Comments on: Rice Urges "Transparency" In Pakistan

Secretary Of State Says America Expects Full Cooperation With Probe Into India Attack

Add a Comment See all 87 Comments
by firehose12 December 1, 2008 4:46 PM EST
Sending Rice to India is nothing short of pouring gasoline on the fire. She has no credibility anywhere except with the UK PM, our current lapdog.

Posted by lindh4 at 01:39 PM : Dec 01, 2008

Wrong Lib

Talk is always good. Obama Huessein may be popular, but really lets be clear here...the man has accomplished ZERO so far.

When he brings world peace - I applaud him.

Till then, nobody has credibilty over anyone else.
Reply to this comment
by firehose12 December 1, 2008 4:42 PM EST
Rice: All Victims Of Terror Must Be United

**

Including all of the non-civilian killing Muslims.
Reply to this comment
by papabc December 1, 2008 4:42 PM EST
Sending Rice to India is nothing short of pouring gasoline on the fire. She has no credibility anywhere except with the UK PM, our current lapdog.
Posted by lindh4
-----------------------------------------------------

I see you find it easier to blame the messanger.

why don''t you fly over and settle this for the world.
Reply to this comment
by intheshade-2009 December 1, 2008 4:40 PM EST
If the US would quit attacking Kashmir with their preditor missles, then they would be less likely to be attacked when they travel abroad.
Reply to this comment
by lindh4 December 1, 2008 4:39 PM EST
Sending Rice to India is nothing short of pouring gasoline on the fire. She has no credibility anywhere except with the UK PM, our current lapdog.
Reply to this comment
by darnedsocks December 1, 2008 4:36 PM EST
IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT ISLAM TEACHES, TYPE IN "EX MUSLIM" ON WWW.YOUTUBE.COM AND JUST LISTEN TO WHAT EX MUSLIMS HAVE TO SAY. ALSO, BE AWARE THAT THEY ARE RISKING THEIR LIVES TO WARN THE REST OF THE WORLD HOW DANGEROUS THE TEACHINGS OF ISLAM ARE. (IN ISLAM, APOSTACY IS REWARDED BY DEATH...GO FIGURE. ANOTHER HORRIBLE, SINFUL TEACHING ESPOUSED BY THIS BELIEF SYSTEM, I.E., THAT PEOPLE ARE "FORCED" TO GIVE THEMSELVES TO ISLAM, INSTEAD OF ALLOWING PEOPLE TO CHOOSE TO BELIEVE OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL.)
Reply to this comment
by papabc December 1, 2008 4:33 PM EST
Is easier for Liberals to attack Bush and crew than to look at Islamic Terrorist for what they are.

Terrorist would just a soon seen both liberals and conservatives kneel to Meca or cut of heads of non-believers.

Reply to this comment
by darnedsocks December 1, 2008 4:30 PM EST
SOONER OR LATER THE WORLD IS GOING TO HAVE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT "ISLAM" SPECIFICALLY TEACHES, ESPOUSES, AND ENCOURAGES ACTS OF VIOLENCE (IN SPITE OF WHAT MUSLIMS IN PAKISTAN ARE SAYING), ISLAM IS ORGANIZED, PER SHARIA LAW, TO "CONTROL" OTHERS THROUGH BARBARIC ACTS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF TERRORIZING.

WHEN IS THE WORLD GOING TO RECOGNIZE THAT ISLAM DOES NOT TEACH "FORGIVE AND FORGET" AND MOVE ON WITH LIFE. IT TEACHES REVENGE, HOLDING GRUDGES UNTIL THE END OF TIME, AND ALLOWS ACTS OF CRIMINALITY AGAINST ALL THOSE WHO ARE NOT "MUSLIM."

WHEN ARE MUSLIMS GOING TO "WAKE UP" AND ESCAPE FROM THE "GREAT DARKNESS" OF THIS HORRIBLE BELIEF SYSTEM? WHEN WILL THE WORLD WAKE UP AND CONDEMN THIS BARBARIC BELIEF SYSTEM?

