Comments on: Report: Jackson Not the Father of His Kids
Michael Jackson Wasn't Sperm Donor for In Vitro Conception of His Three Children, TMZ reports
- WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL ANYWAY. HE DID NOT HAVE TO USE HIS SPERM. PEOPLE ADOPT CHILDREN EVERYDAY. HE IS THE ONLY PARENT THESE CHILDREN KNEW. INSTEAD OF PRAYING FOR THESE KIDS WHO JUST LOST THEIR DADDY PEOPLE ARE WORRYING ABOUT IF HE IS THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER OR NOT. GET A LIFE WHY DON'T YOU.
- Reply to this comment
- You're right if you are talking about general mistakes, eccentricities, bad descisions....etc..but I think most would agree that if this man molested children, then he was the biggest hypocrite in the world. If he didn't molest children, then what he has gone through is a tragedy in itself. Problem is, the only people that know the truth is him and the children.
- Reply to this comment
- Of course. :)
- Reply to this comment
- MJ may have donated much to charity but at the end of the day he died rich - with more money after his debts are subtracted than anyone posting here is going to ever see a tenth of during their lives. Even Bill Gates organized a foundation with the express purpose of getting rid of his fortune so that by the time he dies, there would not be a mountain of money that would be dumped on his children. Maybe MJ's death was unexpected, but I certainly didn't see him making any plans to give all his money away as he got older.
As for measuring myself against MJ, you can do that if you want, I can guarantee you though that by the time I die my estate won't have squat in it. And my Uncle Sam is doing his damndest to back that guarantee up! - Reply to this comment
- That's all very nice but it's easy to be nice and gentle when you are wealthy enough so that if you felt like not working for the rest of your life you could just walk away from it. The people I have the most respect for are the people who have nothing and struggle to live from day to day - yet are still "very humble and professional" as you put it. When you were working with those folks you were working with them when they really didn't have any serious crisis, not serious in the long run. Even MJ's problems during the famous Pepsi commercial - he was in the hospital, fully paid, the next day. Not like the rest of us working stiffs who if we were in the same situation, we would be struggling to decide if we could even go to the hospital, and if we were in the hospital we would be worried about losing our house in bankruptcy when we got out.
I'm glad you enjoyed your experiences but you only think you know what kind of people those entertainers are, you really don't know them at all. Once they are independently wealthy and not dependent on anyone for the rest of their lives, few people are ever going to see what kind of person they truly are. Why do you think Jesus said it was easier to get a camel through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven - this is exactly the kind of thing he was talking about. - Reply to this comment
- "...Most of the boys in the vienna boys choir have been neutered...."
This is flat out rubbish. Castration faded out from European boy choirs back in the 1800's. And in any case it was never a guarantee that the boy would keep his voice. The Vienna choir almost vanished in the early 1900's anyway, due to the dissolving of the Habsburg empire.
The boys in the Vienna choir today look forward to their voices cracking - they regard it as a rite of passage into manhood. And most of them don't listen to classical music for relaxation - they listen to the same thing that regular boys listen to - rock music. They just sing classical music, it's their job. Typically their voice cracks around age 13, and after that happens they leave the Palais Augarten boarding school and go back home to regular school. If they still have a voice and want to keep singing, many join the Chorus Viennensis. - Reply to this comment
- I think everyone needs to mind their own business and worry about their own. No one is perfect. We forget he was a human being and not god. We all have made mistakes. I don't agree with every move he has made but that is no reason to dog him around. He was a person and he has family that loves him no matter what has happened. I think we should respect his family. No one wants their family member talked about like they have talked about him. Leave this man alone.Most of you have skeltons too, and the most of you would die if someone found out about you or your past. Respect him and the family.
- Reply to this comment
-
- You're right if you are talking about general mistakes, eccentricities, bad descisions....etc..but I think most would agree that if this man molested children, then he was the biggest hypocrite in the world. If he didn't molest children, then what he has gone through is a tragedy in itself. Problem is, the only people that know the truth is him and the children.
- by erasmus111 July 1, 2009 10:09 AM PDT
You're right. I could care less if he was castrated.
Reply to this comment by udontnoitall July 1, 2009 11:45 AM PDT
You mean you couldn't care less.
:P - Reply to this comment
- by udontnoitall July 1, 2009 11:46 AM PDT
Nope. Just picked you out today.
Oh, so I should feel privileged? :) - Reply to this comment
- In the 17th & 18th centurys, young boys with beautiful soprano operatic voices were castrated, so that they could assume the woman's role in opera, as women were not allowed to appear on stage. They were called the "Castrati". Is it possible that someone (probably his evil father) did this to Michael so that his beautiful voice would continue to rake in the $$? If so, this would explain his secretive, tortured life, his childlike behavior, and his inability to father children. If this is true, it would be good for his memory for it to be confirmed, as millions of people (including me) believe he was a child molester.
- Reply to this comment
- Nope. Just picked you out today.
- Reply to this comment
- Okay, that makes sense.
- Reply to this comment
- You mean you couldn't care less.
- Reply to this comment
- Oh relax. Yes, I have posted some other comments contributing to the story.
- Reply to this comment
- Sometimes, "they" lie.
- Reply to this comment
- by ladypirate2 July 1, 2009 10:27 AM PDT
pved Don't you think that the older children probably already knew without being told? Children are very perceptive. They notice things that you think they don't notice. They know that their skin is white and the Jacksons are black.
Are you talking about the fact that Michael wasn't their biological father? Of course they probably knew that. I think what pved is talking about is everything else. The kids don't need to hear all the other garbage the media is spitting out. - Reply to this comment
-
- pved said And if in fact these three children are the product of donor sperm or donor egg for that matter -- and their father hadn?t for whatever reason had and important conversation with his children about their story and their origins then they are certainly finding out in one of the most damaging ways ever.
I was responding to pved's statement about what if their father hadn't had the important conversation with them about their story and origins. I think they might not know the exact details but they know that Michael wasn't their biological father. They should know that by now without being told.
You are right, though, about the kids not needing to hear the garbage that the media is spilling out. I think Michael's mother would be wise to have a private conversation with them now, without anyone else in the room, and just told them the details of their births before they hear too much of the garbage that the media is spilling. They need to hear it from her and nobody else and they need to hear the truth before they hear the garbage from the media.
- pved said And if in fact these three children are the product of donor sperm or donor egg for that matter -- and their father hadn?t for whatever reason had and important conversation with his children about their story and their origins then they are certainly finding out in one of the most damaging ways ever.
- sperm and a egg does not make you a mother or father. Michael was their true father.
- Reply to this comment
- What is the purpose of this report? This is so damaging to an already hurting family. Shame on TMZ....
- Reply to this comment
- pved Don't you think that the older children probably already knew without being told? Children are very perceptive. They notice things that you think they don't notice. They know that their skin is white and the Jacksons are black.
- Reply to this comment
- by pved July 1, 2009 10:03 AM PDT
The frenzy over the death of Michael Jackson is mind blowing ? the question about his children?s genetics, incredibly distasteful.
Nancy Grace, Larry King, TMZ, US Weekly, People Magazine ? they are all saying things like:
?Who?s the real father?? ?Who?s the real mother?? ?Who?s he biological father?? ?Who?s the biological father??
And I say ?Who cares? And it I any of your business??
udontnoitall
Here's someone else that says "Who cares" whether he was the biological father or not. Got nothing to say to her/him? - Reply to this comment



