Comments on: U.N. Chief: Act Now On Global Warming

Gore Addresses Delegates; Bush Skips Summit, Attends Separate Dinner

Add a Comment See all 105 Comments
by erasmus6 September 25, 2007 5:40 AM EDT
"WHEN WILL GLOBAL WARMING HIT WYOMING?" posted by hawksprings

I don''t know, but most everyone else is already witnessing it. Could it be that you just don''t WANT to see it?
Reply to this comment
by reasnmclucus September 24, 2007 11:54 PM EDT
There are no such thing as greenhouse gases with a magical power to control air temperature. Physics professor Gerhard Gerlich has disproved this claim in his essay
http://www.arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0707/0707.1161v2.pdf

Heinz Thieme has published several essays that explain this fact in a form more understandable by non-physicists.

http://my.telegraph.co.uk/reasonmclucus/september_2007/greenhouse_gases_disproved_pt_1.htm

Reply to this comment
by hawksprings September 24, 2007 9:24 PM EDT

As I sit in Cheyenne, Wyo, where it is currently 44 degrees (Farhenhiet) and the forecast for tonight is calling for a 60% chance of rain mixed with SNOW, I continue to wonder, WHEN WILL GLOBAL WARMING HIT WYOMING? I can''t afford these heating bills!

Where is Algore when you need him?

Oh, and if you hate the idea of dissent with "The Consensus", then don''t go to this link of scientists who aren''t marching in lockstep with Algore.
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/news_press_release,176495.shtml

...
Reply to this comment
by octavianfdlr September 24, 2007 7:12 PM EDT
Now we know that Global Warming is reliable science. U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has told us so. Face it, the United Nations is a respected scientific body, and the assembled presidents and premiers are all respected scientists.

NOT!

Have you noticed how much the Global Warming operatives are beginning to sound like automobile salesmen? "The time for doubt has passed." "The scientific debate is over; only the political debate remains." "Pay no attention to the little dissenting scientists behind the curtain." (OK, that last one was not a real quote.) Why are they afraid of scientific arguments?
Reply to this comment
by voteronpaul3 September 24, 2007 6:54 PM EDT
Ron Paul has it all. http://www.ronpaul2008.com/about

**** TAKE AMERICA BACK ****
**** STOP THE WAR & Corporate Corruption****

Ron Paul has it all.

He has NEVER voted:
* to raise taxes
* for an unbalanced budget
* to raise congressional pay
* for a federal restriction on gun ownership
* to increase the power of the executive branch

He HAS voted:
* against the Iraq war
* against the inappropriately named USA PATRIOT act
* against regulating the internet
* against the Military Commissions Act

He will eliminate the IRS, Wasteful Government Spending & Stop The Iraq War Immediately!

Most importantly, he voted NO on anything in Congress that is not allowed by the Constitution.

He is the only candidate not a member of the CFR!

Shouldn''''t ALL members of Congress uphold the Constitution? Aren''''t they SWORN to uphold it? You can bet Paul won''''t call the Constitution "just a G**D***ed piece of paper" like George Bush is reported to have.

If you want a candidate you can TRUST due to a proven track record, visit ronpaul2008.com and get busy spreading the word. The Mainstream Media is a lagging indicator!!

Ron Paul Revolution: http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ron+paul

Get Active join a meetup.com group today!

Also checkout http://video.google.com search for Federal Reserve Fraud
Reply to this comment
See all 105 Comments

60 Minutes

How gold pays for Congo's deadly war; Bob Ballard, the great explorer; and more.
Read More

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Poll: Rush Most Influential Conservative

    (202 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: