Comments on: Lieberman Takes Heat For Iran Warnings
National Review Online: Senator's Warning That Military Action Might Be Needed Triggers Left-Wing Attacks
- ...Continued
-The actual Iranian regime is not pleasing to America or the west, because of its position against Zionism, (not the Jews). Many times the Iranians have tried to shake hands with Washington through a real and decent relationship, but the rebuttal of Washington because of Political influence by AIPAC has aborted all attempts. Iran deosn't seem to be in a hurry to establish relationships for the sake of relationship with USA. They seem patient until better conditions are set.
-America needs to make a wise and intelligent decision where all interests in the Middle-East be preserved. One sided-vision with Israel is out-dated. The recent events have shown clearly to the world that USA's intersts do not necessarily imply Israel's interests, or vice-versa.
-We are condemning the bilateral relationships with as many as three quarter of the Middle-East population in order to satisfy only the tight Israeli's vision. It doesn't mean we have to sacrifice Israel for a boarder relationship with the Middle-Eastern countries. But a Better, more centered vision should be figured-out in order to embetter our standing in the region. Such an attitude will relax relationship with majority of the world. This may be a dream, I know not possible to make happen under Walking-Liar's and his cronies' legacy. In such, a revolution of visions must be undertaken in the White-House, and on Capitol Hill. - Reply to this comment
- So far, all of the Iranian-Americans I have asked, are in favor of nuking their own country! Go figure...
God Bless.
Posted by patriot75 at 05:56 PM : Jun 18, 2007
That fact that you followed up the phrase promoting the Nuking of a country with "God Bless" pretty much somes up the state of religion in this day and age.
How very christian. - Reply to this comment
- fredgrad:
I stand corrected, you did not say "invade Iran" - what you said precisely with regard to Lieberman's suggestion was:
"we CAN take RESPONSES to their actions against us with little risk at all from the air. To blame Lieberman and name-call him rather than realize he makes a legitimate point: How long are we gonna stand holding our ankles with our pants down regarding Iran before we pull them up, turn around and F&*( them back!!? - that's just stupid!!"
So you DO in fact support a BOMBING of Iran - or am I once again 'putting words in your mouth' or whatever . . . - Reply to this comment
- %u201CHe has crossed the line,%u201D said Orman, a professor of politics at Fairfield University. %u201CHis unilateral warmongering could lead to a new World War III.%u201D
Posted by MyIDonCBS at 10:23 PM : Jun 18, 2007
Maybe we are headed that way already. Maybe that's what the Middle East needs to settle this c**p once and for all, winner take all. - Reply to this comment
- Lieberman is so insane that the head of his own party says he should resign:
Connecticut for Lieberman Party Chairman John Orman called Tuesday for Sen. Joe Lieberman to resign, saying his advocacy of a military strike against Iran could explode into a global conflict.
%u201CHe has crossed the line,%u201D said Orman, a professor of politics at Fairfield University. %u201CHis unilateral warmongering could lead to a new World War III.%u201D - Reply to this comment
- Joe Lieberman says "U.S. should bomb Iran".
Lieberman sounds just like McLame(McCain). How about Mr. Lieberman, let's send your sons, daughters
and let's not forget grandchildren over there to "bomb iran". How about let's send YOU over there
too.....YOU IDIOT...... - Reply to this comment
- "When one country trains a force to infiltrate and destabilize its neighbor, it has committed an act of war."
Duh! *** has the USA been doing in the middle east for the entirety of Bush's reign of terror?
Oh, I forgot, we're the "good guys"; we can do no wrong. At least that's what the repubs and neocons keep telling us. - Reply to this comment
- samael2014,
"Let us not forget who the enemy of Americans are, and where they reside, and thank pieces of journalistic trash like this for reminding us."
Who are "the enemy of Ameicans" you are talking about? - Reply to this comment
- patriot75 wrote:
FYI - So far, all of the Iranian-Americans I have asked, are in favor of nuking their own country! Go figure...
God Bless.
Posted by patriot75 at 05:56 PM : Jun 18, 2007
patriot75,,,
My Iranians friends have been saying the same thing for over 10 years. The problem is the Iranian Government, not the Iranian people. The Iranian people like the West and a way must be figured out how not to alienate people already on your side. The U.S. understands this and I'm sure they are trying to figure out how to deal with the Iranian Government without hurting the Iranians. - Reply to this comment
- I read the first sentence of this hyprocritic propoganda and nearly pissed my pants. I'm not sure where the hell you've been over the past 5 years, but George Bush engaged the United States in an invasion of a soveriegn nation in the Middle East, through lies and propoganda and is a WAR CRIMINAL by international laws that long preceded any case that could be made against Iran by the same anti-American war-mongering President's attempt to defuse the massive murder of Iraqi's and the destruction of their society that this sociopath which has robbed American taxpayers well into the future to finance. Let us not forget who the enemy of Americans are, and where they reside, and thank pieces of journalistic trash like this for reminding us.
- Reply to this comment
Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy.




