to exit. The plan was, and is, to build military bases in Iraq and stay there forever. Our leaders also see Iraq as a place to make money. So Bush & Co. have set up their friends to cash in on the rebuilding of Iraq.