Comments on: Rice Urges "Transparency" In Pakistan
Secretary Of State Says America Expects Full Cooperation With Probe Into India Attack
- immature idealistic *** Posted by brianwwb
I think you meant just a God #$%^& piece of paper!
and you are my enemy - Reply to this comment
- It''s pretty obvious you hate the President of The United States and are actively attacking him with immature idealistic *** that has been already discard as nonsense.
The enemies of the United States love you.
Posted by brianwwb
you nailed it again! I hate all enemies of freedom and our constitution, all the terrorists and Especially Bush/Cheney. Every group or nation this country has openly or secretly supported has come back to us with our weapons as our enemy. - Reply to this comment
- notblue
These are not "my" dems. Most lifelong politicians like these are as incompetant as bush is for taking impeachment off the table. It''s the only recourse removing for a sitting president and was considered a free pass to him. Cheney would also need impeachment First or he would just take over. There is no time for impeachment now and BTW, I have had a variation of this name for years.
I am a Republican and as such I was able to vote against twice as much as anyone outside of Texas. - Reply to this comment
- Useful idiot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In political jargon, the term "useful idiot" was used to describe Soviet sympathizers in western countries and the alleged attitude of the Soviet government towards them. The implication was that though the person in question naovely thought themselves an ally of the Soviets or other Communists, they were actually held in contempt by them, and being cynically used.
You call me an idiot and a terrorist (someone added foreginer too) and cannot hold an adult conversation with text, and I am immature. - Reply to this comment
- impeach_w, not only were no laws broken but your dems didn''t even bring impeachment to the table, even in a symbolic manner, what part of that reality do you not understand? What''s it like living in an imaginary world of hate?
- Reply to this comment
- NO LAWS weere found to be broken, and since all the Dems have done for the last eight years is investigate their political rivals I think it is safe to say there will be no impeachment proceedings. If you didn''''t know, the election is over now and you people can join the world of reality.
posted by notblue
First I was born here not saudi like you seem to have been. No laws were found to be broken because bushs minion puppets Ashcroft, gonzo and mukasey did the "deciding". Lets hope the new AG has some grown man ''nads and sticks them with some charges. - Reply to this comment
- Does this sound like the Bush Haters?
Posted by brianwwb
sounds like a McCarthy disciple-yikes!
I under- estimated him as just an another rabid Bush supporter. - Reply to this comment
- impeach w, unlike the country you come from America is a democracy and one man cannot do what you people claim. There were countless investigations inot prewar intelligence among other issues performed by the Democrats. NO LAWS weere found to be broken, and since all the Dems have done for the last eight years is investigate their political rivals I think it is safe to say there will be no impeachment proceedings. If you didn''t know, the election is over now and you people can join the world of reality.
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by brianwwb
tortue...debunked
wiretapping...debunked
kidnapping...debunked
holding americans without trial...debunked
Basically anything that does not protect the constituion he swore to protect...debunked
any high crime like treason...laughable
war crimes...debunked
over stepping his authority...debunked
plus any misdemeaners you know about...laughable
If what you are saying is true then almost every President ever elected should have been impeached.
Funny I though you were deranged because nothing you mentioned has been debunked or disproven- quite the opposite, yet no charges have been filed.
until I read this:
"If what you are saying is true then almost every President ever elected should have been impeached"
Posted by brianwwb
YOU FINALLY GOT IT!!! - Reply to this comment
- Miketotten1, why not just head back into the cave and hide with the rest of your brothers, clear thinking adults understand your propoghanda and rhetoric are just that and have no basis in fact.
- Reply to this comment
- The only humans not united by terror are the Islamic radicals and the leftwing of America, they still think it''''s a government perpetrated conspiracy!
posted by notblue
See the article and you will see that the direct link between is between the Right and the MEK group which is on the state dept. list of known terrorist groups. This is a direct link beteween Cheney, the CIA, Bush And The M.E.K. in Iran! - Reply to this comment
- The leftwingers that frequent these post are going to be dissapointed when Obama stays the course. He realized he needed to pander to the leftwing screamers of America and spew the crapp they wanted to hear to get elected, now common sense and reality can once again prevail. The election is over and all those one line, idiotic, simplistic political Move.on talking points can go to where they belong, the trash!
- Reply to this comment
- Continued...
According to all three intelligence sources, military and intelligence officials alike were alarmed that instead of securing a known terrorist organization, which has been responsible for acts of terror against Iranian targets and individuals all over the world %u2013 Rumsfeld under instructions from Cheney, began using the group on special ops missions into Iran to pave the way for a potential Iran strike.
