Comments on: Stem Cell Breakthrough Avoids Embryo Use
U.S., Japanese Scientists Report Success With Human Skin Cells; May Halt Cloning Controversies
- Funny, you wacks blame Bush for global warming too. How about cancer, why not blame him for that? Ooh, ooh animal testing, let''''s blame him for that...how''''s about the fact that you''''re an idiot...let''''s blame him for that too.
Posted by katg21 at 08:44 PM : Nov 20, 2007
I beg your pardon. Where did I say that Bush was to blame for global warming? He is to blame for 7 years of no advancement in dealing with it, preferring to stick his head in the sand like global warming doesn''t exist. - Reply to this comment
- BUSH has ALWAYS supported stem-cell research
IF it did not involve killing babies.
This will make the liberals mad because it doesn''''t kill babies.
.
Posted by MCVett at 08:39 PM : Nov 20, 2007
No stem cell research has ever used babies. You should get out of your cave once in a while and you wouldn''t show your ignorance.... - Reply to this comment
- Some of us are smart enough to know what to blame Lil Bush for, and not what to blame him for. Did he lie to us about Saddam and al-Qaeda, did he lie to us about WMDs? And tell me this, if terror is so important, why did he let Osama bin Laden get away?
No, he''s not to blame for all of it, but he sure has more in his column, than you seem to see. - Reply to this comment
- Now if someone can just come up with a fix for the damage done over the same period as a result of Dubya''''s burying his head in the sand regarding global warmingPosted by formrusmcsgt
Funny, you wacks blame Bush for global warming too. How about cancer, why not blame him for that? Ooh, ooh animal testing, let''s blame him for that...how''s about the fact that you''re an idiot...let''s blame him for that too. - Reply to this comment
- BUSH has ALWAYS supported stem-cell research
IF it did not involve killing babies.
This will make the liberals mad because it doesn''t kill babies.
. - Reply to this comment
- BUSH has ALWAYS supported stem-cell research
IF it did not involve killing babies.
This will make the liberals mad because it doesn''t kill babies.
. - Reply to this comment
- Only if you ask a liberal or watch our left leaning media. As I see it we haven''''t been attacked since 9/11, we are winning the war in Iraq, job creation is high, unemployment is low, interest rates are low, taxes are low and all of this while we are fighting the most difficult war of our lives against terrorism.
Posted by katg21
I see you been drinking the koolaide, too. We haven''t been attacked since 9/11 because we wouldn''t have been attacked then, if it hadn''t have been an inside job. What have we won in Iraq? Wheres the gold mine? Jobs are being created in the service area, where the average wage is minimum wage. Do a little reading on unemployment, and you will find that there are thousands who are unemployed, but not listed on the record, because their unemployment benefits have been exhausted. As for the war on terror, the threat today is no more than it was 20 years ago, but they got you all hyped on it. That koolaide must be good. As for how great the economy is doing, have you noticed how the DJIA has lost over a 1000 points? Have you seen the billions that banks are writing off? Are you aware of how many folks are losing their homes?
He11 no you aren''t, you been to busy patting yourself on the back, and acting all religious. - Reply to this comment
- BUSH has ALWAYS supported stem-cell research
IF it did not involve killing babies.
This will make the liberals mad because it doesn''t kill babies.
. - Reply to this comment
- BUSH has ALWAYS supported stem-cell research
IF it did not involve killing babies.
This will make the liberals mad because it doesn''t kill babies.
. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




