Comments on: Gunmen Attack Federal Forces in Mexico
Five Federal Agents, 2 Soldiers Killed in Bold, Coordinated Assault in Suspected Retaliation for Cartel Arrest
Add a Comment See all 94 Comments
- Are you ready to admit you're a flaming liberal yet, erasmutt? ROTFLMAO!
Yah, you're DREAMING of spanking me. You naughty girl. I just fascinate you. - Reply to this comment
- Spoken like a true Obamabot. LOL!
- Reply to this comment
- by stuart2020 July 12, 2009 11:02 AM PDT
It's about time you admitted what you really are.
-------------
Launching personal attacks again (and a childish one at that)?
Are you trying to get banished AGAIN???
LOL! stuart, you are like Cool Hand Luke in the boxing match.
You just don't know when you've gone too far. - Reply to this comment
- by speakinup22 July 12, 2009 9:40 AM PDT
darthcheney345 - this is happening in Mexico. I believe we can lend aid, like helicopters if requested, and training (which we are doing since Bush Presidency and I believe continuing now) but there is no way Mexico would or should tolerate any unilateral action from Obama.
Bush was in the same situation. He acted the same. So let's ratchet down the hate Obama, unless you can specifically show where he is neglegent in this arena.
Sure, I'm concerned what is happening down there, and I support the idea of a virtual fence, backed with sufficent agents (that would be good utilization of stimulus money in creating jobs), and I support the idea of a strong coast guard.
But, I'm not certain what else can be done besides monitoring the situation so it doesn't flow over the border.
Fair enough ?
yup - well said - altho darthcheney has a valid point in general about your watch, your responsibility - not in this particular case -
" Drug violence has killed more than 11,000 people nationwide since 2006, when Calderon took office."
That's a pretty loud statement of Calderon's watch, and no leadership or responsibility taken on his part to protect his people. - Reply to this comment
- by darthcheney345
Then North Korea celebrated the Fourth of July by launching SEVEN missiles in one day. That NEVER happened before Obama was president.
if you read the (NK/missle)article, it stated NK has a history of launching missles in protest on 4 july. - Reply to this comment
- by darthcheney345 July 12, 2009 6:23 AM PDT
Yah, they all disgrace themselves, so they're keeping a "low profile" so they don't drag down the whole party. But Pelosi/Obama's $50 billion GM debacle has more than made up for it, so it was a futile effort.
Nope, it's not long now before some major catastrophe happens, of 9/11 proportions. Remember how they said Bush was to blame for 9/11 because it was on "his watch?" But if something similar happens this September, don't you know they'll blame it on Bush again because he somehow "started it???"
Ok, first off, I think you are in great need of a spankin'.
Secondly, this crap all STARTED with Bush, so, YES, it will be his fault!! : ) Sometimes things start and then just gradually get worse. Just because Obama is President now, it doesn't mean that it's his fault. All this stuff could be happening no matter who was in there.
If you walked into a HUGE room that was full of junk, and you had to clean it up, where would you start? How would you go about it? I bet that every person would have a different way of tackling it. I bet they would all start in a different place, and the order in which they did it would be different.
I have always thought that Obama was weak, and not a good choice for President. But left with McCain, he was the better choice. (except for Hillary): ) The place I thought he would be weak was when it came to the terrorists. At least he was smart enough to surround himself with people that know more than he does, on certain things. - Reply to this comment
- darthcheney345 - this is happening in Mexico. I believe we can lend aid, like helicopters if requested, and training (which we are doing since Bush Presidency and I believe continuing now) but there is no way Mexico would or should tolerate any unilateral action from Obama.
Bush was in the same situation. He acted the same. So let's ratchet down the hate Obama, unless you can specifically show where he is neglegent in this arena.
Sure, I'm concerned what is happening down there, and I support the idea of a virtual fence, backed with sufficent agents (that would be good utilization of stimulus money in creating jobs), and I support the idea of a strong coast guard.
But, I'm not certain what else can be done besides monitoring the situation so it doesn't flow over the border.
Fair enough ? - Reply to this comment
- Everyone just ignore darthcheney345. Obviously he is a Rushbot and his only purpose here is to antagonize anyone who holds a different opinion than his own.
- Reply to this comment
- Michoacan is the most beautiful state in Mexico. It also happens to be the home state of both el presidente and la familia. President Calderon has deployed a large contingent of federal troops to fight the cartel and the federales are winning. There have been very few civilian casualties in this war in Michoacan.
The average Mexican citizen is sick of the war and the bloodshed, but life goes on very normally. If the average citizen is neutral, there is virtually no chance of getting caught in the crossfire. With all the federal troops in Michoacan - it is probably the safest place to visit or live in North America. The incidence of regular crime has dropped significantly. Even la familia has a stake in crime prevention. They go have drug dealers who sell the really dangerous and adulterated products. - Reply to this comment
- The Cartels are on the Run. they are desperate.
Mexicos military has captured so many Narcos, they are building 2 high security Prisons to house them,
there are new laws being considered at the national level
the main one being the Death Penalty for Organised crime.
the second one being the Legalising of smalll amounts of drugs for personal use, this will free up jail for the most violent Narcos.
Fopr those of you neonumnuts Blaming Obama
Calderon's war has been going on since he took office from Fox.
What did SHRUB do then? SHRUG and pat people on the back?
I Firmly believe that Mexico should legalise all drugs and
make the Narco into respectable business people.
that will speed up the pipline to the north, where the U.S. Crackhead is is the main sponsor of this Bloodshed. - Reply to this comment
- Ooops, that would be drug element, not drug elementary...bad edit..
