Comments on: Lieberman Takes Heat For Iran Warnings
National Review Online: Senator's Warning That Military Action Might Be Needed Triggers Left-Wing Attacks
Add a Comment See all 62 Comments
- The kind of Zionism that Lieberman supports is the one manufactured for the sake of Anglo-American imperialism--it has little to do with what is good for Israel...aside, from the sick and twisted racists of the Likud and their ilk.
It has little or nothing to do with what most Jews in America believe.
The kind of Zionism that Lieberman supports is, like the kind of 'Christianity' that Bush, the Moonies and the CIA-connected evangelical death cult, centered in Lynchburg, Virginia practice is tailor-made to provide emotional backing for the finance capitalists in their empire building...rather like how Billy Graham was plucked from obscurity by the owner of TIME--Henry Luce-to give a spiritual side to the Capitalist's Cold War.
The wars that Lieberman--another shill for Anglo-American finance--and his ilk support are not wars that are good for America...they benefit only the finance capitalists. - Reply to this comment
- Benedict Arnold of the 20th Century is correct in stating Iran is supplying Iraq with weapons. The problem is we can't do much because he and others like him have made us so weak by starting a war with NO plans what so ever on how to win, not enough troops and so short on supplies for our people that their own families had to but them armor (and still are buying it).
- Reply to this comment
- I agree with Lieberman; Any country in the middle east that makes repeated efforts to destabilize the region, interfere with it's nieghbors, and cause American deaths should be bombed to hell and back.
Starting with ISRAEL. - Reply to this comment
- "Our politics is at an extraordinary pass when a senator who suggests we should be prepared to take military action to protect American troops from hostilities undertaken by a sworn enemy of the United States is roundly denounced."
You can thank your freind Bush for that. It's a sad thing to see the fruits of your labor be used against you isn't it National Review? - Reply to this comment
- SEND LIEBERMAN BACK TO ISRAEL HE DOES NOT BELONG IN AMERICA!
- Reply to this comment
- Lieberman = Twerp Jew Boy
Allegiance: Israel
Reality: Iraq is now part Iran.
Who cares anymore? - Reply to this comment
- Is it any surprise that Turncoat Joe, the Jew, Lieberman would make jingoistic remarks against one of the few governments that speaks out against Zionism?
Lieberman is one of a dwindling number of fools who still thinks that BUSH%u2019S WAR against Iraq is anything but a DISASTEROUS FAILURE. When the Zionists say %u2018Jump%u2019, Lieberman says, how high? Jew Lieberman is OCCUPIED territory for the Israeli government and he will continue to lobby the US government, military, and taxpayers to do the DIRTY work for Israel. Unfortunately, the voters in Connecticut kept this Bush/Cheney/Israeli lackey in power for another six years - Reply to this comment
- Well according to articles, the General in Iraq provided proof of Iran's activity in training / supporting units that are killing Iraqis/Americans. Why not submit it to the UN or whoever for their action? If diplomacy is so preferred, get on with it Dems, and quit yappin' off at the trap like usual (disclaimer: I'm not dem or repub, I just think the Dems have been fairly impotent for all the trash they talked, which I guess should be expected of modern day politicians of all flavor).
- Reply to this comment
- the DNC has faith in diplomacy in dealing with Iran..how long should we wait?? 10 years?? 20 years?? 30 years?? lets ask Carter if his diplomacy worked..
the only way would diplomacy work is both parties are willing to discuss diplomacy..I dont think Iran is willing - Reply to this comment
- My Iranians friends have been saying the same thing for over 10 years. The problem is the Iranian Government, not the Iranian people. The Iranian people like the West and a way must be figured out how not to alienate people already on your side....
Posted by tbweb
-The problem is one who sits on one side of the fence without seeing the other. Most of the friends you have, tbweb, left Iran at the revolution of Khomeiny, which ended up with the 444 days Americans' hostage-taking. Most probably because Shah's Iran was simply very permeable to Israel interests in the Middle-East. With the revolution, the minority of Iranians that were taking 90% of the advantages provided by the Shah Regime fled to USA and other Western countries, fearing some accountability by the people-supported regime.
-tbweb, if those are your friends, well it's very expectable to hear this from them. True fact, Iranians have little animosity toward others. They have scarcely had any event of desolate incidence on humans, unlike Turks, Russians, Japanese, Indians-Pakistanis, French, Brits (not to mention Israel) or USA, who in a moment or the other in history have been repressive and detrimental toward neighboring nations. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.
