- Add a Comment
-
- The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Reply to Comment The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
The court has acted irresponsibly in blocking the FCC from performing this function, especially in such an outrageous example as this.
The mere fact that a momentary flashing of a breast on television is something you consider a problem
------------------------------
When it was INTENTIONAL, it''s a problem. Jackson has now admitted that it was intentional.
THAT MAKES IT A PROBLEM. There was nothing "inadvertent" about it. IT WAS CAREFULLY PLANNED IN ADVANCE.
They will advertise to the billions worldwide who do watch, and disregard as irrelevant those few who don''''t.
------------------
So, then, is that the OFFICIAL position of The Big Eye network? Pander to the smut watchers???
SO, nolalou It''''s no big deal I agree but can I see yours? PLEASE!!!!
----------------
LOL! Good one.
Who said it was OK? We''''''''re just addressing as many problems as we can, one at a time.
Posted by txgrouch2006
The mere fact that a momentary flashing of a breast on television is something you consider a problem worth spending one second of time worrying about, shows the person with the problem is YOU!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by nolalou at 04:42 PM : Jul 21, 2008
+
SO, nolalou It''s no big deal I agree but can I see yours? PLEASE!!!!
No, they are not. They will advertise to the billions worldwide who do watch, and disregard as irrelevant those few who don''t.
Black female boobs were on the tube
-------------------
When did THAT ever happen???
Sounds like you''re MAKING THINGS UP.