Comments on: India Warned Of Mumbai Attacks

CBS News: Intel Agency Said Two Weeks Ago That Pakistani Militants Might Target Indian Hotels

[leeanna58]

Bush was warned for 8 months about 9/11.

Posted by IwasHungry68

I''ve never heard that before. I''m not challenging your statement, but I would like to know your references so I can look it up myself. Where did you get that?

[pepperwood2]

That''s a good one! Nevel Chamberlain was warned that Hitler was going to attack England before Hitler signed the non aggression pac with Britian.

[mrmeatspin]

They did nothing because if the attack were to occur it would bolster justification to attack Iraq and the plan worked.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by fiteit1 at 11:10 AM : Dec 02, 2008
+ report abuse


**************
actually statements and declarations from the liberal masses indicated that even if we find osama bin laden himself..we already know that the liberal realm WILL FIGHT to make sure that he is treated well.

[mrmeatspin]

Bush was warned for 8 months about 9/11.

How much torture did that require?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by IwasHungry68 at 11:06 AM : Dec 02, 2008
+ report abuse


*******

bigger question..

how MUCH ACTION would you actually allow??? perhaps throw in harsh words or two??

even so much as a ''bad UnPC statement from bush'' you guys are in an uproar calling for impeachment.

you guys are the worst..you guys WOULD ACTUALLY hinder an effort to act on an intel..PLEASE DONT EVEN ARGUE THAT YOU WOuld not

[fiteit1]

Bush was warned in January 2001 of the threat of al Qaeda, and was repeatedly warned over the next 8 months.

In July 2001, George Tenet and Richard Clarke BOTH tried to warn Bush about the threat that al Qaeda might try to hijack airplanes, and use them as weapons against us.

The intelligence is only as good as the people that pay attention to it and act accordingly.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by IwasHungry68 at 08:24 AM

They did nothing because if the attack were to occur it would bolster justification to attack Iraq and the plan worked.

[mrmeatspin]

So India was warned about the attacks. You mean just like the bushnazis were warned about 9/11 and did absolutaly NOTHING to stop them?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by karlo59 at 10:37 AM : Dec 02, 2008
+ report abuse


**************

i love this..you do something..liberals bi tch
you DONT do something..liberals bi tch..

[mrmeatspin]

the problem with is intel...

LIBERALS ARE WEARY OF TERRORIST BEING TORTURED AND VIOLATED TO GET IT...


so if these happen again...we all know who allowed it to happen..

[karlo59]

So India was warned about the attacks. You mean just like the bushnazis were warned about 9/11 and did absolutaly NOTHING to stop them?

[mydiatribe]

This story substantiates a paradigm of the intelligence community. That is this: it isn''t intelligence until it is acted upon. These people mine as well not have known, since they chose to ignore it.

Evidently those processing the intelligence don''t possess any!!??

[excoachken]

C.Y.A. time in the terror protection community.

[Meg003]

While these attacks were horrifying and tragic, I keep thinking about the terrorists'' supposed goal of killing 5,000 people. The loss of life was devastating, but the Indian response seemed very aggressive and effective in preventing even more murders.