Comments on: Report: Russia May Send Nukes To Cuba

Castro Commends New Leader's Silence On Report, Says Cuba Owes Washington No Explanations

Add a Comment See all 403 Comments
by newtagagain July 24, 2008 5:56 PM EDT
liberals is creating a society in which the people are dependent on the state on how to act, how to drive, how to conduct itself on the net, how to do this and how to do that...its that lack of responsibility thing

Posted by libsluv2spit

"liberals is ....?" Of course the only thing that GOPigs are intent on regulating is what goes on in your bedroom. Personally I''d rather have a few banks under the government thumb than my ssexx life.
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit July 24, 2008 5:55 PM EDT
To all you dipsheit neocons out there, remember it was a democrat who stared the Russians down last time they tried this. Also, how can we expect to threaten them with our missiles on their border without them answering? I mean I realise Bush is that dumb, but it surprises me that armed forces leaders are dumb as well.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by NewTagAgain at 02:52 PM : Jul 24, 2008
+ report abuse

***********

i dont think a liberal EVER had any faith on our military to begin with..may it be kennedy or may it be bush...spitting at american soldiers and burning flags is what defines a liberal.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislamt July 24, 2008 5:54 PM EDT
time to scrap the UN and NATO,,,

they are both worthless huge wastes of money,,,
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit July 24, 2008 5:53 PM EDT
libsluv2spit: your comment about Reagan is vapid. The idea that 7 years of Reagan broke Russia is a conservative wet dream.
Communism does not work over the long term.
75 years of Communism did more to destroy Communism than Ronald Reagan ever did.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by neoconslayer at 02:43 PM : Jul 24, 2008
+ report abuse


********************

please let me correct myself..a flawed communist ideology PLUS a heavy leaning Ronald Reagan CAUSED that down fall. we met whatever they had head on..may it be in afghanistan or homefront.
Reply to this comment
by newtagagain July 24, 2008 5:52 PM EDT
To all you dipsheit neocons out there, remember it was a democrat who stared the Russians down last time they tried this. Also, how can we expect to threaten them with our missiles on their border without them answering? I mean I realise Bush is that dumb, but it surprises me that armed forces leaders are dumb as well.
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit July 24, 2008 5:50 PM EDT
libsluv2spit: Castro survived Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush I and, of course, Bush II didn''''t do anything about it.
For you to claim that Castro is the result of two liberal presidents is the most pathetic thing i have ever seen posted on this site.
You should be ashamed of yourself.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by neoconslayer at 02:41 PM : Jul 24, 2008
+ report abuse


**********************
amazing how you skipped all those liberal presidents..but anyhow, cuba and russia were buddies during the kennedy era. Castro and Cuba DEFINED the kennedy persidency. Cuba was dealth with an economic sanction and became a docile little mutt. For Russia and Cuba to EVEN THINK of doing what they are planning on doing is a clear cut signal for a full-fledged Nuclear Standoff..AGAIN. (do you really want that would make your neighborhood glow at night sit inside a rouge nation a few hundred miles away??)

the 2nd liberal president is clinton with osama..

humm both were distracted by women..
Reply to this comment
by erasmus81 July 24, 2008 5:45 PM EDT
"My whole goal in terms of having tough, serious direct diplomacy is not because I''m naive about the nature of any of these regimes. I''m not," Obama said at a press conference. "It is because if we show ourselves willing to talk and to offer carrots and sticks in order to deal with these pressing problems..."

You think having Bush for president is bad? Wait till Obama gets in there. He is at the other end of the scale. Obama thinks offering "carrots and sticks" is going to solve all the problems.

Naive? Naaaaaah.