- Reply to this comment
- Soooooooooooo, let's watch Obama and Hillary RUSH down to Mexico and apologize to the Mexican government who doesn't have the guts and fortitude to take the drug elementary out of their country, and who's getting murdered off with their own guns and ammunition stolen or sold off by the Mexican military to the drug cartels...
If Hillary and Obama pull such NONSENSE KRAP AGAIN, they need to flushed down the toilet in which they're already TWIRLING.... - Reply to this comment
- Well, right now Obama is in Africa apologizing and negotiating to outsource all our remaining jobs there.
Hillary - we haven't heard much from her lately, have we. Or Pelosi or Barney Frank, ever since Pelosi left on her trip to China.
Yah, they all disgrace themselves, so they're keeping a "low profile" so they don't drag down the whole party. But Pelosi/Obama's $50 billion GM debacle has more than made up for it, so it was a futile effort.
Nope, it's not long now before some major catastrophe happens, of 9/11 proportions. Remember how they said Bush was to blame for 9/11 because it was on "his watch?" But if something similar happens this September, don't you know they'll blame it on Bush again because he somehow "started it???"
Democrats are the part of NO responsibility. They still haven't held Ted Kennedy accountable for the death of Mary Jo, even though he pled guilty to leaving the scene of an accident that resulted in the death of his passenger.
So why would we expect them to take responsibility for anything else? - Reply to this comment
- decrease in demand and the overridding economic downturn as being particulary hard on the drugs merchants when both demand and currency values have diminished as severely as they have
-------------------------------
So, what you're saying is, Obama wrecking the economy is a GOOD thing because now the druggies don't have enough money to buy drugs anymore and now the "drug merchants" are becoming increasingly violent and dangerous as they lose their income?
Apparently you forgot that PEOPLE HERE IN THE USA have already been attacked by "drug merchants" who crossed the border freely and waged their gangland wars on U.S. territory. Children have been kidnapped, others have been beheaded.
But all you do is PRAISE YOUR MESSIAH the almighty Obama, because you think this is a GOOD thing...
Spoken like a true Obamabot. - Reply to this comment
- Close - it turned out eclecticman1 blamed it on the NRA and "our lax gun laws." See his post below.
ROTFLMAO! Libs are getting sooooo predictable! - Reply to this comment
- No it's the fault of Obama's failed policies and his weakness.
Will he be big enough to admit that?
It seems like more than a coincidence that all these things just SUDDENLY start happening in the first six months since Obama took office.
Also, check the price of gasoline - more than $1 HIGHER than it was on Jan 20.
Check the stock market - it's LOWER than it opened on Jan 20.
Check unemployment - it's HIGHER than it was on Jan 20.
Check the national debt - it's over $1 TRILLION HIGHER than it was on Jan 20.
And Obama is still continuing the failed policies of the Bush admin, like FREE TRADE, GITMO DETAINEES, WIRETAPS, and DRONES that kill civilians.
Will Obama be "big enough" to admit that he's a TOTAL FAILURE and a CLUELESS INCOMPETENT???? - Reply to this comment
- We've elected a President. We haven't elected an all magical being.
--------------
And yet, for the past 8 years every burned out lightbulb was a "failure of presidential leadership."
Remember when John Kerry ran his entire presidential campaign on that mantra? Failure of presidential leadership, failure of presidential leadership....
Sorry libs, but all these things happened ON OBAMA'S WATCH.
OBAMA IS TO BLAME.
It's that simple. - Reply to this comment
- by pete_in_az July 11, 2009 10:08 PM PDT
bush had 20 months to get his bearings and take command, but he let 9/11 happen instead.
------------
Liberals can't do math.
9/11/2001 was just under EIGHT months after Bush took office on Jan 20, 2001.
Maybe you should study more... - Reply to this comment
- the Somali pirates have been operating along the African coast for decades. Some checking would reveal whether or not they've ever 'grabbed' any other U.S. captains.
---------------
But apparently you're too lazy to do this checking yourself.
Let me give you the answer: NO U.S. CAPTAIN WAS EVER TAKEN HOSTAGE BY SOMALI PIRATES on Bush's watch, or EVER before Obama became president.
As for the rest of your blah, blah, blah - yah right, it's just COINCIDENCE that all these things just HAPPENED to occur while Obama was president. LOL!
Sounds like you're the one drinking kool-aid. ROTFLMAO! - Reply to this comment
- We are in danger in having a failed state on our borders. If Mexico collapses,Americans who buy Mexican drugs and our lax gun laws will have been responsible for the mess. Will we be big enough to admit it?
- Reply to this comment
-
- No it's the fault of Obama's failed policies and his weakness.
Will he be big enough to admit that?
It seems like more than a coincidence that all these things just SUDDENLY start happening in the first six months since Obama took office.
Also, check the price of gasoline - more than $1 HIGHER than it was on Jan 20.
Check the stock market - it's LOWER than it opened on Jan 20.
Check unemployment - it's HIGHER than it was on Jan 20.
Check the national debt - it's over $1 TRILLION HIGHER than it was on Jan 20.
And Obama is still continuing the failed policies of the Bush admin, like FREE TRADE, GITMO DETAINEES, WIRETAPS, and DRONES that kill civilians.
Will Obama be "big enough" to admit that he's a TOTAL FAILURE and a CLUELESS INCOMPETENT????
- No it's the fault of Obama's failed policies and his weakness.