WHEN WILL THE WORLD RECOGNIZE THAT THE TEACHINGS OF ISLAMIC (SHARIA) LAW ARE NOT "GODLY" BUT ABOUT MAN''S DESIRE TO CONTROL OTHERS THROUGH TERROR?
Reply to this comment
by fredflinsto2 December 1, 2008 4:19 PM EST
fredflinsto2 you forget she was National Securty advisor before Sec of state after powell.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by impeach___

Well, that would help explain how we got attacked on 9/11
Reply to this comment
by lovegetpeace December 1, 2008 4:18 PM EST
Posted by jamesm12341 at 01:07 PM : Dec 01, 2008

What is your definition of Successful in Life? ...because I feel sorry for their terrible Legacy casted on stone forever. Shall we include your name along with all the other NeoCons on that stone?
Reply to this comment
by lovegetpeace December 1, 2008 4:14 PM EST
Posted by jamesm12341 at 01:07 PM : Dec 01, 2008

What is your definition of Successful? ...because I feel sorry for their terrible Legacy cast on stone forever.
Reply to this comment
by impeach___w December 1, 2008 4:06 PM EST
The biggest and only mistake that Idiot Republican President Bush did was to select his Idol D. Cheney as his V.P.
Posted by lovegetpeace

Which president Bush? I submit, That thier biggest blunders were that they did not "pull out" in time. Bush senior''s biggest error was nine months before Jr. was born.
Reply to this comment
by lovegetpeace December 1, 2008 4:02 PM EST
The biggest and only mistake that Idiot Republican President Bush did was to select his Idol D. Cheney as his V.P.
Reply to this comment
by lovegetpeace December 1, 2008 4:01 PM EST
The Republican Party needed Fear Policies to keep them in power. Having Osama Bin Ladin and all other terrorist organizations alive is good for the Republicans because it keeps the Fear alive.

What the Republicans mis-calculated was the Meltdown of the Economy due to Toxic Economic policies which would shadow Fear in Americans.

Thank you very much Republican President Bush for been such a perfect Idiot.
Reply to this comment
by impeach___w December 1, 2008 3:54 PM EST
Posted by fredflinsto2 ...when Powell showed he had integtity...

They both approved the torture and harsh techniques. People like this have no integrity, they are criminals according to the laws in this country.
Reply to this comment
by jgunther7 December 1, 2008 3:50 PM EST
The incident in Mumbia has little to do with international terrorism and more to do with Kashmir wanting to break away from India, or to become part of Pakistan. US, Israeli and British were targeted because of their meddling. This is just unfinished business from when Britain divided India and Pakistan. The US was originally arming Kashmir when they were building Al-Quaeda to fight the Russians and then withdrew support when they started fighting Al-Quaeda. It is time for the US to quite meddling and for Condo Rice to go home.
Reply to this comment
by impeach___w December 1, 2008 3:48 PM EST
fredflinsto2 you forget she was National Securty advisor before Sec of state after powell.
Reply to this comment
by fredflinsto2 December 1, 2008 3:40 PM EST
fredflinsto2, Rice was in before Bush, She "interviewed" him before he even was a candidate for nomination.


----------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------

Posted by impeach

No, shew replaced Powell when Powell left the Bush administration

Rice replaced Powell when Powell showed he had integtity and having integrity was unacceptable to Bush, so Powell had to leave. that is how Rice became part of the most corrupt adminstration this country has had to date
Reply to this comment
by fredflinsto2 December 1, 2008 3:37 PM EST
fredflinsto2, Rice was in before Bush, She "interviewed" him before he even was a candidate for nomination.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by impeach

No, shew replaced Powell when Powell left the Bush administration
Reply to this comment
by impeach___w December 1, 2008 3:34 PM EST
fredflinsto2, Rice was in before Bush, She "interviewed" him before he even was a candidate for nomination.
Reply to this comment
See all 87 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: