Comments on: Lieberman Takes Heat For Iran Warnings
National Review Online: Senator's Warning That Military Action Might Be Needed Triggers Left-Wing Attacks
Add a Comment See all 62 Comments
- http://www.terrorismawarene
ss.org/know
-about-jihad/
Posted by superchez1
Here's something you should all look at. Very, very impressive. Then consider what Lieberman's saying. - Reply to this comment
- The religious right wing must go they are a danger to the world.
Posted by antoniof123
They were fine until people like you came along. Why don't you just go and the danger will be gone. - Reply to this comment
- Joe was elected Democraticly in a landslide by Republicans, Democrats, And Independents. Liberals are pissed Because they were beat by the silent majority. Since the liberals tried to screw him Joe has been using every opurtunity to remind them of their failure. Diplomacy is a joke. "Sure we can talk about the nuclear missle s I'm building. we can talk all you want, untill their done."
- Reply to this comment
- Senator Joe Lieberman article speaks aloud of hints from William Buckley, who may or may not have had a part as the constructive agenda of the articulated phraseolgy so well identified by Bill's ability to make a five word phrase become one hundred and five before he unloads the real meaing of what he is attempting to convey - thus - a very eloquent - brilliant - spokesperson for whatever.
The litany has gone wild in even a smote of approval of what Joe Lieberman says or stands for. His respect is directed to whomever will comb his locks most bearing opportunity. When OPPORTUNITY presents itself - whatever form- here goes Joe.
His excursion to Iraq was mostly planned for his presentation of an "all is well" approach which will incite the Republicans to say "well done Joe" and Joe goes to another Opportunity.
Joe doesn't believe diplomacy works - apparently the article expresses the same - so he doesn't desire to debate the pros and cons - only the immediate Bush Doctrine - we don't speak with our enemies - who are the enemies? By the way THERE HAS BEEN NO DIPLOMACY since Jan 1 2001.
Even respected diplomats from other countries state GEORGE BUSH DOCTRINE IS MY WAY OR NO WAY. They have grown accustomed to NO DIPLOMACY IN MY OVAL. - Reply to this comment
- The production of words which represent minds of "radio talk hosts" to dismantle the Democratic party is running full blast. And apparently there is no slowing of the runway activity.
Somewhere, the rubber meets the road -when will the expressions as GOSPEL finally be unearthed.
The expressions suggest that "free speech" may be abused by those clever enough to escape any worthwhile censorship - and although politicians burst their lungs about other abuses, no one except Senator Lott has expressed his disapproval of the ordeal..
Truth can be dealt with by most professionals but the public is getting the THIS IS GOSPEL treatment undeserved and allowed to be received through ignorance of the REAL TRUTH. Whatever the host determines will create excitement and dismantling of the Democratic arena is the game most played.
Think - power of the %u201Chost%u201D in 2004 election - could it be possible that %u201Ctwo hosts%u201D with their extreme desire to dismantle - won the election for George W Bush. Answer --Very possible. - Reply to this comment
- Oh Please, any moron should have known that once we occupied Iraq, others in the region who are hostile toward us would gladly get into the game.
There are consequences for extreme stupidy and arrogance and we are reaping them now and will be for a generation or more regardless of when we move on out of there. Dubya and his band or merry misfits will of course be living high on the hog and have little reason to give a ***. - Reply to this comment
- The religious right wing must go they are a danger to the world.
- Reply to this comment
- When Joe Lieberman speaks, listeners should consider WHO IS JOE LIEBERMAN. If you recognize a Senator who has a great allegiance to President Bush [he thought he was going to route out Rumsfeld for the Secretary's job] and the Republican party [could not get re-elected as a Democrat - turned to Independent, but without the Republican party simply dumping their candidate in favor or Joe - Joe would be doing something other than acting as a responsible Senator from CN] - you recognize right.
Much respect to Joe, but his theory on military has to be examined. His demand for invasion of Iran has been clearly stated - his reluctance to even talk about bringing the troops home goes exactly as President Bush's desires. The sadness of his unspoken expression shows little sympathy for the "real losers" of the Iraq issue - soldiers and families. Examples of thought fully deny any rebuttal of that by Joe. Attempting to make the public believe whatever the President wishes as "just ok" is also loudly expressed every time the issue arises
Apparently, the President has not taken Joe into the Oval to alarm him of the consequences of the proposed %u201Cair strike%u201D that Israel is ready to deliver. Most express millions of deaths. If George or Joe believes that the Iranian armed forces will simply look skyward to be glorified by the bombs, George and Joe have been sleeping more than they should. - Reply to this comment
- Do you suppose Iran is still using the weapons Reagan gave to the terrorists in exchange for the hostages? Or did Bush Sr. give them new ones?
- Reply to this comment
- We have been doing the same thing for years! But, no politician says anything about it. We supplied the rebel's in Afganistan when the Russian's were there and several other places. Now suddenly it's an 'act of war'??????? What is wrong with these people????? Do they think starting another failed war is the answer for all the mistakes they have made in the past????? If they were going to take on Iran they should have done it a couple of wars ago! Lieberman has gotten so phony he is fast becoming irrelevant! I am glad he is no longer a Democrat! That would be enough to make me stop voting for them.
- Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.
