84 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
standlee5 says:
Government has grown so enormous that the important regulations are going by the wayside. The only way to solve the problem is a conservative approach which involves shrinking government. What we have now is an unmanigable mammoth that needs to be tamed otherwise we all lose. There is so much redundancy in govt. programs it's ridiculous.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tburzio says:
This is a silly argument. China was thought, up to a few weeks ago, to have their act in order. The Chinese don't inspect our export goods, because they rely on our internal controls to insure quality. The reverse is true too. Remember, it took a month just for the toxicology to find anything wrong in the food once we knew there was even a problem.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tburzio says:
This is a silly argument. China was thought, up to a few weeks ago, to have their act in order. The Chinese don't inspect our export goods, because they rely on our internal controls to insure quality. The reverse is true too. Remember, it took a month just for the toxicology to find anything wrong in the food once we knew there was even a problem.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tburzio says:
This is a silly argument. China was thought, up to a few weeks ago, to have their act in order. The Chinese don't inspect our export goods, because they rely on our internal controls to insure quality. The reverse is true too. Remember, it took a month just for the toxicology to find anything wrong in the food once we knew there was even a problem.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tburzio says:
This is a silly argument. China was thought, up to a few weeks ago, to have their act in order. The Chinese don't inspect our export goods, because they rely on our internal controls to insure quality. The reverse is true too. Remember, it took a month just for the toxicology to find anything wrong in the food once we knew there was even a problem.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jowand says:
Festes81,
You go it right, congratulations, Clinton never seriously tried to catch Bin Laden he even turned down multiple offers to have him turned over to us. It's on the record in Clinton's own words. Clinton didn't want him because he didn't think there was enough evidence to charge him. The real sleeze was from 1992 to 2000 and even before that in Arkansas, it's all documented. If you could get over your blind mindless hatred for Bush over Al"Warm-Dog"Gore losing in 2000, yes he really did lose; you be able to think straight.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
guysdigdirt says:
I bet you're one of those that even will say Clinton never tried to catch Osama. News flash, he did try, and he failed. The difference between him and Bush is the amount of resources spent and lives lost over it. Clinton wins in those two categories.
Posted by festes81
-------------------------

Show me where Clinton made a realistic try to catch Osama, he never did anything of the sort. Prove to me he did. You are really grasping for the last bit of hope that Clinton did anything worthwhile in office. Did Bush take us to war, yes he did, right along with Clinton's wench and many others who voted to take us to war. If you think Bush did that alone you are a bigger moron than you appear. Did Bush do so on bad intelligence, yes, but again, every one in the world thought Iraq still had WMD, not just Bush. They did exist, in your infinite wisdom tell us where they went Einstein.

The difference is that Bush faced his mistake. Hillary turned her back on the troops when it was not popular and Billy lied more to cover for his other lies. The Clintons have no backbone and never have.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
guysdigdirt says:
I bet you're one of those that even will say Clinton never tried to catch Osama. News flash, he did try, and he failed. The difference between him and Bush is the amount of resources spent and lives lost over it. Clinton wins in those two categories.
Posted by festes81
-------------------------

Show me where Clinton made a realistic try to catch Osama, he never did anything of the sort. Prove to me he did. You are really grasping for the last bit of hope that Clinton did anything worthwhile in office. Did Bush take us to war, yes he did, right along with Clinton's wench and many others who voted to take us to war. If you think Bush did that alone you are a bigger moron than you appear. Did Bush do so on bad intelligence, yes, but again, every one in the world thought Iraq still had WMD, not just Bush. They did exist, in your infinite wisdom tell us where they went Einstein.

The difference is that Bush faced his mistake. Hillary turned her back on the troops when it was not popular and Billy lied more to cover for his other lies. The Clintons have no backbone and never have.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
guysdigdirt says:
These are people who must lie, cheat and steal in their everyday lives. This is the only way I can explain that they want to deny the lies of bush-cheney-powell-rice-rumsfeld-gonzale
s-guiliani-mcCain-corporate cronies and entire GOP
Posted by noloyalisti
--------------------------
It is the only way you can explain it because you are either dishones with yourself or you are so stupid and will not educate yourself on reality but rather wallor in your stupidity.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
guysdigdirt says:
These are people who must lie, cheat and steal in their everyday lives. This is the only way I can explain that they want to deny the lies of bush-cheney-powell-rice-rumsfeld-gonzale
s-guiliani-mcCain-corporate cronies and entire GOP
Posted by noloyalisti
--------------------------
It is the only way you can explain it because you are either dishones with yourself or you are so stupid and will not educate yourself on reality but rather wallor in your stupidity.
reply
2/9