Comments on: Saddam Feared Getting AIDS In Prison

Excerpts Published Of Iraqi Dictator's Prison Writings While In U.S. Custody

[jetlizhan]

hey saddam, i just dropped the soap - can ya get it for me buddy??!! lol

[honestabe8]

Saddam would have gotten AIDS if he had hung around a bit longer...but they had to eventually cut him down

[mudrose-2009]

Posted by kittykatty2

Then why don''t you copy and paste yourself on somebody''s azz. What have you contributed to this site other than your sarcasm and stupidity?

[mudrose-2009]

Yeah, another born loser speaks out about comparisons of Hilter and the U.S. Go on the Daily Kos and Huffington Post. Your buddies are shouting for you.

Posted by mudrose

I dont think it is a legitimate comparison either, although this war was one of the biggest mistakes the USA ever made. And probably the one the cost us the most respect.
Posted by fibonacci

Our position around the world is better today than it was with Clinton. We have a new France, Germany and other countries that are coming on board as a result of an expansion of NATO. The old line Chirac and Schroeder who is now working for the Russians were very much involved in the food-for-oil back pocket peddling. Saadam was a perceived threat to the nation after 9/11. Too bad the fool didn''t come clean when he was given the opportunity -- that was what 12 years worth. And too bad the Clintoon, who I am now happy to hear from the Hil, will not have an office in the White House, who pandered to police action didn''t defend the nation when WTC I happened and when we were attacked abroad.

[fibonacci_]

Yeah, another born loser speaks out about comparisons of Hilter and the U.S. Go on the Daily Kos and Huffington Post. Your buddies are shouting for you.

Posted by mudrose

I dont think it is a legitimate comparison either, although this war was one of the biggest mistakes the USA ever made. And probably the one the cost us the most respect.

[kittykatty2]

Xlib---I am absolutely positive that the government was behind the experiments on the black population in the years identified...not only the experiments on the Tusk. airmen but also the sterilization of young, black females, undesirable black females and I don''t doubt that there have been many many more atrocities against non-white Americans. As for the anthrax...again, yes, I believe it was the government...and more particularly this administration. As to your question about which party was in power during any given disaster...XLib...I don''t care which party was in power. Repubs, Libs, whoever...they are ALL the same they just wearing different disguises. I''m not a conspiracty theorist, I''m a realist. I know for a fact that Governments create disasters...as for who controls this country''s leaders...well, I''m sure you''re as aware of that as I am.

[mudrose-2009]

Hitler proceeded to invade Poland because Poland initially refused to allow Germany access to the city of Danzig. Danzig was a port-city on the Baltic Sea, mudrose...you are the imbecile...and it would appear a totally ignorant and racist imbecile at that.

Posted by kittykatty2

Yeah, another born loser speaks out about comparisons of Hilter and the U.S. Go on the Daily Kos and Huffington Post. Your buddies are shouting for you.

[fibonacci_]

Maybe he was afraid of dropping the soap and having some big lusty guy doin the hop-jop skick-skock with him.

[kittykatty2]

mudrose...you are the imbecile...and it would appear a totally ignorant and racist imbecile at that.

[xlib]

kittykat-who was the party in power during the experiments?????? Are you absolutely sure about the antrax? Last I knew they never caught them. If they were Americans were they part of the government?
If you enjoy consipracy theories may I tell you about a book "The Third Terrorist5". It''s about the Oklahoma City bombing. Very interesting. Ever wonder why Nichols got executed so quickly?? I sure did. Loved Waco too, a truly inspiring time in our history.

[mudrose-2009]

THERE IS NOTHING DIFFERENT BETWEEN THE NAZI INVASION OF POLAND IN 1939 AND THE BUSHIT NEOCON INVASION OF IRAQ IN 2003

You are absolutely right.
Posted by trueamerica4

And you are absolutely brain dead like bluestar poop.

[trueamerica4]

THERE IS NOTHING DIFFERENT BETWEEN THE NAZI INVASION OF POLAND IN 1939 AND THE BUSHIT NEOCON INVASION OF IRAQ IN 2003

You are absolutely right.

[mudrose-2009]

THERE IS NOTHING DIFFERENT BETWEEN THE NAZI INVASION OF POLAND IN 1939 AND THE BUSHIT NEOCON INVASION OF IRAQ IN 2003
Posted by bluestardad

Oh, there''s a big difference and the fact that you are unable to see it only makes you all the more mentally and ethically deficient. You are a disgrace to even call yourself bluestardad. What you are is an imbecile and a left wing nut. Go on the Daily Kos and post your ********* there. Maybe Huffington Post would suit you better.

[mudrose-2009]

Wow so I guess Ahmie of Iran was wrong. Apparently there are homos in the Middle East.

[kittykatty2]

guyfrompa45...the US did not use wmd''s against it''s own people??? No, you think not? Who the hell do you think was mailing out anthrax after 9/11? AMERICANS you dumbazz. Who do you think conducted experiments on black AMERICANS in the 40''s, 50''s and 60''s? AMERICAN GOVERNMENT you dumbazz. Get a clue.

[extremophil]

I wonder what Saddam is fearing in HE11 right now?

[kittykatty2]

fred90210...finally, a sane voice amongst all of these hateful "christians"

THERE IS NOTHING DIFFERENT BETWEEN THE NAZI INVASION OF POLAND IN 1939 AND THE BUSHIT NEOCON INVASION OF IRAQ IN 2003
Posted by bluestardad at 08:04 AM : May 06, 2008

Wow...you truly are a nutcase. Why don''t you try actually reading a history book before spouting your hate filled armchair ideas?

[bluestardad]

THERE IS NOTHING DIFFERENT BETWEEN THE NAZI INVASION OF POLAND IN 1939 AND THE BUSHIT NEOCON INVASION OF IRAQ IN 2003!

START WAR CRIMES TRIALS NOW!

AMERICA STAND UP OR SHUT UP!

[fred90210]

"He lost all rights when he didn''t allow the United Nations to come in and search the country for weapons of mass destruction. If he had nothing to hide, why did he only allow them in certain places?"

The USA has WMDs, more than any other country in the world. The USA would absolutely NOT allow the United Nations to "come in and search the country for weapons of mass destruction"! Does that mean that WE should be invaded and bombed to bits by the UN? You people are absolutely re.tarded!

BTW, the USA "was not co-operating with the United Nations"! The USA was behaving "like a little kid", unwilling to wait for the UN inspections process to complete. No WMDs were ever found, even though Rumsfeld told us all that he knew "exactly where they were"! There weren''t ANY.

Iraq did NOT attack the USA. Iraq COULD NOT attack the USA. We murdered all those Iraqi people for NOTHING!