Comments on: Is EPA Playing Dirty With Clean Air Law?

Schwarzenegger, Others To Sue Agency Over Its Denial Of Stricter Auto Emissions Rules

Add a Comment See all 47 Comments
by caballoverde December 22, 2007 3:15 AM EST
Capitalism breeds this sort of thing when insufficiently regulated. Changes in the relationship between industry & power may be the only way to prevent the biosphere from becoming inhospitable to humanity. Impeach W. while there''s still time!
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 December 22, 2007 2:36 AM EST
"Where Bush differs from the scientists is Bush recognizes global warming is a problem, but he doesn''''''''t favor spending money to address the problem." Posted by alphaa10

I don''''t believe it is spending money, so much as the fact that the necessary changes to our industries will result in cash flows being altered to new businesses, disrupting the profits of the old obsolete ones that own Bush at present.

A self professed "conservative" Bush is against progress, and for preserving old, and no longer useful or efficient ways of doing business. The "old money" is the group that pays his bribery allotment.
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica December 22, 2007 1:41 AM EST
Knew I''d see Cheney''s name in this.

"Screw the planet, our money first!" is a lousy attitude.

Heck, even Hitler seemed to only want to kill subsets of the human race.

People like Cheney want to kill us all.
Reply to this comment
by ontheleft December 22, 2007 12:58 AM EST
"clear the air of real (dirty) pollutants"

What are you? A moron? A car that gets better mileage will also pollute less. DUH. I''m not going to argue whether or not CO is a pollutant. There are a hell of a lot of other pollutants that are spewed into the air by automobiles. I was disgusted on a recent trip to Joshua Tree Monument to see how the pollution from LA makes it that far east and fouls such a pristine area. No matter where you live you are breathing pollution from fossil fuels and up goes your cancer risk as well as numerous other health hazards. The pollution eventually makes it into the water supply as well. I''m sure you''re not concerned about any of this.

Reply to this comment
by beehive21-2009 December 22, 2007 12:07 AM EST
EPA,DEA,cost lots of $$$ to the taxpayers,lets us abolish both these runaway monsters,they appear to no longer be in tune with the universe at everyones expense.how do we terminate , stop feeding is the EPA and DEA today..Bush is not the problem he started neither .Hopefully his legacy is ,to help rid the USA of DEA and the EPA.
Reply to this comment
by spargle December 21, 2007 11:55 PM EST
As a 29 year veteran of EPA, this is just the latest totally political decision that overrides career staff knowledge and guidance. Steve should know better - but he''s just another politico, looking out for his master - W.
Reply to this comment
by lawyertom1 December 21, 2007 11:51 PM EST
Is EPA Playing Dirty With Clean Air Law? Duh.
Reply to this comment
by SafePCUser December 21, 2007 11:38 PM EST
Another outrage from the incredibly corrupt Bush Administration.

To anyone one who denies or disputes the fact of human-caused global warming visit my blog at http://theearthblog.spaces.live.com and click the numerous science links.
Reply to this comment
by SafePCUser December 21, 2007 11:34 PM EST
Another outrage from the incredibly corrupt Bush Administration.

To anyone one who denies or disputes the fact of human-caused global warming visit my blog at http://theearthblog.spaces.live.com and click the numerous science links.
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 December 21, 2007 11:15 PM EST
andor3 said, "Concentrated CO2 can be deadly to animals and humans... Regulation of CO2 emissions has to be included in any air quality measure."
---
Points well taken. Based on certain posts from the shrinking circle of Bush defenders, it''s clear the Flat Earth Society is thriving. Such posters conclude any matter-- especially global warming-- can be reduced to a matter of mere politics in the scientific community.

Even a grade schooler has better understanding than they about global warming. And even Bush acknowledges much of global warming is man-made and remediable, and has issued public statements to that effect.

Said Bush, "Each country needs to recognize that we must reduce our greenhouse gases..."

Where Bush differs from the scientists is Bush recognizes global warming is a problem, but he doesn''''t favor spending money to address the problem.

Denial of global warming is a pet GOP cause, because taking responsible measures against climate change threatens the GOP cash cow of Big Oil. Ultimately, the GOP argument against global warming is about money, not science.

Ironically enough, any postponement of climate measures will be even more costly for all of us, GOP bozos included.

Reply to this comment
by DrColes December 21, 2007 11:03 PM EST
U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007
http://tinyurl.com/2dv6nz
Reply to this comment
by andor3 December 21, 2007 10:42 PM EST
"Well andor3, you tell these scientists that CO2 is air pollution..."

No you have it backwards! Scientists tell US that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. It is easy to find the references. And please stop posting that silly weblink since the stuff it points to has long ago been exposed as nonsense.

I am not sure what point you are trying to make, but looks like you are just trying to interfere with real discussion. Concentrated CO2 can be deadly to animals and humans. It causes all kinds of problems in the atmosphere. Regulation of CO2 emissions has to be included in any air quality measure.
Reply to this comment
by mfwtf December 21, 2007 10:40 PM EST
The Bush (special interest groups) administration (oxymoron) is running our country into the ground and the whole world see this.
Reply to this comment
by tfheringer December 21, 2007 10:28 PM EST
This is just another example of courts and the executive branch making legislation. It needs to end. Only congress can enact legislation that can take effect nation wide. What is wrong with the EPA are they that dense.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 December 21, 2007 10:20 PM EST
EPA = Enviornmental Pollution Agency
Reply to this comment
by mfwtf December 21, 2007 10:14 PM EST
I can''t believe what has happened to our country. It''s like a bad movie. Looks to me that its being run into the ground by big oil and other special interests groups who control Washington, including Congress, for short term gains and no concern for what kind of world we will leave future generations. America is in a downward trend and we continue to bring it on ourselves. What happened to government by the people? Go Arnold!
Reply to this comment
by mfwtf December 21, 2007 10:13 PM EST
I can''t believe what has happened to our country. It''s like a bad movie. Looks to me that its being run into the ground by big oil and other special interests groups who control Washington, including Congress, for short term gains and no concern for what kind of world we will leave future generations. America is in a downward trend and we continue to bring it on ourselves. What happened to government by the people? Go Arnold!
Reply to this comment
by hollyt2-2009 December 21, 2007 10:06 PM EST
EPA has always been corrupt and always will. they are just another political group.
Reply to this comment
by eddynewhope December 21, 2007 9:56 PM EST
Wow - The Environmental Protection Agency is prohibiting states from protecting the environment. Go treasonous Bush administration, go! Vote for the De-BUSH-ification of our great nation!
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 December 21, 2007 9:48 PM EST
Doesn''t the EPA has the power to pass on waivers if the state does not meet the MINIMUM EPA standards? And they STILL have the right to pass on the waiver when they more than meet their standards?

That''s hogwarsh!
Reply to this comment
See all 47 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: