Comments on: Study: 1 In 4 U.S. Teen Girls Has STD
First-Ever Study Of Age Group Finds Virus For Cervical Cancer Is Most Common Infection
- What u doing between the the legs of the young girls,perverts.
- Reply to this comment
- OMG, I forgot they censor the word k-n-o-b!
- Reply to this comment
- "That''''s because girls ARE the problem.....they decide if the boys get any or not, and if an STD is going to be spread." Posted by shanev137
Hmmm, I think if we were to just cut off your diddle ***, the problem would be solved!:) - Reply to this comment
Abstenance only education has proven again and again not to work. It''s just immoral not to give these kids the information they can use to protect themselves. The stakes are too high.- Reply to this comment
- Bought and payed for study by the company (Merck) that wants every state to make it law they get their shot to prevent your child from getting this new STD that causes "cervical cancer".
Keep paying those lobbyists Merck, you''re making the news with the typical fear mongering. - Reply to this comment
- Call me old fashioned,but I think we were a lot better off back when "sexually liberated women" were called w*h*o*r*e*s.
Posted by jesterbelle at 12:31 AM : Mar 12, 2008
You hit the nail on the head. Couldn''t have said it better. Perception of promiscuity has changed. It is now considered morally acceptable to hop from one bed to the other. Back in my teen days (by the way, was less than 10yrs ago) girls like that were laughed at and made fun of. No respectable guy would date them and no respectable girl would befriend them. Thus, because there were unwanted consequences, most girls did not make the trip around the entire block. They were also afraid of the taboo of teen pregnancy, and the consequences of being a kid and trying to raise one. But now parents and government will do that for you. - Reply to this comment
- Hey Vermont, wanna give out some more birth control pills? Hey, Maine, wanna hand condoms out to the middle schoolers? Sounds good. Let''s have the little kiddies thoroughly diseased so the country won''t have to worry about a population increase for all the sterility. Hey, it works for Al Bore''s global warming theory.
- Reply to this comment
- Dey be nuttin but dirty lil'' HO''s. Dang!! Y''all gots to be wearin'' a wet suit if you goes after dat young stuff anymoe. Dang!
- Reply to this comment
- Call me old fashioned,but I think we were a lot better off back when "sexually liberated women" were called w*h*o*r*e*s.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jesterbelle at 12:31 AM : Mar 12, 2008
+ report abuse
Okay I''ll go one better.. you''re not old fashioned you''re a freegin NAZI! How''s that? S-e-x is part of life, it''s a HUMAN function and trying to make S-e-x between kids in the back seat on a saturday night something "Dirty" like this mental midget wants isn''t going to help at all. One of the things about those years is the excitment of doing what you''re not supposed to do. Didn''t work in the 50''s still doesn''t. EDUCATION is the ANSWER people... Not witch hunts or attempts to stop what has never been stopped. Sieg Heil and Amen. - Reply to this comment
- If half the energy expended in the anti-tobacco campaign was spent educating our youth on the down side of having *** outside of a loving and committed relationship, we would see a huge decline.
H*ll, they want to distribute birth control pill to middle school age kids. Smoking cigarettes is evil, teens having casual *** is ok. What a warped world we live in.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by rohink at 12:43 AM : Mar 12, 2008
+ report abuse
So YOU think going back to the 50''s is the answer? LOL We need to educate these kids not try some Nazi Youth Garbage on them. Comparing S-e-x to the use of Tobacco, somehow, doesn''t give me great hope that fascist like this bozo have the answer. LOL We laughted at stunts like that when we were teens and I have no doubt it would have the same results today. Sieg Heil and Amen - Reply to this comment
- This is what you get from a country that is so prudish you cannot even type the word S*E*X in this forum. Enjoy your herpes, fellow prudish Americans!
- Reply to this comment
- This is what 7 years of abstinence only *** education has bought us. Yet another unintended consequence of letting religious views trump science.
- Reply to this comment
- If half the energy expended in the anti-tobacco campaign was spent educating our youth on the down side of having *** outside of a loving and committed relationship, we would see a huge decline.
H*ll, they want to distribute birth control pill to middle school age kids. Smoking cigarettes is evil, teens having casual *** is ok. What a warped world we live in. - Reply to this comment
- Nothing new or unusual about this story, people have been engaging in acts of procreation ever since there were people, and the onset of puberty is still regarded in many cultures as the onset of adulthood. (Bar Mitzvah, etc.) In short, if you can make a baby, you are an adult.
It is the result of hypocritical and arrogant mind control by societies'' institutions, both religious and secular, that has led so many to foolishly think otherwise, that somehow nature must conform to their own ideas. - Reply to this comment
- Call me old fashioned,but I think we were a lot better off back when "sexually liberated women" were called w*h*o*r*e*s.
- Reply to this comment
- The real truth is many teens are s.e.x.u.a.l.l.y active as if STDs don''t exist, alarming but true!
- Reply to this comment
- WHY are there no mention about sexual activity of teenage boys, or STDS with boys and their contribution to the problem.
---------------
That''s because girls ARE the problem.....they decide if the boys get any or not, and if an STD is going to be spread. - Reply to this comment
- So, why don''t women want guys to receive the HPV vaccine (even though tens of thousands of us are anyway)? I mean, is it because they know it will prevent penile cancer, which is also caused by HPV, as well as anal cancer, not to mention genital warts? And, women can''t stand the thought the men might benefit from something that they benefit from, too. Think I''m exaggerating? When a local guy went public about having received the vaccine, the health nurses in one backward Ohio county wrote a scathing critique of the individual''s actions, claiming that it wasn''t approved for men (even though it is okay for men to take it "off label" and out of pocket) so they shouldn''t. Okay, girls, if you say so.
- Reply to this comment
- olebd - the same can go for any vice, including greed.
Still, it''s what people do and therefore it''s nobody else''s business.
Then the same a-holes rant and whine about the high crime rate, prevalence of rudeness and other things, and so on. All that stems because of a lack of family and the problem IS compounded today.
"It takes a village" is true to an extent, but is it wrong to be quoting a fellow Democrat, particularly when lots of people being obstreperous fools say what other people do is nobody else''s business? If smoking is everyone else''s business because others'' lives are indirectly affected... Liberal hypocrisy; it''s as simple as that. (I''m a moderate Dem, and I think both our candidates are as well. Hopefully.) - Reply to this comment
- People have $ex. What''''s your plan now?
Posted by jumkey
-------------------
Taunt anti-social losers, I suppose. Obviously, you don''t want to listen or give a ***. All you want to do is get off. Fair enough, you go and have a nice life. If you get (for example) HIV, you better be d*mn sure to tell everyone you want to s**e* beforehand. People who willfully spread fatal diseases still get locked up in jail for 2nd degree murder, fortunately... - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




