Comments on: Dating Study: Women Are Choosier Than Men

Researchers Conclude Men Go For Good Looks When It Comes To Choosing A Mate

[evolved_mind]

Here''s a quick lesson for guys: Chicks are more interested in the bulge in your back pocket and not the one in front: Reason: Who is best to help her progeny.

William in Colorado

[reporter21]

Give Me A Break, Looking For Love In The Wrong Places check this out at: www.poconocommunitynews.com

[kestrel9000]

If you wanna be happy
For the rest of your life,
Never make a pretty woman your wife,
So from my personal point of view,
Get an ugly girl to marry you.

A pretty woman makes her husband look small
And very often causes his downfall.
As soon as he marries her
Then she starts to do
The things that will break his heart.
But if you make an ugly woman your wife,
You''ll be happy for the rest of your life,
An ugly woman cooks her meals on time,
She''ll always give you peace of mind.

Don''t let your friends say
You have no taste,
Go ahead and marry anyway,
Though her face is ugly,
Her eyes don''t match,
Take it from me she''s a better catch.

-Jimmy Soul

[usayesterday]

Here''s how the "choosy" scale goes based on the size of clothing the woman has to wear:

Wearing size 0 - 3:
Very choosy (and knows it)

Wearing size 4 - 7:
Somewhat choosy (but is willing to overlook some things)

Wearing size 8 - 12:
Minimally choosy (but wishes they could find better)

Wearing size 13 and above:
As the saying goes: "Beggars can''t be choosers!"

[Krazcarl]

This is not news agree with armandbeni it''s amazing what hog wash studies are based on just ask 5 of your friends no need to study. The amazing thing is that people got paid for this nothing more than high class unemployment.

[andrew_693]

In another study, Republican party members were found to have more interest in homosexual activities rather than the opposite ***. They were also found to be fond of talking about being a man at the same time they hid under dad''s desk (Bush) or asked for deferments (Cheney) while crapping their pants in order to avoid serving their country (Ted nuggent). This study started in the Vietnam war and still goes on with the same results.

[incog-nito]

You need a study for THIS???

[mrrjenkins]

This study involved 46 Germans and it''s considered news? What a joke. It just goes to show how the standards for news have declined over the years. This study was not even close to scientific.

Everyone should remember a simple factor. For the 186,000 years that **** sapien sapiens (thats humans) have lived on this planet at least 7 out of 10 lived in rural areas (as in living off the land). You had better ask some farm boys and girls to take that survey. Us city folks havent had long enough to adapt to the historic realities that out species had to overcome to produce us. 1)We are the decendants of conquerors. 2) Disease and famine are the great historic culls of our populations, not nuclear war. Simply put, our choices of mates are mostly instinctual, not environmental!

[latazman]

I''ve been in Social Services for over 10 years and this article seems a bit skewed. If women are so much choosier, how you account for the huge amount of single moms where that dad is no longer present (jail or gone) or of so little use finacially that 1) mom and child lives off of social services, 2)grandparents are raising the crew or 3)the gall is busting her butt just to get by? Answer - Chooier but not always right!