I think I would be praying for another candidate to suddenly appear before it''s too late. One that is more in the middle. I wouldn''t want Obama dealing with this kind of problem.
Reply to this comment
by neoconslayer July 24, 2008 5:43 PM EDT
libsluv2spit: your comment about Reagan is vapid. The idea that 7 years of Reagan broke Russia is a conservative wet dream.
Communism does not work over the long term.
75 years of Communism did more to destroy Communism than Ronald Reagan ever did.
Reply to this comment
by neoconslayer July 24, 2008 5:41 PM EDT
libsluv2spit: Castro survived Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush I and, of course, Bush II didn''t do anything about it.
For you to claim that Castro is the result of two liberal presidents is the most pathetic thing i have ever seen posted on this site.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
Reply to this comment
by neo267-2009 July 24, 2008 5:40 PM EDT
Time to get rid of Cuba once and for all.
Reply to this comment
by minuteman-4 July 24, 2008 5:40 PM EDT
OOPS SORRY RUSSIAN SHORT CIRCUITS EH.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by vietnam21 at 02:38 PM

what are you talking about ? none of those down bombers...what do you mean short circuits ?
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit July 24, 2008 5:40 PM EDT
Well, I guess it''''s time to scramble some F-22 raptors down to McDill AFB, FL to intercept any commie that gets stupid enough to fly into our airspace with a bomber......sorry, russia, the sidewinder missle went off accidentally


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Minuteman-4 at 02:36 PM : Jul 24, 2008
+ report abuse

************************

russia cannot sustain an arms race with this country. Ronald Reagan proved that..what they are doing is flexing thier muscle trying to hook up some liberal cowardice to use against this country.

if this is to be won, just do a death grip on where they get thier resources..middle east.

Reply to this comment
by terrorislams July 24, 2008 5:39 PM EDT
Posted by neoconslayer at 02:35 PM : Jul 24, 2008

ummmm shooting a pill factory and an empty field that you warned them in advance on,,,

is doing nothing nancy
Reply to this comment
by minuteman-4 July 24, 2008 5:39 PM EDT
rafterman1

Russia knows that we have Trident nuclear ballistic submarines off their coast, so they won''t get dumb.....they are just laughing at the weak candidate the Democraps nominated......"comrade.....this is too easy...look who stupid democrats nominate...junior senator....this will be too easy comrade...(laughing)"
Reply to this comment
by vietnam21 July 24, 2008 5:38 PM EDT
Well, I guess it''''s time to scramble some F-22 raptors down to McDill AFB, FL to intercept any commie that gets stupid enough to fly into our airspace with a bomber......sorry, russia, the sidewinder missle went off accidentally


Posted by Minuteman-4

DON''T FORGET B2,F117 UNMAN AND TOMAHAWS STEALTH, OOPS SORRY RUSSIAN SHORT CIRCUITS EH.
Reply to this comment
by neoconslayer July 24, 2008 5:38 PM EDT
Ah yes, THE MISSILE SHIELD.
IF YOU PUT A TRACKING DEVICE INSIDE A STRATEGIC MISSILE THAT IS CODED TO THE INTERCEPTING MISSILE, WE CAN HIT THAT MISSILE 4 OUT OF 5 TIMES.
If you have faith in the missile shield, please google dalcon shield.
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit July 24, 2008 5:37 PM EDT
"Liberals believe in the supremacy of the individual over the state."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by rafterman1 at 02:30 PM : Jul 24, 2008
+ report abuse

***************

I dont think liberals reign supreme on any at this rate of giving the state powers to interfere with our individual rights and ''do''s and dont''s".

liberals is creating a society in which the people are dependent on the state on how to act, how to drive, how to conduct itself on the net, how to do this and how to do that...its that lack of responsibility thing
Reply to this comment
by minuteman-4 July 24, 2008 5:36 PM EDT
Well, I guess it''s time to scramble some F-22 raptors down to McDill AFB, FL to intercept any commie that gets stupid enough to fly into our airspace with a bomber......sorry, russia, the sidewinder missle went off accidentally
Reply to this comment
by neoconslayer July 24, 2008 5:35 PM EDT
terrorislams: Under President Clinton, the US, on multiple occasions, launched attacks against suspected terrorist bases, etc.
You are a liar when you post that the US made no response other than ''talk'' during the entire Clinton administration.
Reply to this comment
by vietnam21 July 24, 2008 5:35 PM EDT
And suppose the Russians decide to send a few missiles back at us? Oh, that''''s right, I forgot, you''''re a conservative. Consequences of actions don''''t concern you.

Posted by rafterman1

DON''T FORGET WE HAVE MISSILES SHIELD EH...
Reply to this comment
See all 403 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: