Comments on: Global Warming Debate Shifts To Who Pays

Release Of U.N. Report On Climate Change Switches Focus In Congress From Science To Cost

[olgreyghost]

Hey, Randal, how you doing?

It can be Shrub, it can be Hillary, it can be Obama, etc. I remember something about toilets and the substance that goes into them...

[feelfree1]

frankly6,

This 'bares' repeating:

"This is not a political issue. This is an issue of survival. It's time for those of you stuck in denial to get your head out of your Limbaugh."

Good show!

[hawksprings]

Check out the Drudge Report. There's a link there to a headline where not all scientists are drinking the Global Warming kool-aid.

[randalds]

Since government intervention causes most of the problems of mankind (and nature causes a few we have no control over) why do so many assume that government intervention can solve the problem?

Posted by OlGreyGhost at 07:43 PM : Feb 03, 2007

Maybe Bush will declare a war on global warming and give Haliburton the contract to try to fix it?

[olgreyghost]

Since government intervention causes most of the problems of mankind (and nature causes a few we have no control over) why do so many assume that government intervention can solve the problem?

[frankly6]

The National Academy of Sciences reviewed every published, peer-reviewed study on Global Warming in the last ten years. 100% of these studies agreed on three important points.

1. GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL

2. THE CONSEQUENCES OF GLOBAL WARMING WILL BE CATASTROPHIC (THINK KATRINA & WORSE)

3. GLOBAL WARMING IS CAUSED BY MAN

The scientific community has long been united on this. The so-called debate is a misinformation campaign financed and promoted by fossil fuel industries.

This is not a political issue. This is an issue of survival. It's time for those of you stuck in denial to get your head out of your Limbaugh.

[processor2]

Global Warming Debate Shifts To WHO PAYS

And that, ladies & gentlemen, is what "global warming" is really all about. A form of global socialism to make the USA pay for its "ways", and to re-distribute wealth (a tenet of communism) to the rest of the world.

A similar story circulated in the early 1970's,, So-called "social" scientists insisted the earth was experiencing "global cooling" and headed for disaster & possible ice-age; and of course, the U.S. was expected to pay for its "ways".

....

[bildooreilly]

You never did present any facts to support your "theories" either Jim... why is that?

[bildooreilly]

Yep there you go Jim, claiming I'm dumb and running off... but anyone can reread through the posts and see I outwitted you lol

[jimfinster]

Figured as much. You simply don't have the educational background to understand these issues. Good luck and signing off...