Comments on: Intensified Crackdown Mutes Iran Protests

Demonstrators Overwhelmed By Police As Government Expels 2 British Diplomats, Refuses New Vote

[YrSoWrong]

Hey, man, I really want to know. She's a legend. The Soviet Union gave her a medal for pulling a train.

[YrSoWrong]

PVperson2, your mom won't take my calls. Have you been stealing my time with her? Sweet li'l Com.

[government_control]

How many more Iranians must die before Obama supports their human rights?

[government_control]

Obama has abandoned the people of Iran struggling for democracy. Obama will never support people fighting for democracy in terrorist regimes. Obama - The Great American Coward.

[PVperson2]

YrSoWrong, boy did you pick the right name, don't you get tired of people calling you an idiot?

[YrSoWrong]

Odd that Democrats are Communists without ballz, just a neutered old dog humping Lenin's leg. That 5-year plan would have worked if only it was given 500 years. Damn private property system. Yeah, sure. Here, poochie ...

[despido]

The demonstrations in Iran are a good thing.
Iran is a self-proclaimed enemy of the U.S. We will inevitably face Iran in a serious conflict if they continue on their present course - unless of course we surrender. Therefore we should take full advantage of any sign of a breakdown in their government, any weaknesses exposed. No need to foolishly set a single toe on their soil, as the idiot Bush did, but rather exploit the situation with the technology available. Civil unrest saps strength faster than a defensive war, which only strengthens resolve. Witness the anti-war movement during Viet Nam. Obama missed an opportunity and now looks pathetic as he admits to adjusting his rhetoric to appease critics at home. The regime in Iran is now stronger, they have brutalized their opponents, Ahmadinejad now has the entrenched support of the Supreme Leader and Obama looks impotent.

[YrSoWrong]

Odd that Democrats are Communists without ballz.

[PVperson2]

Odd that so many of you neo-cons are upset over the demonstrations in Iran, after all, when a couple of hundred thousand people demonstrated against the Iraq war in America, you all said it was inconsequential. Also, your the same people that have called for the bombing of Iran for years and now your all sappy over the same people. Neo-con nit-wits

[YrSoWrong]

Odd that Democrats are Communists without ballz.

[despido]

The demonstrations in Iran are a good thing.
Iran is a self-proclaimed enemy of the U.S. We will inevitably face Iran in a serious conflict if they continue on their present course - unless of course we surrender. Therefore we should take full advantage of any sign of a breakdown in their government, any weaknesses exposed. No need to foolishly set a single toe on their soil, as the idiot Bush did, but rather exploit the situation with the technology available. Civil unrest saps strength faster than a defensive war, which only strengthens resolve. Witness the anti-war movement during Viet Nam. Obama missed an opportunity and now looks pathetic as he admits to adjusting his rhetoric to appease critics at home. The regime in Iran is now stronger, they have brutalized their opponents, Ahmadinejad now has the entrenched support of the Supreme Leader and Obama looks impotent.

[joule18]

And when outraged Americans from both parties attended Tea Parties, you termed them inconsequential. The Tea Parties are about the excessive spending ,etc. which effects all of us. They were not demonstrations about Obama, but the policies and spending.

[despido]

If there is a lighter side to all of this, it is the fact that our President actually believes he can negotiate in good faith with these cretins.

[borg99]

Certainly no one can ever claim that religious dictatorships aren't as brutal and repressive as any other dictatorship (China, etc.).

Good thing we've got the First Amendment, which makes it less likely that U.S. religious fanatics can take over our country.

What makes some religious groups so dangerous is that they truly believe God is on their side, and their side only. So if you don't agree with them, you are defying God. The result -- an excuse for brutality.

[apple2pie]

too much mercury in your tuna tunaatlast.

[despido]

Ronald Reagan: "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall".

Barack Obama: "I don't want Mr. Ahmadinejad to not like me".

[thusspokezara]

News Alert. News Alert. This just in. The Supreme Leader of Iran rushed this evening to Tehran hospital after developing an uncontrollable fit of laughter while watching Obama's press conference. "I thought he was in status epilepticus," said an aide to the Ayatollah. "But no. He was just laughing his head off." The Supreme Leader is said to be resting comfortably at this time.

[speakinup22]

"America doesn't have to conquer the world, and I wish you'd stop suggesting we are obligated to do so. - HolyVoice

Ignorance is bliss ain't it holyone.

Uh, so did we keep Kiwait after kicking Saddam's butt ?


While we're on the "take over the world" for oil subject...

Why is the price of gasoline going up to over $3 a gallon ?

Oil is well below the $140 a barrel of when gas was pushed up to $4 a gallon.

Is Barry making sure his oil friends are getting rich ?

We all know it ain't Dubya now, or is that a carry over too ?

[speakinup22]

wyodutch - if they are lucky that is all that will happen.

Question. How many people do you think we have ever used waterboarding on ?

Clue - you have more fingers on one hand.

Psst - your thumb is not considered a finger in this case. (and, you would STILL have more fingers.)

[speakinup22]

Oh Please.... comparing the Ayatollah to the Supreme Court !

You ARE an ignorant person, aren't you.

No one gets on the Supreme Court unless they have been nominated by a President and voted upon by our ELECTED Senators. They may have political ideals that don't necessarily fit with each of our wishes, but they are eminently qualified in their own right, to be a judge.

The "Supreme Leader" (You gotta love that name - like Boris Badenough & Natasha in Bullwinkle) is elected by a goup of religious men (and only men) by the "Assembly of Experts".

Their criteria for electing a Supreme Leader is: "Islamic scholarship, justice, piety, right political and social perspicacity, prudence, courage, administrative facilities and adequate capability for leadership."[6] -wikipedia

In other words - follows sharia law.

"As all of their meetings and notes are strictly confidential, the Assembly has never been known to challenge any of the Supreme Leader's decisions." - wikipedia


THIS is why OUR forefathers decided that there should be a seperation between church and state. AND, it is what is MEANT by separation of church and state.

The church should NOT dictate who is the leader, otherwise this sort of junky government (Iran)is what you get.

So quit that analogy right now! That dog don't hunt.

[hungry1968-15]

by -----One-American----- June 23, 2009 12:31 PM PDT
Obama the dictator sits on his hands while the dream of freedom and democracy dies in Iran.






Yet just two months ago, you claimed that ALL Islamic were radicals and terrorists hell bent on destroying America.

What's the matter?

Did reality jump up and slap you in the face?

[speakinup22]

This all you have to say cs ?

So, how do you feel that Barry has reversed his decision to say nothing about the once obviously impending murders that came to fruition in Iran.

I mean, obviously he has decided he did the wrong thing and made a stronger statement as suggested by several "neocon fool"(s).

Up until yesterday, your ilk said he was doing it correctly.

No comments ?

Nah - I didn't think so.

So just who is the fool now ?

[apple2pie]

tunaatlast ... There is far too much mercury in the tuna you've been eating.