Comments on: Web Site Restores "Abortion" Search Term

Reproductive Health Site Funded By Gov't Was Slammed For Restricting Use Of Word In Searches

[providence_z]

A lawyer should sue on the behalf of the baby in the womb? When two people say yes to having sxx they are making a contract to what results from the union. So if a baby is conceived the baby has the rights guaranteed under the binding contract of the union. Another words the baby has rights as a person because of the union, agreement! A binding contract is when two people agree to a course of action, a pledge if you will!

Posted by God_vs_Self at 02:01 PM : Apr 06, 2008


Sounds like a good concept for lawyers and the constitution to get on board and fight this all the way to the supreme court! Do you think these two will win?
This reminds me of a H-T-L-E-R movie were all the Jews were put to death by choice! I think we referred to it as an atrocity,

[providence_d]

Do you ever wish you were one of the 5000 babies killed every day in America? Seriously now. Maybe you would be fighting for your own life with only a garbage can to look out of and a dead baby sister or brother to crawl up unto and die?

[newsterl]

Memory starts after language acquisition. If I were one of the 5000, I wouldn''''t remember it.

Posted by diabetes80

Thats true, and that explains why no one ever remembers being in the womb or coming out the birth canal (or trough as the case may be if it was widened by lots of guys ;)
You also dont remember a thing about circumcision either.

[teaforthree]

If POPLINE is receiving federal funding to provide academic-grade information, it shouldn''t be promoting special interest advocacy results. Results that are not objective should be removed. The search term shouldn''t have been removed altogether. USAID is a government organization and abortion is legal in this country at the federal level though limited to varying degrees at the state level. Why would federal funding be questioned if the two questionable advocacy items were removed? Pardon the pun, but POPLINE threw the baby out with the bath water on this one.

[teaforthree]

Memory starts after language acquisition. If I were one of the 5000, I wouldn''t remember it. I''m glad I was allowed to research that little tidbit of information.

[newsterl]

When you add in the subsequent babies I left out there, and/or you increase the "one" to TWO for some of the women the number WOULD BE around 600 million at least, double what it is now.
Where the Hel1 do you think all those people are going to live, work, and where DOUBLE the food, water, electric, waste disposal, landfill space and all the rest is going to COME FROM Rick?
We already have shortages of everything from clean water to electric, oil, land, farmland being built over for condos and malls and the list goes on.
Maybe YOU would like a world as depicted in "Logans Run" where you can only live to age 21 and are executed to make room for more BABIES, or "Soylent Green" but most people WOULDNT- it would be hel1 on earth.

[newsterl]

U.S. Population Projections: 2005-2050

If current trends continue, the population of the United States will rise to 438 million in 2050, from 296 million in 2005, and 82% of the increase will be due to immigrants arriving from 2005 to 2050 and their U.S.-born descendants, according to new projections developed by the Pew Research Center.

Of the 117 million people added to the population during this period due to the effect of new immigration, 67 million will be the immigrants themselves and 50 million will be their U.S.-born children or grandchildren.
==

Now if you add 5,000 a day by outlawing abortion;

438 million in 2050 +1,825,000 /Yr 2010 thru 2050 =73,000,000 added persons, PLUS the babies those in turn would have that otherwise would never have been born. Figuring half are females= roughly 36,000,000 rounded out. The ones born in 2010 would be having babies around 2030 and the first crop of that bunch would having babies of their own by 2050. At the very least just going by ONE child per female and not including their babies in turn- that 36 million becomes 72.5 million ADDED to the projected
438 million comes to at least 510.5 million.

[newsterl]

Do you ever wish you were one of the 5000 babies killed every day in America?

Posted by Providence_Y

If I was you moron, I wouldnt know the difference one way or the other- Id be DEAD now WOULDNT I RICK!

[providence_y]

Posted by newsterl at 08:57 AM : Apr 07, 2008

Do you ever wish you were one of the 5000 babies killed every day in America? Seriously now. Maybe you would be fighting for your own life with only a garbage can to look out of and a dead baby sister or brother to crawl up unto and die?

[providence_y]

A lawyer should sue on the behalf of the baby in the womb? When two people say yes to having sxx they are making a contract to what results from the union. So if a baby is conceived the baby has the rights guaranteed under the binding contract of the union. Another words the baby has rights as a person because of the union, agreement! A binding contract is when two people agree to a course of action, a pledge if you will!

Posted by God_vs_Self at 02:01 PM : Apr 06, 2008


Sounds like a good concept for lawyers and the constitution to get on board and fight this all the way to the supreme court! Do you think these two will win?
This reminds me of a H-T-L-E-R movie were all the Jews were put to death by choice! I think we referred to it as an atrocity,