Comments on: Officials: Pakistan Fires On U.S. Copters
U.S. Denies Incursion By Helicopters; Afghans Want Joint Military Force At Pakistan Border
- onemoretim, "We need to recall the troops, the terrorists are in Washington...."
---------
Ya,and Wall Street. Just so long as the terrorists don''t recall the troops..... and turn them on US!!! - Reply to this comment
- These decisions ARE being made by the commander-in-chief---you know, The Decider---the onus of guilt falls on his head!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by stn_sage at 06:46 PM : Sep 22, 2008
Allies are supposed to be fighting against the same thing you twit. The problem is that Islam sticks together no matter what country they are in and Pakistan wants to please everybody at the same time. They don''t want to lose U.S. aid coming into the country that no one is the U.S. has the balls to turn off the spikit of funds rolling into countries that don''t even like us. - Reply to this comment
- There is little or no evidence that this ''incident'' actually took place. Once apon a time CBS/AP used reporters in the field. Now they sit is a hotel and report rumors.
- Reply to this comment
- http://www.snopes.com/rumors/clinton.asp
- Reply to this comment
- Well, if the U.S. violates their airspace, I suppose we will be shot at, correct!? This makes sense!
If Bush wants to violate their sovereignty---and the law---he''s going to have to do it in a way he doesn''t get caught!
And, pardon me ladies and gentlemen, a point here!
Field commanders are NOT authorized to make these kind of decisions and are NOT in Afghanistan, either!
These decisions ARE being made by the commander-in-chief---you know, The Decider---the onus of guilt falls on his head! - Reply to this comment
- I suppose they will get mad when we shoot back.
- Reply to this comment
- All you anti-Clinton GOPigs here, just go to Snopes.com, type in Clinton, go to Clinton and terrorism and the truth behind all your lies will be revealed.
- Reply to this comment
Funny thing is, I can remember when crude was $25 a barrel....
Posted by onemoretim at 06:20 PM : Sep 22, 2008
The U.S. petroleum industry''s price has been heavily regulated through production or price controls throughout much of the twentieth century. In the post World War II era U.S. oil prices at the wellhead averaged $24.98 per barrel adjusted for inflation to 2007 dollars. In the absence of price controls the U.S. price would have tracked the world price averaging $27.00. Over the same post war period the median for the domestic and the adjusted world price of crude oil was $19.04 in 2007 prices. That means that only fifty percent of the time from 1947 to 2007 have oil prices exceeded $19.04 per barrel.
http://www.wtrg.com/prices.htm- Reply to this comment
- U.S. propaganda at its finest.
Posted by generey
What is? Please be specific.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by billarynfl at 06:09 PM : Sep 22, 2008
Everything "reported" by the gov''t. Like the WMD''s in Iraq for example. "Pakistan" is an important "ally". "Policing" the world is in the best interest of OUR national security. Specific enough? - Reply to this comment
- the world it fed up with all this "libs this" "rep''s that" B S.
If that is all you are able to yap on and on about, GET A LIFE. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




