Comments on: In America, Millions Breathe Too Much Soot
EPA Adds 15 Cities To Sooty Air List, Brings Total To 46; Environmentalists Critical Of Lax Standards
Add a Comment See all 96 Comments
- global warming my schwantz, too much soot my schwantz....all this is is BULL sheet to make this country completely dependent on other countries'' manufacturing....remove all our factories and other means of production in the name of clean air.....I have lived when the steel mills were operating at 100 percent in this countrty....yes, there was some soot.....now, all the hundreds of thousands of Americans can breathe "clean air" while they cash their welfare and unemployment checks......Dear God, PLEASE restore common sense! ! ! !!
- Reply to this comment
- Soot???.....How about spraying of Toxins in the form of Micro-Capsules on unsuspecting American Citizens, Men, Women, and Children???:
"Nothing brings home the comprehension of the New World Order depopulation agenda than the realization that you and your family are also on the "useless eaters" (Henry Kissinger) elimination list"... - Reply to this comment
- Because the science became so obvious even THEY could no longer deny it.
Posted by troutfisher4
*************************
Sorry I dont buy that, they could have maintained SOP with a few well placed funds in the right automakers pockets and kept right on going with business as usual, with no fear of being outed with alternative fuel. Something or Someone convinced them it was in their best interest. And it wasnt science. - Reply to this comment
- I hope this discussion has opened your eyes somewhat.
Gotta go. - Reply to this comment
- You really don''''''''t understand why they deny global warming? Really?
Posted by troutfisher4
**********************
why they denied it yes I understand, Why all of a sudden are they gung ho on the alternative energy front? they didnt cut their own throats for nothing.
Posted by DebinOK1
Because the science became so obvious even THEY could no longer deny it. - Reply to this comment
- You really don''''t understand why they deny global warming? Really?
Posted by troutfisher4
**********************
why they denied it yes I understand, Why all of a sudden are they gung ho on the alternative energy front? they didnt cut their own throats for nothing. - Reply to this comment
- Yes I have seen that, my question is why? they dont cut their own throats for no reason.
Posted by DebinOK1
You really don''t understand why they deny global warming? Really? - Reply to this comment
- Put a Tiger In Your Think Tank
ExxonMobil has pumped more than $8 million into more than 40 think tanks; media outlets; and consumer, religious, and even civil rights groups that preach skepticism about the oncoming climate catastrophe. - Reply to this comment
- The oil giant ExxonMobil has admitted that its support for lobby groups that question the science of climate change may have hindered action to tackle global warming. In its corporate citizenship report, released last week, ExxonMobil says it intends to cut funds to several groups that "divert attention" from the need to find new sources of clean energy.
Posted by troutfisher4
******************
Yes I have seen that, my question is why? they dont cut their own throats for no reason. - Reply to this comment
- DebinOK1
You and many others have been manipulated by the millions spent by fossil fuel companies like Exxon-Mobil.
It is time to WAKE UP. - Reply to this comment
- Why is working towards a common goal, particularly for the good of people and the planet, such a bad thing? When did working together become such an evil conspiracy? Not that I don''''t believe in evil or in conspiracies. I just don''''t see the everywhere.
Posted by IrishWench
*********************
There is nothing wrong with working together for the good of the people or the planet, if that is the true intent, just to much "other" going on to make it that simple. The current economy of the global markets, the current push for globalization in climate change, to many "bad" rulers being forced out by bigger countries. It just suggests a more sinister motive. - Reply to this comment
- Exxon to cut funding to climate change denial groups
May 2008
The oil giant ExxonMobil has admitted that its support for lobby groups that question the science of climate change may have hindered action to tackle global warming. In its corporate citizenship report, released last week, ExxonMobil says it intends to cut funds to several groups that "divert attention" from the need to find new sources of clean energy. - Reply to this comment
- Do you now get the picture?
Posted by troutfisher4
***********************
And what were aramcos profits? Those are the things you have to look at. - Reply to this comment
- IrishWench
When I was teaching, we used to call them "recalcitrant students" :) - Reply to this comment
- Wow! That is some serious deductive reasoning. You got all of that from too much soot in the air?
Posted by IrishWench
*****************
Thats just part of it. To many countries working toward common goals, with a select few remaining in power. - Reply to this comment
- $100 BILLION DOLLARS
in one year
Do you now get the picture? - Reply to this comment
- Lets talk money, and who has the most to gain from continued denial of climate change:
Exxon Mobil''s staggering $40.6 billion earnings for 2007 beat its own one-year-old record for the biggest corporate profits ever by 3 percent. Put together with the announcement by the No. 2 U.S. oil company, Chevron, of an $18.7 billion year, up 9 percent over 2006, plus the earlier results of Shell and ConocoPhillips, and that''s more than $100 billion in profits from four companies. - Reply to this comment
- I can easily prove THAT wrong.
Posted by troutfisher4
****************
How? - Reply to this comment
- Now you get it, geesh, this isnt about climate, its about money, those who have the money have the power. Power can influence many. Think One world government, one world currency, one world religion. get the idea.
Posted by DebinOK1
I can easily prove THAT wrong. - Reply to this comment
- and somewhere in there will come a global or one world food supply.
- Reply to this comment