%u201CThey are doing whatever they want, no oversight at all,%u201D one intelligence source said.
The below is one example of a policy to support terrorists for use as proxy groups:
"Bomb blasts struck Iranian government buildings in the capital of an oil-rich border province, followed within hours by two other bombs in central Tehran, killing nine people, days before presidential elections."
It%u2019s believed that the attacks by MEK had been halted in March of last year. If this attack is shown to be tied to MEK terrorists or any other "group" we are funding, arming, and training in the region, then the US will be implicated - even if we had nothing to do with the bombing directly. - Reply to this comment
- The only humans not united by terror are the Islamic radicals and the leftwing of America, they still think it''s a government perpetrated conspiracy! LOL!
- Reply to this comment
- BUSH SUPPORTS A KNOWN TERRORIST GROUP IN IRAN THE M.E.K.- YOU CAN IMPEACH FOR THAT RIGHT?
The Pentagon is bypassing official US intelligence channels and turning to a dangerous and unruly cast of characters in order to create strife in Iran in preparation for any possible attack, former and current intelligence officials say.
One of the operational assets being used by the Defense Department is a right-wing terrorist organization known as Mujahedeen-e Khalq (MEK), which is being %u201Crun%u201D in two southern regional areas of Iran. They are Baluchistan, a Sunni stronghold, and Khuzestan, a Shia region where a series of recent attacks has left many dead and hundreds injured in the last three months.
One former counterintelligence official, who wished to remain anonymous due to the sensitivity of the information, describes the Pentagon as pushing MEK shortly after the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The drive to use the insurgent group was said to have been advanced by the Pentagon under the influence of the Vice President%u2019s office and opposed by the State Department, National Security Council and then-National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice. - Reply to this comment
- ...admitted to being a member of Lashkar-e-Taiba, a militant group once supported by Pakistan''''s military intelligence service (ISI). ISI were supported by the US and the CIA. You see where this is going?
Just blame support from Iran and let''''s get this over with once and for all. All we need is the thinnest link we can find between this group and Iran. Just keep beating on this guy until he says whatever you want him to... - Reply to this comment
- Incidently, let''''s hear your laughable incompetent claims for impeachment.
Posted by brianwwb
why bother? Bush is out of time and you probably have them memorized better than I do and would ignore when I answered as you have ALL day.
here''s a start:
tortue, wiretapping, kidnapping , holding americans without trial. Basically anything that does not protect the constituion he swore to protect, any high crime like treason, war crimes, or over stepping his authority, plus any misdemeaners you know about... - Reply to this comment
- Posted by mahalapril at 04:58 PM : Dec 01, 2008
2nd Guessing AFter the facts is so easy and cheap that even my 6 years old son can do it.
Using your God given intelligence, going forward, what is the best course of action? - Reply to this comment
- START COUNTING FOR THE RESUMPTION OF THE ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS SINCE 9/11. OBAMA AND DEMOCRATS WILL FOCUS ON THE WELFARE ECONOMY. BUSH PROTECTED US SINCE 9/11 WHICH CLINTON COULD HAVE PREVENTED AND AND SAVED THE LIVES OF 3,000 INNOCENT CIVILIANS.DURING CLINTON''S SECOND TERM SUDAN TRIED TO GIVE UP BIN LADIN BUT CLINTON REFUSED.IN 1998 WHEN 2 US EMBASSIES IN AFRICA WERE BOMBED BY AL-QAEDA IN AFRICA ,CLINTON INSTEAD OF INVADING AFGHANISTAN JUST LAUNCHED SYMBOLIC MISSILE STRIKES ON A BUILDING IN SUDAN OWNED BY BIN LADIN AND ON THE TRAINIG CAMP OF AL-QAEDA IN AFGHANISTAN.
- Reply to this comment
- The biggest and only mistake that President Bush did...
Which president Bush? I submit, That thier biggest blunders were that they did not "pull out" in time. Bush senior''s biggest error was nine months before Jr. was born. Posted by impeach___w
both are more successful in life than you are.....what does that say about you?
Posted by jamesm12341
james12341, Define success
Successful how with Daddy''s money, the Saudis''s money? Getting into Yale or all that gaye skull and bones stuff? Was it all of the successful businesses he ran into the ground, his world series baseball team or brilliant military career. His leadership, hanldling of 9/11, intellect, vocbulary, economic and other judgement? Was it all that Cocaine and booze, the DUI or his hook''em horns cheerleading? How exactly are you measuring sucess?
I am quite happy with my success compared to W Bush''s and I also have a higher approval rating! - Reply to this comment



