Comments on: Does Global Warming Mean Fewer Hurricanes?

U.S. Government Study: Warmer Waters May Lessen Chances Of Hurricanes Hitting Land

Add a Comment See all 199 Comments
by erasmus6 January 23, 2008 7:04 PM EST
"jim, realizing he is losing credibility fast, runs away." posted by global_chick

Actually it''s more like he''s just getting tired of talking to a brick wall.

Reply to this comment
by global_chick January 23, 2008 7:04 PM EST
Mars is warming, NASA scientists report.
http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17977

Must be the SUVs the Martians drive.
Reply to this comment
by global_chick January 23, 2008 7:02 PM EST
Erasmus, don''t challenge me -- challenge the claims I am posting from noted and accomplished scientists. Or is everyone a shill for oil?
Reply to this comment
by global_chick January 23, 2008 7:01 PM EST
Vaclav Klaus, president of the Czech Republic, argues in the Financial Times that ambitious environmentalism is the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity. Mr Klaus writes that %u201Cglobal warming hysteria has become a prime example of the truth versus propaganda problem%u201D and the issue %u201Cis more about social than natural sciences and more about man and his freedom than about tenths of a degree Celsius changes in average global temperature.%u201D
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/e9df7200-19c7-11dc-99c5-000b5df10621.html



Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 January 23, 2008 7:01 PM EST
"...instead of being spoon-fed by politicians." posted by global_chick

Actually I am going by the scientists NOT the politicians.

Reply to this comment
by global_chick January 23, 2008 7:00 PM EST
Biologists, too, have gotten into the act. In January, Paul Reiter, an active skeptic of global warming%u2019s effects and director of the insects and infectious diseases unit of the Pasteur Institute in Paris, faulted Mr. Gore for his portrayal of global warming as spreading malaria.

%u201CFor 12 years, my colleagues and I have protested against the unsubstantiated claims,%u201D Dr. Reiter wrote in The International Herald Tribune. %u201CWe have done the studies and challenged the alarmists, but they continue to ignore the facts.%u201D

Reply to this comment
by global_chick January 23, 2008 6:58 PM EST
jim, realizing he is losing credibility fast, runs away.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 January 23, 2008 6:58 PM EST
"erasmus, if you keep arguing with me, I will not paint your room green. I will paint it mauve." posted by hawksprings

That''s okay, green and mauve (purple) are my favorite colors!

Reply to this comment
by global_chick January 23, 2008 6:57 PM EST
Geologists have documented age upon age of climate swings, and some charge Mr. Gore with ignoring such rhythms.

%u201CNowhere does Mr. Gore tell his audience that all of the phenomena that he describes fall within the natural range of environmental change on our planet,%u201D Robert M. Carter, a marine geologist at James Cook University in Australia, said in a September blog. %u201CNor does he present any evidence that climate during the 20th century departed discernibly from its historical pattern of constant change.%u201D

Reply to this comment
by hawksprings January 23, 2008 6:57 PM EST
jimfinster,

What page should I read in the IPCC report that shows the proof that CO2 increases will increase the planet''s temps?


The Man Made Global Warming Bandwagon''s wheels are starting to fall off as it''s predictions don''t come true and are constantly changed
Reply to this comment
by jimfinster January 23, 2008 6:57 PM EST
Gotta go, I can feel my neuron count decreasing as I reply to you good folks.

Reply to this comment
by mike71067 January 23, 2008 6:57 PM EST
The crowd of lemmings who are still falling for this "global warming" crapp are the same people who think that JFK was shot by more than one gunman.

It will go down in history like this:

The earth is flat.
We never really went to the moon.
The "grassy knoll"
"Global warming"
Reply to this comment
by global_chick January 23, 2008 6:56 PM EST
Roy Spencer, a climatologist at the University of Alabama, Huntsville, said on a blog that Mr. Gore%u2019s film did %u201Cindeed do a pretty good job of presenting the most dire scenarios.%u201D But the June report, he added, shows %u201Cthat all we really know is that we are warmer now than we were during the last 400 years.%u201D

Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 January 23, 2008 6:56 PM EST
"Now an article saying that man-made global warming will produce less hurricanes." posted by hawksprings

Hmmm, I can see that I am going to have to start calling you radiob and ToolMangler. They also like to twist and turn what I say into what they want it to say.

I did NOT say that there would be LESS hurricanes, I said there wouldn''t necessarily be MORE hurricanes, just STRONGER hurricanes.
Reply to this comment
by global_chick January 23, 2008 6:55 PM EST
A report last June by the National Academies seemed to contradict Mr. Gore%u2019s portrayal of recent temperatures as the highest in the past millennium. Instead, the report said, current highs appeared unrivaled since only 1600, the tail end of a temperature rise known as the medieval warm period.
Reply to this comment
by jimfinster January 23, 2008 6:55 PM EST
Richard S. Lindzen, a well-known oil industry shill. Yep that settles it once again!


Reply to this comment
by global_chick January 23, 2008 6:54 PM EST
Richard S. Lindzen, a climatologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a member of the National Academy of Sciences, who has long expressed skepticism about dire climate predictions, accused Mr. Gore in The Wall Street Journal of %u201Cshrill alarmism.%u201D
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/science/13gore.html?pagewanted=2&8dpc&_r=1
Reply to this comment
by jimfinster January 23, 2008 6:53 PM EST
Kevin Vranes supports global warming theory. Whoops, you should have actually read his work, huh?

Reply to this comment
by global_chick January 23, 2008 6:53 PM EST
Erasmus, I have pointed to MANY notable scientists who disagree or question the global warming theory. Perhaps you need to do some research about what the other side says, instead of being spoon-fed by politicians.

James E. Hansen, an environmental scientist, director of NASA%u2019s Goddard Institute for Space Studies and a top adviser to Mr. Gore, said, %u201CAl does an exceptionally good job of seeing the forest for the trees,%u201D adding that Mr. Gore often did so %u201Cbetter than scientists.%u201D

Still, Dr. Hansen said, the former vice president%u2019s work may hold %u201Cimperfections%u201D and %u201Ctechnical flaws.%u201D He pointed to hurricanes, an icon for Mr. Gore, who highlights the devastation of Hurricane Katrina and cites research suggesting that global warming will cause both storm frequency and deadliness to rise. Yet this past Atlantic season produced fewer hurricanes than forecasters predicted (five versus nine), and none that hit the United States.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/science/13gore.html?_r=1&8dpc&oref=slogin
Reply to this comment
by jimfinster January 23, 2008 6:52 PM EST
I''''m still trying to find the part in the report where it is shown that rising CO2 levels will cause the wrath and destruction they are predicting.
Can you find it for me?
Posted by hawksprings

Clue for you: you will need to read the report first :)

Reply to this comment
See all 199 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Iran OKs 10 New Uranium Enrichment Sites

    (253 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: