Comments on: U.S. Wins Over NATO On Missile Defense
Endorsement A Victory For Bush; Russia Remains Opposed To Weapons System
Add a Comment See all 170 Comments
- hillaryin012,,,, Tell me, who''s it a victory for ?? Why do they need a missle defense in the 1st place, against each other ???
It''s a victory for Defense Contractors & that''s all - Reply to this comment
- Here is what is really happening. Bush is asking for increased military support for Afghanistan, because he broke our military and has it stretched way too thin to fight the war on terror because of his invasion and never ending occupation of Iraq.
He wants NATO countries to boost their efforts in Afghanistan, but they want something in return.
So he''s created this unnecessary waste of tax payers money, to just throw them BILLIONS of dollars. It isn''t for anything we need - he''s just funneling our money around to serve his purpose. Kind of like how he funnels our money directly to Haliburton, KBR, Blackwater, etc, etc.
He doesn''t do anything above board - everything has to be a shady, under handed deal. That''s all this is - a big, fat, American tax payer funded, kickback.
And all for something that we don''t need, and infuriates another world superpower. - Reply to this comment
- Wasted Tax Dollars that have Aided the Enemy -
Ended up going to an American who sold Cold War Ammo to Afhaganistan military & police
Went to over half of the military contracts for poorly tested body armor.
Could have paid for much more progress in the War on Terror
------------ On And On It Goes ------------- - Reply to this comment
- Wasted Tax Dollars that have Aided the Enemy -- Could have provided oversight to prevent dual purpose exports from being sold to countries like Dubai who then send them to insurgents making road side bombs.
- Reply to this comment
- its being based off of all your posts...you arent the sharpest knife in drawer are you?
Posted by jamesm12341 at 02:46 PM : Apr 03, 2008
In response to my criticism of the potential waste of billions of dollars of tax payer money, on a system that won''t do anything to protect America, hitleryin012 said that I was siding with the enemy. It wasn''t the sum of my posts - it was in response to this one issue.
So again - how is my opposition to the fraudulent waste of billions of dollars, siding with the enemy?
And actually, bin Laden said that he hoped that our economy would collapse due to the threat from terrorist attacks, and it looks like Bush is aiding bin Laden''s plans.
Wouldn''t that mean that Bush is siding with the terrorists? - Reply to this comment
- Explain it then. What is it going to do for America, other than waste billions of dollars.
Your answer should be entertaining, if nothing else.
Posted by hungry1968 at 02:29 PM : Apr 03, 2008
So why do you always take sides with the enemy? Do you admire them because you hate Bush?
Posted by hillaryin012 at 02:37 PM : Apr 03, 2008
How is my opposition to BILLIONS of wasted tax dollars, "siding with the enemy"? - Reply to this comment
- Its called a deterrent lib or have you forgottin the Cold War already? Lots of good lessons learned if you were paying attention lib.
Posted by hillaryin012 at 02:39 PM : Apr 03, 2008
Who exactly are we detering, and from what are we allegedly deterring them?
Also, name one good lesson we learned from the cold war. - Reply to this comment
- What''s the big choice here Bush Lovers ??
Support the Troops, Put them back in the War on Terror, it''s what they are trained for, not babysitting Iraqi troops they have little trust in, or driving Convoy''s for KBR - Reply to this comment
- In case Oberman from PMSMSNBC didn%u2019t tell you that the Iranians launched two satellites last year? In case you don%u2019t know anything about ballistics, if you can put a satellite in orbit you can hit another country. Conventional or Nuclear, take your choice lib.
Posted by hillaryin012 at 02:34 PM : Apr 03, 2008
Well, let''s hope they have better intel and aim than Bush and Cheney... - Reply to this comment
- In case Oberman from PMSMSNBC didn%u2019t tell you that the Iranians launched two satellites last year? In case you don%u2019t know anything about ballistics, if you can put a satellite in orbit you can hit another country. Conventional or Nuclear, take your choice lib.
So why do you always take sides with the enemy? Do you admire them because you hate Bush?
Posted by hillaryin012 at 02:37 PM : Apr 03, 2008
AGAIN -- who exactly do you think that Iran is going to attack? - Reply to this comment
- you said it... i didn''''t....first thing i agree with you on tho
Posted by jamesm12341 at 02:35 PM : Apr 03, 2008
If the only way you can win a discussion, is to cut my post up, then what does that say about the strength of your debate? - Reply to this comment
- In case Oberman from PMSMSNBC didn%u2019t tell you that the Iranians launched two satellites last year? In case you don%u2019t know anything about ballistics, if you can put a satellite in orbit you can hit another country. Conventional or Nuclear, take your choice lib.
Posted by hillaryin012 at 02:34 PM : Apr 03, 2008
So who exactly do you think that Iran is going to attack? - Reply to this comment
- What''s the big choice here Bush Lovers ??
An Iraq that can stand up on its own with our support ?? --- Or, an Iraq with growing insurgencies against the occupation & a government that can''t stand up ?? - Reply to this comment
- Look lib, its not going to happen. Youve hinged your whole life on this Iraq thing. Its not going to cost the election for McCain and will probably cause you great distress over it. I just hope you can get ahold of yourself before you go to far. Remember McVey? He beleived his own lies to lib. Dont let it happen to you.
Posted by hillaryin012 at 02:30 PM : Apr 03, 2008
Funny that you''re now idolizing a home grown terrorist - it must ring familiar with you.
McCain is done because of Iraq. - Reply to this comment
- Remember McVey? He beleived his own lies to lib. Dont let it happen to you.
Posted by hillaryin012 at 02:30 PM : Apr 03, 2008
Hope you won''t pull a McVey when McAint LOSES. We''d hate to lose YOU too. Ha!Ha!Ha! - Reply to this comment
- What''s the big choice here Bush Lovers ??
Progressive ?? -- Or, Regressive More of the Same continued National Security destruction & a Weakened Nation & a Lost War on Terror ??? - Reply to this comment
- there is nothing that this country can do that will please you...you are an habitual whiner...you need to go get help.....fast!!
Posted by jamesm12341 at 02:25 PM : Apr 03, 2008
Why Jimmie boy? Then YOU wouldn''t have anything to whine about. Think about it. It''ll come to you eventually. - Reply to this comment
- yet you libs spend so much energy bashing him...if there is no chance he will win....move on to some other topic
Posted by jamesm12341 at 02:26 PM : Apr 03, 2008
Okay - just for you. His wife looks like Cruella DeVille. - Reply to this comment
- Only in your mind lib, Only in your mind......
Posted by hillaryin012 at 02:26 PM : Apr 03, 2008
Explain it then. What is it going to do for America, other than waste billions of dollars.
Your answer should be entertaining, if nothing else. - Reply to this comment
- Go GW Go !! STAY THE COURSE, You still the Man !!!
- Reply to this comment
International recording artist Shakira on love, career and more.
