Comments on: Iranian Oil Minister Warns Against Attack

Tehran Would "React Fiercely" To A Strike From The U.S. Or Israel

Add a Comment See all 165 Comments
by samsel3 July 2, 2008 5:52 PM EDT
The Bush administration is trying to stop a new Natural gas deal between Iran and Italy. Next to Russia Iran has the second largest supply of natural gas. The new pipeline will move several billion cubic feet per day across Turkey and then either Greece or Albania. The gas export to Europe is being strongly opposed by Bush & Cheney as it does''''nt fit in with their master energy plans.
China Dai;ly December 25, 2007

January 24,2008 India announced a plan for a 2,775 km Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline. Union Petroleum Minister Murli Deora said, "Iranian ambassador spoke to me tuesday and they are very keen that the project takes shape as it is in the interest of all three countries ". Times of India
Reply to this comment
by samsel3 July 2, 2008 5:51 PM EDT
In an interview published by the French, dedefensa.org journalist Amy Goodman''''s interview with General Wesley Clark. Clark stated he viewed a defense department memo that described how the U.S. was going to take out seven countries in five years...."starting with Iraq,then Syria and Lebanon, then Libya,then Somalia and Sudan, and back to Iran."

Reply to this comment
by vortex1001 July 2, 2008 5:49 PM EDT
Before u blame the President, look how many Jewish are in the congress. They don''''t care if our American solders are dying for them.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by vietnam21 at 02:13 PM : Jul 02, 2008"

who put those Jews in Congress ??? the same assh0les that put the President in office - so let''s assign the blame where it ultimately belongs - with the ******* american people
Reply to this comment
by jlagat July 2, 2008 5:22 PM EDT
liberalme you''''''''''''''''re an appeaser,and a coward!!

Posted by underdogus10

Do you know what appeasement is? Appeasement means giving another country something they want in the hope they will not use military force in some other area. Where do you see anyone talking appeasement?

Posted by elz523 at 01:41 PM : Jul 02, 2008

North Korea.
Bush, he surrendered.
The end.
Reply to this comment
by genesis15-2009 July 2, 2008 5:14 PM EDT
It is cowardly for a fascist corporate run military to use high tech weapons on a third world country that did nothing to us. It is cowardly to release bombs from planes on innocent civilians in crowded cites. Shame on the United States!!!!!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by noloyalisti

No it is not!!! Bomb their *** and pity no one.
Reply to this comment
by vietnam21 July 2, 2008 5:13 PM EDT
Israel, Bush, it''''s time to talk about getting tough on Iran, that should keep those oil prices going in the right direction.

THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!!

Posted by lochlan

Before u blame the President, look how many Jewish are in the congress. They don''t care if our American solders are dying for them.
Reply to this comment
by vietnam21 July 2, 2008 5:02 PM EDT
It is cowardly for a fascist corporate run military to use high tech weapons on a third world country that did nothing to us. It is cowardly to release bombs from planes on innocent civilians in crowded cites. Shame on the United States!!!!!


Posted by noloyalisti

Because of Jewish in the Congress.
Reply to this comment
by still-here2 July 2, 2008 5:00 PM EDT
They would react exactly as they are now.
Reply to this comment
by tbweb July 2, 2008 4:52 PM EDT
Hezbollah and Hamas. Israel would be defending themselves, not attacking without provocation.

Posted by Still-Here2 at 01:44 PM : Jul 02, 2008,,,

Irans Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said in an interview yesterday he would consider an attack by Israel an attack by the U.S.! How would Iran react if Israel considered an attack by Iran sponsored Hamas and Hezzbollah an attack by Iran? That knife cuts both ways!
Reply to this comment
by still-here2 July 2, 2008 4:46 PM EDT
Are the Iranians threatening to attack the nuclear facilities of Israel, the U.S., or anyone else?

No, they are not.

Posted by FeelFree4U at 01:13 PM : Jul 02, 2008


No, no of course not. Iran has never had a harsh word or threat for Israel. LOL
Reply to this comment
by still-here2 July 2, 2008 4:44 PM EDT
Hezbollah and Hamas. Israel would be defending themselves, not attacking without provocation.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti July 2, 2008 4:44 PM EDT
It is cowardly for a fascist corporate run military to use high tech weapons on a third world country that did nothing to us. It is cowardly to release bombs from planes on innocent civilians in crowded cites. Shame on the United States!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by lochlan-2009 July 2, 2008 4:43 PM EDT
Quick Haliburton, sell some more centrifuges to Iran, the value of oil dropped a dollar. Israel, Bush, it''s time to talk about getting tough on Iran, that should keep those oil prices going in the right direction.

THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by elz523 July 2, 2008 4:41 PM EDT
liberalme you''''''''re an appeaser,and a coward!!

Posted by underdogus10

Do you know what appeasement is? Appeasement means giving another country something they want in the hope they will not use military force in some other area. Where do you see anyone talking appeasement?
Reply to this comment
by still-here2 July 2, 2008 4:41 PM EDT
Why oh why did we give up the neutron bomb?
Reply to this comment
by feelfree4u July 2, 2008 4:29 PM EDT

Re: "Try reading this. What Iran is doing is a criminal act."

Posted by captalistpig


Looks like you are the one that needs to read it. I am not a fan of nuclear fission power production, but the Iranians are perfectly within their rights to develop nuclear power under the NPT.

Conversely, the Israelis, with their illegal nukes, and the U.S., having been the only country in history to mass murder a civilian population with nuclear weapons, and who has actively undermined the NPT, have no standing to point fingers at anyone.

Obviously, if anyone needs to be bombed in order to curb the threat of nuclear weapons proliferation, it is Israel.

Israeli extremist leaders constantly threaten and attack their neighbors, and have only contempt for the rule of law.

It''s time to cut the chord with the collapsing, rogue, terror/welfare-State of Israel. They have run amok.
Reply to this comment
by captalistpig July 2, 2008 4:19 PM EDT
-FeelFree4U-

http://www.un.org/events/npt2005/npttreaty.html

Try reading this. What Iran is doing is a criminal act.
Reply to this comment
by liberalme July 2, 2008 4:18 PM EDT
liberalme you''''re an appeaser,and a coward!!

Posted by underdogus10

Oh? And just how do you know that?--An appeaser? how?

And how am I a coward?
Reply to this comment
by beehive21-2009 July 2, 2008 4:14 PM EDT
The time has arrived, George, fire it up,do something before you leave as the worst, President ever. Kick some but.Terminate the Big Mouths ,asap.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree4u July 2, 2008 4:13 PM EDT

Are the Iranians threatening to attack the nuclear facilities of Israel, the U.S., or anyone else?

No, they are not.

It is plain to see who the belligerent and criminal aggressors are in this instance, and it ain''t the Iranians.
Reply to this comment
See all 165 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Iran OKs 10 New Uranium Enrichment Sites

    (289 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: