Comments on: Pirates Hijack Oil Tanker In Brazen Attack

Seizure Off The Kenyan Coast Is Furthest Out To Sea And On Biggest Vessel Yet

Add a Comment See all 77 Comments
by questionnews November 17, 2008 5:25 PM EST
I see the politically obsessed still have their election vitriol locked on the wacko setting.
Reply to this comment
by engymass2 November 17, 2008 5:11 PM EST
Why are soo many on this post making references to liberals ?? You better watch what you say.... least President Obama send the US Military to YOUR doorstep !!
Reply to this comment
by xalen54 November 17, 2008 4:46 PM EST
Maybe this is just a sign that it is time we should nuke Somailia....
Reply to this comment
by gop_will_win November 17, 2008 4:41 PM EST
What is with these liberal pirates stealing ships at sea? Arent their welfare checks enough?
Reply to this comment
by claydowner November 17, 2008 4:09 PM EST
The US Navy needs small Corvettes like the Swedish Visby class at about 1,400 tons or a slightly larger version of a Coast Guard cutter. These type of ships need are ideal for these asymmetrical threats posed by pirates. The 19th century British Royal navy kept many of these small corvettes permanently stationed along their shipping lanes around the world. They were ideal for working with local officials and became the face of the British Empire for millions of people. America should do the same thing today in the 21st century that the British did in the 19th century.


The military industrial complex is focused on huge weapons programs based on Cold War era concepts of conventional warfare. These huge weapons programs have an anal fixation for spending many billions of dollars on nuclear aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines, fighter plane programs like the F-18 Super Hornet, F-22 fighter plane (that costs $200 billion per plane), the B-2 bomber, missile defense in Alaska, and many others for all the services. If WW III happens we are in great shape. What value are these weapon systems against guerrillas, terrorists, or pirates for small limited wars or a terrorist with a suit case nuke?
Reply to this comment
by sincity_q November 17, 2008 4:01 PM EST
The affected waters are really a bit too vast to patrol with the limted international effort thus far put forward. But what could be done far easier would be to assign warships to block access to the major Somali ports where the pirates take their victims/ships. In essense, an internation blackade of Somali ports to suffocate the pirates... keeping them on dry gound and preventing them from having a place to go with hijacked vessels.
Reply to this comment
by earache4 November 17, 2008 3:42 PM EST
NOW Haliburton will get involved....
Reply to this comment
by secundus2 November 17, 2008 3:39 PM EST
Instead of patrolling millions of sq. miles, perhaps some warships should be assigned to convoy commercial vessels formed into groups.

Also, an occasional decoy that turned against the attackers wouldn''t be amiss.
Reply to this comment
by demdump November 17, 2008 3:25 PM EST
Bait the pirate and blow each one on them when they come near....
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 November 17, 2008 2:50 PM EST
Guess who''s going to be asked to protect these Saudi tankers with their navy?
Reply to this comment
by questionnews November 17, 2008 2:39 PM EST
Would someone please explain to me how a bouch of rag tag thugs in an open 18 foot boat with an out board engine can pull over an oil super tanker. I don''''t get it.

Posted by Flipper137 at 11:19 AM : Nov 17, 2008

They thrown grappling hooks over the edge of the ship & climb up with their weapons. Since weapons are banned on almost all ships (especially fuel ships), there''s little the crew can do.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey November 17, 2008 2:37 PM EST
["It''s not easy to take over a ship" as massive as oil tankers, which typically have armed guards on board, he said. ]

may i suggest raising the ladder on the side of the ship once it''s out to sea. there are also highly directional audio systems used on cruise ships to defend against undesirable approaches.

another strategy would be a modified form of the phalanx ciws anti missile system used on most american warships. a few of these on every major ship would put an end to the pirate business being an attractive option.
Reply to this comment
by flipper137 November 17, 2008 2:19 PM EST
Would someone please explain to me how a bouch of rag tag thugs in an open 18 foot boat with an out board engine can pull over an oil super tanker. I don''t get it.
Reply to this comment
by questionnews November 17, 2008 2:09 PM EST
Nuke the ba$tards.


Posted by nikosk11 at 11:07 AM : Nov 17, 2008


Independence Day??
Reply to this comment
by nikosk11 November 17, 2008 2:07 PM EST
Nuke the ba$tards.

Reply to this comment
by questionnews November 17, 2008 1:43 PM EST
They could do what the Chinese do to pirates.
10 minute trial & 5 minutes to put a bullet in the back of their heads. Yea, they''re not much for sorting out the details, but those even thinking about that line of work quickly start thinking about a different career.
Reply to this comment
by kk217 November 17, 2008 12:59 PM EST
I know there has to be some international law prohibiting commercial vessels from arming themselves but this is ridiculous!!!
Reply to this comment
See all 77 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lobbyists Pushed Off U.S. Advisory Panels

    (206 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: