Comments on: Report: Russia May Send Nukes To Cuba

Castro Commends New Leader's Silence On Report, Says Cuba Owes Washington No Explanations

[factsearcher]

In more recent news:
"Iran ends cooperation with UN nuclear arms probe" reuters

They are building nuclear arms..have no doubts.
The question remain: Now that Iran have flatly told UN that they will not cooperate and will continue developing....whats the UN EU US and Israel to do?
Dont say nothing...this lunatic cannot possess the weapons..and Russia is threatening us...because they are the ones financing together with China.
So, as you read Russia is thinking of sending nukes to Cuba in retaliation.... any takers?

[flajoe1]

face it people..cuba and castro was kennedy''''s blunder..
---

Posted by libsluv2spit at 05:53 PM

Don''t you mean Eisenhower''s blunder?

Check the timeline, Castro came to power under Eisenhower. Kennedy inherited Castro from Eisenhower

[libsluv2spit]

face it people..cuba and castro was kennedy''s blunder..he left a mess that he hope that time would sweep under the rug..JUST LIKE CLINTON WITH OSAMA..

its time to actually do action to correct this mistake or this will not end..

[jericho1337]

It`s funny (and a bit alarming) how quickly the US has forgotten Reagan and the Cold War. Remember when he spoke at the Berlin Wall?

As The National Review reports: "When [Reagan] went to the Berlin Wall before the Brandenburg Gate and spoke what has become the signature line of his presidency, entreating Mikhail Gorbachev to `tear down this wall,` it was greeted back home by the chattering class with rolled eyes and smirks. There he goes again."

Remember that? Remember how the US and Reagan were chided for their "cowboy mentality?" Why do we insist on making those same elitist mistakes?

I believe that history will look as kindly on the current Middle East situation as it does on Reagan and the Cold War. It doesn`t matter if you don`t believe this - just remember it and then in twenty years you can point it out to the current batch of apologists and buffoons.

[libsluv2spit]

Posted by talkingham at 05:35 PM : Jul 24, 2008
+ report abuse
Have you seen how a patriotic liberals have civil discussions about politics these days? Liberal civil discussions is pretty much limited to cartoons and arguments in some comedy central television show. The glue that held the Hippie movement of the 1960%u2019s was DRUG USE and that same drug induced mentality present during the Hippie Movement is pretty much alive now and has been redefined as liberalism. Millions of liberals fought and died for this country?? Millions you say?? I am sorry to say this but a lot of liberal sacrifice is pretty much bordered into simple %u2018whinning%u2019 and the lack of action. i.e. they don%u2019t like the war for oil BUT refuse to conserve..you need a bumper to put your %u2018no war for oil%u2019 bumper sticker?

Burning the American flag and SPITTING AT AMERICAN SOLDIERS is not a very good way of calling attention to the travesty of the Vietnam war, maybe you have not noticed but the Vietnam war is over loooong time ago but that same hippie slash liberal mentality lingers on%u2026.creating hinderance to a clear and present danger.

[talkingham]

It''s the lying labeling neocon republicans who insist on accusing every person who is against their view as unpatriotic who are doing their best to undermine civil discussions about politics or anything else and damaging this nation. Just because a few drugged out hippies may have spit on someone let''s go out define everyone who is a liberal as one of those hippies. Millions of people who describe themselves as political liberals have fought and died for this country but stupid jerks like you would rather desecrate their service than recognize them for the sacrifices they and I include myself have made. THIS LABELING TECHNIQUE IS THE SAME AS VERBALLY SPITTING IN MY FACE!

What have you done to serve this country- tell us about that, not what some hippie might have done in the lates ''60''s or ''70''s. I don''t even decry them for what they did. Someone had to draw this nation''s attention to the travesty of the Vietnam War because the sold-out politicians and defense contractors didn''t CARE any more back then they they do now.

[flajoe1]

Before George no nukes in North Korea. After George nukes in North Korea.

Before George no nukes in Cuba. After George ?????????? ........

He''s building a great the legacy.

[libsluv2spit]

The guy interviewed thousands of returning soldiers. The incidents were rare.

Besides, I was a Marine (like my dad), and there were no spitters (or spittees) in my family.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by rafterman1 at 03:06 PM : Jul 24, 2008
+ report abuse
************

and where did this interview occured?? not in liberal areas...may i remind you the liberal media had made several ''memorable'' photos of what i have said..TILL TO THIS DAY..those hippies from the 60''s who redefined themselves as liberals are still vicious, unfiathfull and suspicious of those men that wears that uniform. THAT IS WHAT IS INGRAINED IN THIER MINDS..

speaking of recent proverbial ''soldier spitting''..berkley not long ago, physically hindered operations in a recruiting office..post from the most rabid left winged cbs liberals is a quick snap shot of that kind of mentality.

for those berkley liberals..the marines now are the same marines then..nothing but babykillers..

[rltw175b]

THAT WHAT WE GET WHEN YOU HAVE A BUSH AS PRESIDENT!!

