Comments on: FDA Considers Engineered Animals For Food
Agency Will Accept Industry Proposals To Sell The Public Animals With Mixed DNA
- DEBATE ANYBODY ON WHY GEORGE W. BUSH SHOULD BE PRESIDENT ANOTHER 8 YEARS !!!!!!!
Posted by twalk1122
Hey, that''s funny stuff... - Reply to this comment
- Where is your sense of adventure? Have we totally lost our Pioneer Spirit?
We stand at the precipice of a Brave, New World, and you want to sit down???
Posted by TheVicar1 at 02:09 PM : Sep 18, 2008
-------------------
You lead the way! When your hair falls out, and you sprout pustules all over your body that ooze green slime, and you foam at the mouth while running around trying to hack everyone with a butcher knife; I''ll do the kind thing, I''ll put you down like a mad sheep dog! Because---that''s what friends are for! - Reply to this comment
- How about engineering a chicken that''ll keep my house clean, make my meals and go away...
- Reply to this comment
- "The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said Thursday a government review will ensure that such animals are safe to eat"
Just like DDT, then Agent Orange, then sachharin, now with aspartame. Sure, trust the government to make sure what big money wants to sell is safe....!
I wonder what other marvelous changes will be implemented in this waning Bush era of special interests ruling America and de-regulation of anything that might get in their way? Scary! - Reply to this comment
- "Profit before Health", it is the motto of the FDA.
- Reply to this comment
- "......DEBATE ANYBODY ON WHY GEORGE W. BUSH SHOULD BE PRESIDENT ANOTHER 8 YEARS !!!!!!" Posted by twalk1122
excuse me....i just puked - Reply to this comment
- ... the Giant Asteroid on collision course with Earth will remove any trace of this stuff....
Posted by singinrich at 02:20 PM : Sep 18, 2008
Can we make that a hemorrhoid instead? Somewhat lesser evil... - Reply to this comment
- Excerpt from the article:
The administration''s position then, as now, was that it considered such foods safe for human consumption and therefore did not require labels. But in the face of some consumer backlash, then FDA Commissioner Dr. Jane Henney told CBS News that the agency was considering requiring labels.
"I think that a label might be one of the questions we want to explore." Dr. Henney said.
But in the end, the industry won out, as food makers sold the idea that a genetic label would brand safe foods as poison.
Bottom line: You will NOT know if your food has been genetically modified. Even if you want to avoid it, you can''t. - Reply to this comment
- Excerpt from the article:
The administration''s position then, as now, was that it considered such foods safe for human consumption and therefore did not require labels. But in the face of some consumer backlash, then FDA Commissioner Dr. Jane Henney told CBS News that the agency was considering requiring labels.
"I think that a label might be one of the questions we want to explore." Dr. Henney said.
But in the end, the industry won out, as food makers sold the idea that a genetic label would brand safe foods as poison.
Bottom line: You will NOT know if your food has been genetically modified. Even if you want to avoid it, you can''t. - Reply to this comment
- I think people should be executed when they turn 50. That way it would save food and there would be no need for social security, retirement centers. We wouldnt even have a gas shortage -------------------------------------------- Posted by scallywag8
Plus, we could make a TON OF MONEY selling phoney birth certificates! - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




