Comments on: Gunmen Attack Federal Forces in Mexico
Five Federal Agents, 2 Soldiers Killed in Bold, Coordinated Assault in Suspected Retaliation for Cartel Arrest
Add a Comment See all 94 Comments
- "IF you does it".
That should be "IF HE does it". - Reply to this comment
- by darthcheney345 July 12, 2009 4:19 PM PDT
Neener, neener!
Boogle boogle!
: P - Reply to this comment
- by darthcheney345 July 12, 2009 4:18 PM PDT
But he really is making Bush look good. We're exactly where we were when Bush was president.
You're sure full of it today. There's a BIG difference. Most countries hated Bush. As of right now, most like Obama.
"Now, you would think Obama would get the idea to accelerate the rate of trials. After all, he's a Harvard law professor, you'd think he knows a thing or two about speeding up the legal process."
Oh yeah, that would go over good. If he speeded things up, then everyone would be jumping up and down saying he was doing something illegal. Like Bush, there's nothing he can do that would be right.
I can see why it's taking him so long to figure this one out. He was left this mess and he has to think long and hard about what is to be done with them.
And I think they would be better suited to YOUR good old state of TEXAS.
He's going to pull out the troops by the end of 2011. Isn't that good? Or don't you think so? And I don't want to hear, "IF you does it".
He's making progress in Afghanistan, isn't he? Or don't you think so? - Reply to this comment
- Now on the subject of health care, I was hoping that Obama would get it right, but I'm not so sure. I listened to him the other night and couldn't really understand what he was talking about. He said he didn't want to copy anyone else's health care. He wanted it to be "uniquely American". Ummmm, I didn't think that sounded very good. In fact I thought it was quite SCARY. Anything that is "uniquely American" is usually CORRUPT. : )
- Reply to this comment
- Neener, neener!
Boogle boogle! - Reply to this comment
- I WANT AN ANSWER!
--------------
What is hard to understand about this?
There are only two choices.
One: keep them locked up right where they are until they all get a fair and complete trial. Which will take decades at the current pace.
Two: release them without trial. I pick your neighborhood as the place to release them.
Now, you would think Obama would get the idea to accelerate the rate of trials. After all, he's a Harvard law professor, you'd think he knows a thing or two about speeding up the legal process.
But apparently he doesn't.
And moving them out of Gitmo was nixed by Congress. Nobody wants them in their neighborhood.
So, it's just another major unmitigated failure for Obama.
Once again, you'd think a Harvard law professor would be right on top of this. But after the spanking his own party administered to him in Congress, he back to Day 1 on the Gitmo issue.
You'd think he could do better than this.
But he really is making Bush look good. We're exactly where we were when Bush was president. - Reply to this comment
- by darthcheney345 July 12, 2009 3:57 PM PDT
LOL! You're so biased, you can't even see how biased you are.
Shut up, dinky head. - Reply to this comment
- by darthcheney345 July 12, 2009 3:58 PM PDT
So then they are just suppose to keep them locked up forever? No trial?
-------------
I covered that already. We can release them all in your neighborhood, if that's what you'd prefer.
It's your choice.
You did not answer my question!! What are they supposed to do with them?
I WANT AN ANSWER! - Reply to this comment
-
- I WANT AN ANSWER!
--------------
What is hard to understand about this?
There are only two choices.
One: keep them locked up right where they are until they all get a fair and complete trial. Which will take decades at the current pace.
Two: release them without trial. I pick your neighborhood as the place to release them.
Now, you would think Obama would get the idea to accelerate the rate of trials. After all, he's a Harvard law professor, you'd think he knows a thing or two about speeding up the legal process.
But apparently he doesn't.
And moving them out of Gitmo was nixed by Congress. Nobody wants them in their neighborhood.
So, it's just another major unmitigated failure for Obama.
Once again, you'd think a Harvard law professor would be right on top of this. But after the spanking his own party administered to him in Congress, he back to Day 1 on the Gitmo issue.
You'd think he could do better than this.
But he really is making Bush look good. We're exactly where we were when Bush was president.
- I WANT AN ANSWER!
- by darthcheney345 July 12, 2009 3:14 PM PDT
I don't think 6 months is long enough to judge him.
-----------------
LOL! What a liberal.
The liberals gave Bush only 3 months before they started judging him.
Now you say 6 months isn't long enough for a Democrat.
Sorry, but I live here. Obama's first 6 months has hurt us badly. We can't take another three and a half years of this.
He's done enough wrong in 6 months to prove that he's a clueless incompetent weakling.
Our enemies sure have made up their minds.
I wouldn't be too sure that your enemies have made up their minds. I'm on the outside looking in, and I will tell you things look a whole lot better than they did. Don't they say that people on the outside can see things better than the ones on the inside?
The pirates may have taken a hostage, but they didn't get away with it. And that whacko nutjob hasn't hit anyone with his missiles yet, has he? You gotta look on the bright side. Think positive. : ) In the beginning I thought that if Obama got in, it would be the biggest mistake. I too believed that he was weak. I said many times that he was a wimp, and McCain was a warmonger. But he's in there now, and you have to make the best of it. He's smart, he's surrounded himself with people that are more knowledgeable about things that he is lacking in. Hopefully he will get it right. I can guarantee that he's doing a far better job than that other idiot. And I don't mean Hillary. And no, it isn't because he's a conservative that I think he's an idiot. - Reply to this comment
- I'm still trying to figure out what this post is supposed to mean.
Sorry, it's just totally incoherent.
Would you like to try again? - Reply to this comment
Pesident Obama's