Posted by Xlib: "your explanation of the meaning of "carrot &stick" is a bit flawed. See, the handler holds a carrot that has been tied to the end of the stick and holds it in front of the donkey, horse, whatever to get him to do what he wants. That would usually be pulling a plow or wagon. So, the stick IS NOT meant tobe a weapon of punishment, not at all."
----
That is the funniest explanation of "carrot and stick" I have ever heard. The mixed metaphor of "speak softly and carry a big, big, big stick" with the "carrot and the stick" zipped by someone''s head, that''s for sure. Probably aboard one of those Russian bombers.

[talkingham]

Hey Ubrew12 U are such a jerk. Just how much time have you spent in the military? Where did you train, what unit were U in- what is or was your MOS?

U are probably the typical neocon chicken hawk. I served in the Vietnam era and like most liberals called did my duty you A hole. Didn''t spit on single fellow soldier because for the most part soldiers are smart enough to know when they''ve been had by a bunch of chickens perfectly happy to waste their lives so that big oil or the Halliburtons of the world can make the power grab of the ages.

Ubrew12, I spit on your on your braindead brain.

[xlib]

rafterman1-fannie mae and freddie mac are government backed agencies, or didn''t you know that??

[xlib]

Say, would this be another Cuban missle crisis like way, way back in the early 60''s?? Any of you libs remember that or has that been cut out of our history like so many things. Anyway, since the empty suit is trying so, so, so hard to remind us of JFK, can''t wait to see how he hanles it. Well, as a matter of fact I bet he could stand on Key West, Fla and have a big, big stick with a carrot on the end all the way to Cuba.
rafferman1-your explanation of the meaning of "carrot &stick" is a bit flawed. See, the handler holds a carrot that has been tied to the end of the stick and holds it in front of the donkey, horse, whatever to get him to do what he wants. That would usually be pulling a plow or wagon. So, the stick IS NOT meant tobe a weapon of punishment, not at all.

[vietnam21]

time to scrap the UN and NATO,,,

they are both worthless huge wastes of money,,,

Posted by terrorislamt at 02:54 PM : Jul 24, 2008

YEP.

[rosieod4prez]

Castro - just die, ok. Just drop dead, you old commie.

[ubrew12]

libsluv2spit said: "you can redefine history all you want just like the french but liberals ARE INFAMOUS for that [spitting on troops]..why are you ashamed of it now? "

It was excessive and shameful, but not a reason to tar liberals today. For a modern day problem, consider that San Francisco may rename it''s municipal dump after George Bush. I think that''s shameful, and wish the liberals in SF would just grow up. Such an attitude recalls conservative''s successful attempts to impeach Clinton for lying about cheating on his wife. I was deeply ashamed that MY TAX DOLLARS could be used on such a cheap trick. Clinton may have demonstrated personal immorality, but Ken Starr demonstrated contempt for ALL americans with that one.

[ubrew12]

libsluv2spit said: "liberals is creating a society in which the people are dependent on the state "

We''re all dependent on the state anyway, and NONE more so than those who live in the Red States (I have statistics to back this up if you want to see them). Nevertheless, I''d be more sympathetic to Republican calls for self-reliance, if Republican Congressmen has exercized self-reliance in cutting government spending when they were cutting taxes. Instead, they RAISED gov''t spending, and now we''re stuck with a $10 trillion debt-albatross around our necks (as if the example of Reagans-folly wasn''t enough, Bush repeats it!).

Oh, and by the way, it was CARTER that armed the Afghan Mujahadeen against the Russians, embroiling them in their own private Vietnam, and hastening the end of the Soviet Union. He did much more (and more inexpensively) in that regard than REAGAN ever did.

[libsluv2spit]

An author did a study of the "spitting at soldiers" phenomenon. He ended up writing a book about it. And the truth is, the famous spitting at soldiers incidents of the Vietnam war were extremely rare. But the conservative leadership at the time lpayed it up to garner sympathy for the Vietnam war. But the truth is, spitting at soldiers rarely happened. It was non-existent with women.

Of course, hiding behind american soldiers and hypocritically wrapping themselves in the flag are what defines a conservative.

Posted by libsluv2spit


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by rafterman1 at 03:00 PM : Jul 24, 2008
+ report abuse


*************
yeah right!..ever been in a berkley? you can redefine history all you want just like the french but liberals ARE INFAMOUS for that..why are you ashamed of it now?

[libsluv2spit]

"liberals is ....?" Of course the only thing that GOPigs are intent on regulating is what goes on in your bedroom. Personally I''''d rather have a few banks under the government thumb than my ssexx life.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by NewTagAgain at 02:56 PM : Jul 24, 2008
+ report abuse


***********

what regulation is that??

and of course we all know that THEE most important thing for a liberal is what goes on between thier legs than the benefit of society..

[erasmus81]

"You do know what he means by carrots and sticks, right? A balanced mix of diplomacy (carrots) and military force (sticks) to get what we want. What''''s the problem with that?" Posted by rafterman1 at 02:43 PM : Jul 24, 2008

Oh! I didn''t realize that "sticks" meant "military force". Sorry. Anyways, I still don''t think Obama will make a good president. He strikes me that he is a bit on the "wimpy" side, and won''t be able to do what needs to be done.