70 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Gecko5 says:
After watching this site for months I have come to notice a little yippy dog that never really engages in the topic at hand but prefers to run around the room and nip at the ankles of those having a serious discussion, although I will admit that some of that discussion is more cocktail chatter. The dog is not very big and poses no real threat to even the skinniest of ankles and is not even that loud but on occasion can be irritating if only because it sometimes interrupts the discussion. I have also notice that fairly regularly this dog becomes incontinent and ends up messing on everyone's shoes. Unfortunately all one can do is say bad dog and clean your shoes.
reply
finkfurst replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
None of the dogs on here can possibly pose any threat whatsoever to anyone, so why don't you say what you really mean? Honest people are not afraid to give their real opinions..... are you?
Gecko5 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The thing about puppies is that there very clumsy and not very bright and will react to almost anything. If you play your cards right you can usually sucker them in to almost anything. I have a box of puppy treats, watch me have fun with this little dog.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Unclemercer says:
Stop calling Afghanis "insurgents". Afghanistan is their country. They were murdered by foreigh "insurgents".
reply
AOCGUY replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
By the strict definition of insurgent, the Taliban technically fit taht description but only because they are not the recoginized government of Afghanistan. Since an insurgency is the armed rebellion against the government, NATO's attack also did not fit the definition of insurgency either. Like it or not, since the Karzai government is the internatioanlly recognized govt of Afghanistan, any Afghan led rebellion against that govt would have to be considered an insurgency and thus the Taliban being insurgents.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
brianbwb2011 says:
Anyone justifying this is a psychopath, according to the official, internationally recognized definition of the term.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mysteriousjz says:
A Question: Over the injured and dead mutilated, burned bodies of men, women, children and babies, did the military enjoy mast****tion? Do those mad dog military supporters and fear, warmongers also like to join the j**k circle?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
akinos2009 says:
That's why you are leaderless, ladderless

There is no right to kill innocent people.you have to find your adversary and separate him from the bystanders. That so called Afghan army we are training will be pay-rolled by the United States for years to come. What about Karzai, do you think he is getting his salary from the Afghan tax payer? Not far is the big boys, China, India, Viet Nam and Russia. They are taking note of the heart and character of the United States, the sweet land of Liberty.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kbbpll says:
It would not surprise me one bit if the intelligence used to determine that these buses carried insurgents came directly from the Taliban.
reply
finkfurst replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
.... and that's because you are a fool.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Berkeley-SkirtLifter says:
r_mcdonald1 never responded! oh well
reply
finkfurst replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
by Berkeley-SkirtLifter February 22, 2010 12:45 PM EST
r_mcdonald1 never responded! oh well
------------------------
.... and neither did you!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mljohns00 says:
In a joint press conference today, Mexico and the United States announced that Mexico will begin flying Israeli-built armed drones over the southwest United States. The drones will be aiding the War on Drugs and the illegal importation of firearms into Mexico. They have a range of up to 750 miles.

Mexican observers will monitor for suspicious activity with intelligence aid from the United States. When illegal activity is confirmed, missiles from the drones will be used to stop the activity.

Mexican authorities have promised that only verified criminals will be attacked by the missiles. The U.S. has stated that any claims of civilian deaths will be thorouhly investigated.
reply
Berkeley-SkirtLifter replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nice
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Berkeley-SkirtLifter says:
Hey finkfusrt,

Did you read my post from February 22, 2010 11:19 AM EST? Did you?

I hope I am not proving you right by not answering you...holy cats, that's a weird thing to say.

Read the post, February 22, 2010 11:19 AM EST, then comment please finkfurst.
reply
finkfurst replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Neither you nor r_mcdonald1 have a clue who or what you're talking about.... "Goat herding, toga wearing, bearded, poppy farming, peasants" for ****'s sake!!!!!! You're just as much of an ignorant bigot as r_mcdonald1 is. And answering the post is not the same as answering the question.

Start thinking in human terms, not stereotypes.............
Berkeley-SkirtLifter replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"Goat herding, toga wearing, bearded, poppy farming, peasants" what's wrong with that. They like what they do and want to be left alone. I'm not judging them BUT YOU ARE!

They are not ashamed to be ""Goat herding, toga wearing, bearded, poppy farming, peasants"" they are a proud people.

And if I call them "Goat herding, toga wearing, bearded, poppy farming, peasants" you get your panties in a wad. Maybe they would be more insulted by you being offended, by them being what they are, than me saying what they are.

You are offended that I called them peasants? Why are you offended? Do they offend you?

If I called a kid with low jeans on, bling, a grill, hat with no bend in the brim on sideways, a "gangsta" would you be offended?

Would you call me a racist? Your offendness comes from your own bigotry!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I_am_me1953 says:
42 people in three mini busses?
reply
Berkeley-SkirtLifter replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
yes! Clown Car Minibuses!
1/3