Comments on: Web Site Restores "Abortion" Search Term

Reproductive Health Site Funded By Gov't Was Slammed For Restricting Use Of Word In Searches

Most everyone agrees that child abuse is wrong, and that abortion is not the best first choice. So what if everyone who is opposed to termination of pregnancy was to sign up to adopt ANY unwanted child. This would, of course, include currently unwanted children in the foster care system, orphans and others. No give-backs or refusals.

[intrigued2]

I don''t even understand what Moral4_U is going on about. But as far as I''m concerned, any government that censors anything other than information necessary for major national security issues CANNOT call itself a democracy. The issue here isn''t really about abortion, it''s about censorship.

[teaforthree]

This repeated argument is getting off-track from free access to information on debatable topics in a free democratic society. Since the TheMorale4_U has brought their argument up several times, I''ll respond with a few questions as well. A fanatic should sue on behalf of a rapist? A fanatic should subject a child to a life of disability? A fanatic should subject a husband and wife to a life of hardship when they can try conceiving a child without disabilities at a later point in time? A fanatic should force women to have illegal, unsafe abortions? Abortion is an after-the-fact form of birth control. Many effective forms of birth control exist. In recent history it''s never been the case that droves of women are beating down the abortionist''s door for an abortion. Due to it''s nature, it is not something that will be abused.

[themorale4_u]

A lawyer should sue on the behalf of the baby in the womb? When two people say yes to having sxx they are making a contract to what results from the union. So if a baby is conceived the baby has the rights guaranteed under the binding contract of the union. Another words the baby has rights as a person because of the union, agreement! A binding contract is when two people agree to a course of action, a pledge if you will!

Posted by God_vs_Self at 02:01 PM : Apr 06, 2008


Sounds like a good concept for lawyers and the constitution to get on board and fight this all the way to the supreme court! Do you think these two will win?
This reminds me of a H-T-L-E-R movie were all the Jews were put to death by choice! I think we referred to it as an atrocity,

[teaforthree]

Thankfully we live in a democratic society rather than a faith / belief-based society as in other parts of the world. The ability to construct arguments with free access to ALL of the data is necessary for a functional democracy. If we allow censorship on a hot button item like this, we may as live under a dictatorship / religious republic.

[themorale4u]

Here''''s a thought: How about we make sure that all of the babies that are actually born are SAFE and LOVED. Once we have achieved that goal, let''''s worry about abortion.

Study Finds Abuse in One of 43 Babies

By REUTERS
Published: April 4, 2008
WASHINGTON (Reuters) %u2014 About one of every 43 American infants is physically abused or neglected annually, and those babies are especially at risk in the first week of their lives, health officials said Thursday.


Posted by intrigued2 at 02:14 PM : Apr 07, 2008

OK so you would of aborted yourself? Why do you care about others problems if your not really concerned about an aborted baby. Your a hypocrite in my book. Your good talk is just for your self talk! Why bother posting for this story at all?

[intrigued2]

Here''s a thought: How about we make sure that all of the babies that are actually born are SAFE and LOVED. Once we have achieved that goal, let''s worry about abortion.

Study Finds Abuse in One of 43 Babies

By REUTERS
Published: April 4, 2008
WASHINGTON (Reuters) %u2014 About one of every 43 American infants is physically abused or neglected annually, and those babies are especially at risk in the first week of their lives, health officials said Thursday.

[themorale4u]

Posted by newsterl at 08:57 AM : Apr 07, 2008

Do you ever wish you were one of the 5000? Seriously now. Maybe you would be fighting for your own life with only a garbage can to look out of?

[themorale4u]

A lawyer should sue on the behalf of the baby in the womb? When two people say yes to having sxx they are making a contract to what results from the union. So if a baby is conceived the baby has the rights guaranteed under the binding contract of the union. Another words the baby has rights as a person because of the union, agreement! A binding contract is when two people agree to a course of action, a pledge if you will!

Posted by God_vs_Self at 02:01 PM : Apr 06, 2008


Sounds like a good concept for lawyers and the constitution to get on board and fight this all the way to the supreme court! Do you think these two will win?
This reminds me of a H-T-L-E-R movie were all the Jews were put to death by choice! I think we referred to it as an atrocity,

[teaforthree]

I''m a believer in quality over quantity and tend to lean pro-choice despite upcoming social security and attrition warfare concerns. Regardless, how will pro-lifers do research if they can''t access information? Wouldn''t a balanced argument based on facts be more convincing?