Comments on: How Do States Compare On Global Warming?
A State-By-State Analysis Of Carbon Dioxide Emissions, From Most (Texas) To Least (Vermont)
Add a Comment See all 49 Comments
- jimfinster
"I do feel quite relieved now that the Fox Noise Channel has begun to expose the hoax that is so-called "Global Warming". posted by cdfoxtrot
Do you know what they are talking about? What is the Fox Noise Channel? - Reply to this comment
- What idiots believe in Global Warming?
- Reply to this comment
- Yes, like some of the other contributors, I do feel quite relieved now that the Fox Noise Channel has begun to expose the hoax that is so-called "Global Warming". As is the case with evolution, all those thousands of respected scientists must be wrong -- or, even worse, they have some lefty, socialist agenda. I think they're trying to get us all to ride bicycles. *** commies. If we don't fight them there we'll be fighting them here. Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to get back to la-la-land, and watch the rest of the Fox Noise updates.
- Reply to this comment
- And I bet you that as time goes on, more and more scientists like the ones in the link I gave are going to come out and dissagree with "The Consensus."
Posted by hawksprings at 12:34 PM : Jun 03, 2007
I thought we had this settled before.
1. CO2 is a greenhouse gas
2. we are adding huge volumes of CO2 each year
3. direct measurements show the resultant temp increase
Now, remind me again what part of this you don't believe??? - Reply to this comment
- I think global warming would go away if we could all just agree to pretend it isn%u2019t happening.
Also, did you know Barack Obama is a terrorist? His name rhymes with Osama you know.
Thank God for the Fox Noise channel. - Reply to this comment
- "My wife is always griping about how quickly the house gets dusty."
hawksprings, hawksprings, hawksprings, I am having problems with the word "griping". Us wives do not want to hear that we are "griping". - Reply to this comment
- socrates392
hawksprings may be in a bit of denial on the reality of global warming BUT I think if you were to go back and read his post AGAIN, you would find that he isn't AGAINST windmills, in fact it is the opposite. Do you need glasses? - Reply to this comment
- It figures that Bush and Cheney's adopted home states would be the biggest offenders.
- Reply to this comment
- Yah Vermont! Weeehooo! Gotta love our fake south :D
joking aside..
I hope we can all wake up and start doing something about this... I hate meeting people who don't believe that global warming isn't an issue..
they should turn off their AC for a week and see how the world feels... - Reply to this comment
The National Academy of Sciences surveyed every published, peer-reviewed global warming study done in the last ten years.
Without exception, they all agreed on three fundamental facts:
1) GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL
2) GLOBAL WARMING IS CAUSED BY MAN
3) THE CONSEQUENCES OF GLOBAL WARMING WILL BE CATASTROPHIC
The SCIENTIFIC debate has long been over. Climate experts have been in agreement on this for a long time.
The POLITICAL debate rages on thanks to the millions of dollars that the fossil-fuels industries are poring into a disinformation campaign.
Global warming is not a political issue, it's a survival issue.
The time for lies and spin is over.
The time for action is now if we are to protect our and our childrens future.- Reply to this comment
MCVet, you must be a young pup to make the statements you do. Either that or you refuse to learn from history.
In the 70's we were going in to an Ice Age that would end life as we know it.
Back in the 40's doctors would do ads telling how healthy cigarettes were for us.
Then there have been all the epidemics that were going to kill us: Swine flu, bird flu, and so many other epidemics I can't remember them all, probably because of all the alar on my apples.
In the early 1970's I was told that by the end of the 1990's there would be no more drinking water left and the atmosphere would be too poisonous to breath and that we would not have enough food for the world's projected population.
The "experts" have been predicting doom and gloom so many times for so many years, and Global Warming Hysteria is just another one in a long line of them.
And I bet you that as time goes on, more and more scientists like the ones in the link I gave are going to come out and dissagree with "The Consensus."- Reply to this comment
- The Republcans don't believe in Science. They only trust superstition. Republicans still believe the world is flat and located at the center of the Universe. If you don't believe me, check their mouthpiece of a *** news agancy Fox News or maybe it should be Faux News. Heil Bush.
- Reply to this comment
- 100 years ago Edison and Ford reacted to gasoline price spikes by committing to build an electric car and transit infrastructure, but this was sabotaged in creative ways.
The battle to keep the world addicted to the fuel of the era has been going on for millennia. Look up the Hostmen of Newcastle, for example. - Reply to this comment
- I have a question for hawksprings and all those other people who think global warming is a giant liberal conspiracy-- even if you are right, what harm can there be in switching over to cleaner sources of power? What do you have against windmills? If we can power our cars off electricity from wind and solar plants, why not? Do you like high gas prices? Do you like that we are so dependant on the Saudis for oil? Do you like high power bills?
The sun and the wind are free. Hydrogen is abundant. Even nuclear power is safer and cleaner than what we have. So what's the big problem? Why do you conspiracy theorists like fossil fuels so much? Please, please, just humor us crazy liberals. Even if you are right and global warming is a fantasy, you will still end up paying less for your power. You will propbably also feel better since there will be less environmental pollutants in the air. What do you have to lose? - Reply to this comment
Is the Global Warming Consensus starting to disentigrate? Or was the "Consensus" just some doublespeak in Algore's Brave New World?
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=c47c1209-233b-412c-b6d1-5c755457a8af- Reply to this comment
Wyoming has had companies putting up windmill farms. By Rawlins there's a farm of about 200 of them you can see from I-80. South of Cheyenne just into Colorado there is a farm of about 40 you can see from I-25.
And just south of Pine Bluffs they are currently working on a wind farm that they say will have just shy of 1000 windmills!
My hope is that they will put up so many windmills around Cheyenne that it will slow the wind down some. That would be nice. Ha.- Reply to this comment
- Global warming, what a joke!!
- Reply to this comment
- I was starting to get concerned about global warming.
But then I turned on the Fox Noise Channel and they said it was all a big hoax.
What a relief! - Reply to this comment
- I feel so sick in the nasty air. Wait for a bus and the car passing by is so sick I fight for clean air. There are days I don't leave the house due to poor air out.
- Reply to this comment
- Maybe Wyoming could use a mega-investment in WindMills. I know there's an 'eyesore' component to that (as if open-pit mining isn't an eyesore), but when you're looking over a high plains area, windmills don't exactly detract the eye, but enhance the view. Wyoming has LOTS of wind, according to the posters here, and wind power is actually one of the cheapest sources of power anywhere (comesurate with coal). Yeah, and more nuclear. But, its obvious coal is going to be 'under attack' in the near future. Need technologies that turn coal into natural gas, which produces alot less CO2 when burned.
- Reply to this comment
