Comments on: Dr. Drew: Britney Is Dying Before Our Eyes

TV Addiction Guru Says Pop Star Is Following "Anna Nicole" Blueprint

Add a Comment See all 44 Comments
by mercyme884 January 16, 2008 1:02 AM EST
SAY WHAT YOU WANT ABOUT MS.SPEARS BUT UNTIL SHE DECIDES TO CHANGE HER HABITS AND STRAIGHTEN UP HER ACTIONS THERE WILL NOT BE ANY VISIBLE ACTS TO BE SEEN. SHE IS A SPOILED BRAT THAT CARES NOTHING FOR HER CHILDREN OR HERSELF. SHE NEEDS TO GROW UP AND STRAIGHTEN HER MISERABLE LIFE OUT BEFORE SHE EVER SEES OR HAS ANY CONTACT WITH THOSE PRECIOUS CHILDREN. GROW UP MS SPEARS
Reply to this comment
by jlee2027 January 16, 2008 12:59 AM EST
The problem isn''t Britney it''s the idea that a 26 year old person has to face the lying corrupt fools of family court. Because once they nail you, there''s no escape. It''s 18 years of torture. Think waterboarding is bad? It''s absolutely nothing compared to the mind numbling sinister manipulations that occur designed to destory your family and your children. Remove Family Court, and somehow Britney, while loving to party too much, is fairly normal for a 26 year old.
Reply to this comment
by lil_d3vil January 16, 2008 12:36 AM EST
Everyone keeps saying Britney''s tested clean..

Do people really believe that tripe?
So with all the New privacy laws in place her personal physician is going to risk his job to tell celebrity rags there are no drugs in her system. I don''t think so.

You can put anyone in rehab,BUT they have to want to be helped to get over their addiction or once out they will go right back to their old ways. Obviously Britney isn''t there yet.
Reply to this comment
by leeann2008 January 16, 2008 12:04 AM EST
I just don''t get it.. maybe because I do not know her and live her life personally.. but come on.. let her live a life where she would really be depressed and want to give up. She has millions of dollars, she could have everything she wants. Let her switch shoes with a mother who has to give her child injections of insulin everyday so he can live, let her deal with financial struggles and the uncertainity of when and if her husband will come home from fighting for his country. She should be grateful that she has no financial worries, two heathly boys and people who want to help her. I don''t buy it BRITNEY!!!! Your career is in a slump and you are doing all this for attention. Get some help and for God''s sake take a shower!
Reply to this comment
by olga75-2009 January 15, 2008 10:05 PM EST
Dear Dr.Pinsky,
If your treatments were working (including Lindsay Lohan), then it would make sense to place people into institutions. Since they don''t, not even close, you are wasting people''s money and time. You are unsuccessful in what you do. This is my first point.
The second one is that someone pays huge bucks for Britney to be in the front line news, and distract people from a mass that''s happening in American government. All this is called diplomacy, and you, doctor, are just bullsh...ing people. Get lost, really.
Reply to this comment
by frb01 January 15, 2008 9:38 PM EST
Unless you have been there, the general public doesn''t understand mental illness and or addiction, which often go together. Most think you just snap out of it. And these talking heads with MD degrees, don''t help the situation. Like Duh, yes she could die from this and no-one would be laughing. She needs a true mental health profession to intervene on her behalf, not someone who is in it for their own agenda. Thousands of Americans deal with mental illness every day and struggle with it outside the public eye, it is not easy.
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 January 15, 2008 9:30 PM EST
Why did she have kids? Obviously wasn''t ready for them? Federline wasn''t the love of her life. Being a mother was the last thing she needed. Can''t even take care of yourself. Thinks that just because whe''s a female with a working uterus, she should have kids. Like it''s all going to be fun & games. No sacrifice or hard work on her part.

If she was into Scientology, Tom Cruise would be prescribing vitamins.
Reply to this comment
by realtalk5950 January 15, 2008 8:38 PM EST
So u mean she did nothing to "physically injure" her kids...
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat January 15, 2008 7:49 PM EST
"Anna Nicole didn''t seem to do anything that endangered her kids (?)" posted by SamTheTVCat

You mean a drug addicted mother isn''''t a danger to her kids? "

Posted by erasmus6 at 04:28 PM : Jan 15, 2008

No I mean she didn''t ever dangle her kids over a rail or drop them on the head requiring child services investigations . . .
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 January 15, 2008 7:28 PM EST
"Anna Nicole didn''''t seem to do anything that endangered her kids (?)" posted by SamTheTVCat

You mean a drug addicted mother isn''t a danger to her kids?
Reply to this comment
See all 44 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Verdict In Italy Verdict In Italy

    American Amanda Knox and Italian ex-boyfriend Found Guilty in Murder of British Student

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Decade in Photos Decade in Photos

    A Look Back at the Events that Rocked the Headlines in the 2000's

  • Jaimee Grubbs Secret Pics Jaimee Grubbs Secret Pics

    Los Angeles Party Girl Quick to Claim Tiger Affair, But Not So Fast To Reveal Criminal Past

  • Celebrity Circuit Celebrity Circuit

    Aishwarya Rai Photo Shoot:,"Lovely Bones" Premiere, Reese Witherspoon and Penelope Cruz

  • "Nine" Debuts in London

    Star-Studded Film Has a British Red Carpet Premiere

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: