Comments on: Oscar Ratings A Dud

Early Nielsen Reports Sunday's Viewership Could Be Lowest Ever

Add a Comment See all 35 Comments
by olebd February 25, 2008 11:00 PM EST
With all that''s going on in the world and with the economy, worrying about paying the bills paycheck to paycheck, the last thing I want to do is watch some fantasyland egomainiacs receive yet more awards for doing their job and getting paid for it very well.
Reply to this comment
by Syndicate February 25, 2008 10:56 PM EST
Its all fixed. None of these awards are given to people with talent. Its who will make the most money. Glad to see people waking up and tuning out. Its kinda like that documentry on movie ratings. They rated it NC-17 to keep people from watching it. NO ***. No foul langauge. No Violance. Just an expose on the movie industrie. NC-17.
Reply to this comment
by stevenvideo February 25, 2008 10:44 PM EST
The million dollar question is why would anyone in America with half a brain even care about these phony overpaid untalented actors? Most of them think they are better then everyone else on the plant and they are so fake and so phony I pay them no attenion, but this comment. I even live in Hollywood, CA and ignore the whole fake hype.
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 February 25, 2008 10:39 PM EST
Oscars need a radical makeover. Try something that hasn''t been done before. A different format. ANYTHING. They show the same old movie clips in montages. Why do they waste time showing us footage of past Best Actor winners. "Look there''s Robert De Niro! With a beard! Go figure!"

Do we have to hear the Oscar-nominated songs? Can''t they just play snippets of them when it''s time to announce the winner?

It would have been fun to see Travolta land on his butt when he was finished with his dancing. Almost slipped on something.

They only went 20 minutes over the alloted time. But still it seems like FOREVER when it''s on. All of the corny things they make the presenters say.

I thought Nicole Kidman looked pretty good. Cameron Diaz has a huge mouth.
Reply to this comment
by puzzler125 February 25, 2008 9:50 PM EST
While Jon Stewart tends to be most popular with intellectuals and/or college students and a younger population what I think the Academy Awards needs as a host is Billy Crystal or another COMEDIAN of his calibre. Chris Rock was pretty funny, David Letterman was a so-so host of the A. Awards, and I say bring back Billy. Stewart did do a better job than the first time. Whoopi was pretty good and Steve Martin would be great!
Reply to this comment
by gostox February 25, 2008 9:46 PM EST
Bottom Line.....The Oscars are tooo long. Who wants to stick around for FOUR hours?!! The solution is to shorten the Oscars to TWO hours or else fewer and fewer people will watch the Oscarsevery year. Easier to just read the results the next day the sit around for hours and hours and hours.......
Reply to this comment
by pupeta-2009 February 25, 2008 9:44 PM EST
Right now it''s kind of hard to get people to watch an interesting intelligently made movie, such as "no country for old men" or "there will be blood" amongst others. We have a country with the largest population of morons who cannot go beyond eating, breathing and shi....ing and they do this because the body tells them to because if they could find a way to avoid doing these functions they would. They barely read and write and forget thinking or developing a mental capacity for analisis, that is too hard.
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 February 25, 2008 9:33 PM EST
For me, the Oscars have undergone exactly the same evolution as pro football. During the 70s and early 80s I would watch Monday Night Football each week, religously. It has been at least twenty years since I''ve had sufficient interest to sit through a game. As with football, the Hollywood personalities have changed and they are far more amorphous and far less interseting. I care nothing about these performers or a vast majority of the films they are associated with.
Reply to this comment
by ssm9451 February 25, 2008 9:24 PM EST
Glad that Daniel Day-Lewis won an Oscar!! He is awesome in "There Will Be Blood."
Reply to this comment
by seafang February 25, 2008 9:07 PM EST
Well I watched my local Korean News Network station. No I can''t understand a word of Korean but it beats watching the oscars hands down.

Well in the future, all these movies will be made by programmers out of ones and zeroes. Come to think of it, they are already made out of zeroes.

The antics of those depraved people in Hollywood are a crashing bore, and they have all become know it all politicians and environmentalists anyway.

Yes I think I''ll study Korean.
Reply to this comment
See all 35 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Verdict In Italy Verdict In Italy

    American Amanda Knox and Italian ex-boyfriend Found Guilty in Murder of British Student

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Decade in Photos Decade in Photos

    A Look Back at the Events that Rocked the Headlines in the 2000's

  • Jaimee Grubbs Secret Pics Jaimee Grubbs Secret Pics

    Los Angeles Party Girl Quick to Claim Tiger Affair, But Not So Fast To Reveal Criminal Past

  • Celebrity Circuit Celebrity Circuit

    Aishwarya Rai Photo Shoot:,"Lovely Bones" Premiere, Reese Witherspoon and Penelope Cruz

  • "Nine" Debuts in London

    Star-Studded Film Has a British Red Carpet Premiere

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: