Comments on: Gunmen Attack Federal Forces in Mexico
Five Federal Agents, 2 Soldiers Killed in Bold, Coordinated Assault in Suspected Retaliation for Cartel Arrest
- So then they are just suppose to keep them locked up forever? No trial?
-------------
I covered that already. We can release them all in your neighborhood, if that's what you'd prefer.
It's your choice. - Reply to this comment
- LOL! You're so biased, you can't even see how biased you are.
- Reply to this comment
- by darthcheney345 July 12, 2009 3:18 PM PDT
When you cut miles and miles of slack for Obama and say 6 months of total disaster isn't enough to conclude that he's a bad president, but you want to blame Bush endlessly - yah, that makes you a liberal.
In this 6 months, I don't consider everything he has done a total disaster. That doesn't necessarily make me a liberal. It has nothing to do with whether he is a Democrat or not. I'm judging by what I am seeing right now. You consider EVERYTHING that he has done to be wrong. I have already told you that I didn't agree with him giving the car dealers bailout money. I figured that they shouldn't be getting any money until they had their problems fixed. If the problems aren't fixed, then it's a big mistake to give them money. There are things I agree with and things I don't, but overall I think it's too early to judge.
And I have NOT blamed Bush endlessly. Bush has done some good things, but it seems to be a lot more bad. I'm not blaming him because he is a "Republican". That is what all you AMERICANS do. Not me. You hate the other because they are "liberals" or "conservatives", not so much on what they have done or not done. It's just an automatic HATRED for one or the other.
Bush had 8 years in there, and everyone can see the mistakes he made. Obama has only had 6 months. Maybe he will learn from those mistakes, and turn things around. I'm not saying that because he's a LIBERAL, but because he's smart, and hopefully can figure it out. - Reply to this comment
- by darthcheney345 July 12, 2009 3:16 PM PDT
I'm not talking about releasing them without a trial first. Haven't they been held without trials?
---------------
How long do you think it will take a bunch of government lawyers to prepare for that many trials?
And I'm using Reply to this comment just to annoy you.
Is it working? :-)
So then they are just suppose to keep them locked up forever? No trial?
And YES, you are annoying me. But what's new? : ) - Reply to this comment
- When you cut miles and miles of slack for Obama and say 6 months of total disaster isn't enough to conclude that he's a bad president, but you want to blame Bush endlessly - yah, that makes you a liberal.
- Reply to this comment
- by erasmus111 July 12, 2009 2:50 PM PDT
by gravyboat4000 July 12, 2009 2:31 PM PDT
Spaniards and Mexicans. He's think you speak Spanish.
;-)
But I can. Me amas todavia? Hahahahaha!
Oops, I think maybe I made a mistake. : ) - Reply to this comment
- I'm not talking about releasing them without a trial first. Haven't they been held without trials?
---------------
How long do you think it will take a bunch of government lawyers to prepare for that many trials?
And I'm using Reply to this comment just to annoy you.
Is it working? :-) - Reply to this comment
- I don't think 6 months is long enough to judge him.
-----------------
LOL! What a liberal.
The liberals gave Bush only 3 months before they started judging him.
Now you say 6 months isn't long enough for a Democrat.
Sorry, but I live here. Obama's first 6 months has hurt us badly. We can't take another three and a half years of this.
He's done enough wrong in 6 months to prove that he's a clueless incompetent weakling.
Our enemies sure have made up their minds. - Reply to this comment
- by darthcheney345 July 12, 2009 2:47 PM PDT
You're the one who declared that your views differ from liberal views.
So you must know what liberal views are. Otherwise, how could you make that statement?
If you know what liberal views are, please tell us. And explain how yours are different.
What I see is, your views are:
Democrats good
Republicans bad
That sounds liberal to me.
I don't think you could see anything. I only know what is considered to be liberal, when I say something and someone calls me a liberal. Otherwise I don't know what all is considered to be liberal. And the same for conservative. I know that I am against guns, and so therefore I must be a liberal. Which of course doesn't make sense to me, because surely there must be liberals that do like guns. And there must be conservatives that don't like guns. I was for Bush going into Iraq to get rid of Saddam the butcherer, so that must mean I'm a republican. To me it wasn't about the "oil" or the "wmds". It was about stopping the butcherer.
I do not know how you can label someone. It's like there is this list or something. If you are liberal, then you must think this, and this, and this....???? How can it be that cut and dried? Or whatever that saying is. : ) - Reply to this comment
- by darthcheney345 July 12, 2009 2:43 PM PDT
That was exactly my point. Obama is as bad as Bush.
Gitmo? If Obama wanted to close it, you'd think a Harvard law professor could get it right.
Why not just release all the detainees in your neighborhood with no further trials. Would that make you happy?
I'm not talking about releasing them without a trial first. Haven't they been held without trials? - Reply to this comment



