Comments on: U.S. Missile Strike Hits Town In Somalia

Attack Aimed At Al Qaeda Suspect; Officials Say 8 People Seriously Injured

Add a Comment See all 345 Comments
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 1:53 AM EST
michaelt302,,,, Amigo, you are totally out to lunch on terrorism issues ---- Jihad Watch should be taken off the net..... It''s nothing but pro-zioinst hate & failes to keep up with the many regional changes.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 1:47 AM EST
jackie0428,,, Jihad Watch is about as right wing pro zionist as it gets.... Keep that in mind, it''s a terrible source on any information on terorism.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 1:44 AM EST
jackie0428,,, You should stay away from sites like Jihad watch...... It''s a **** poor source for unbiased terrorist information.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 1:40 AM EST
MyIDonCBS,,,, Do you rembember the Isreali Raid on Entebbe ??? That''s what the Israeli''s learned aslo. Killing one results in 10 more better trained.
Reply to this comment
by jackie0428 March 4, 2008 1:40 AM EST
Read and learn:
www.jihadwatch.org
www.thereligionofpeace.com
www.terrorismawareness.org
www.frontpagemag.com

Reply to this comment
by myidoncbs March 4, 2008 1:27 AM EST
Some truly ign.orant person said, "One thing I DO know: when you kill a terrorist, THAT particular guy is NOT going to commit any more terror."

Obviously you''ve never heard of the mythological Hydra. For every head they cut off, TWO grew back!

Killing terrorists will NEVER stop them. The problem can NOT be solved by military force. Only imb.eciles think otherwise.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 1:01 AM EST
Don,,,, That''s why I like to watch CSPAN & these committiee''s in action,,,, I''m fairly sure I watched that one & echoed much of it the next day here.

Yes a few dems did throw a few cheap shots, & repubs didn''t aske him relevent questions, they were either complaining about the need for the committee or trying to butress Bush''s bad policies..
... Obama, as he said asked solid questions, he knows what he''s talking about.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 12:52 AM EST
Don,,,, If your going to throw cheap shots at Obama, please at least give us some facts.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 12:50 AM EST
Don,,,, Start listening to Obama closer & stay away from FOX news or GOP Spin,,,,, I honestly try to filter out the spin.... But I''m not stupid, it''s going to be real hard for anyone to change the system, because that''s just the way our government works....... The lobbyists write the laws.

I want to give him the opertunity to at least start the change, when few others including old system republicans & old system dems won''t.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 12:45 AM EST
Don,,,, If it wasn''t in the article, he didn''t say it, period don''t put words in it he didn''t say..... The impication I got was we have to change the archaic thinking.

"Let me ask you this: how wise have they been? I know your point, but most of these guys are still thinking in archaic terms."
Reply to this comment
by donbl1 March 4, 2008 12:43 AM EST
J, Obama has lobbyists volunteering for free on his team.

Every politician has political debts. Obama will, too.
Reply to this comment
by donbl1 March 4, 2008 12:42 AM EST
J, that was the only thing in 4 pages he said specifically about Obama.

However, he made the comment about the people advising him earlier.

Regardless, we all see different elements in any story. To me, the most important was the opportunity to create wealth and jobs in the desolate tribal regions of Pakistan and Afghanistan.

To me, jobs are an important element of calming the region.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 12:40 AM EST
Don,,,, Obama is the only canidate in either party who has been steadfast on changing just that old problem ----- McCain is in so deep, Lobbyists run both his campaign & Senate office, & that''s not a joke.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 12:38 AM EST
Don,,,, I think you might want to go back & pull up the article.... He gave Obama a lot of good credit.

"His questions were not only precise and deep, but the courtesy and respect he afforded me in that forum I was grateful for. He didn''t have to do that. It wasn''t necessary, but he listened; he asked good questions. I don''t want to read too much into that encounter, but it made a positive impression on me." [Crumpton considers himself an independent.
Reply to this comment
by donbl1 March 4, 2008 12:35 AM EST
J, all politicians are just that and have their sponsors they owe. Sometimes those sponsors are good people and sometimes they embarrass you.

Obama will have political payoffs to do if he wins just the same as all politicians. That is why people work for politicians. Clinton was the same way.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 12:34 AM EST
Don,,,, If I read it correctly, he was saying there are better ways of handling Iraq, Afhaganistan & Iran than we have been,,

"Let me ask you this: how wise have they been? I know your point, but most of these guys are still thinking in archaic terms." he said. ------- I think he''s talking of McCain''s archaic "Stay the Course" & "Bomb bomb Iran"
Reply to this comment
by donbl1 March 4, 2008 12:31 AM EST
J, no one is doubting his intelligence as Columbia and Harvard are (usually) pretty good indicators. However, he does need rapid growth in experience and the only way he can get that in the short time he has is from advisors'' coaching.

America will give Obama his grade in the General Election debates which will be much more specific and harder than the primary debates.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 12:29 AM EST
Don,,,, Don''t for one moment Obama will get in & do what Bush did, appoint his Texas political hacks & ENRON people to the advisor positions. ---- Obama is a hell of a lot smarter & less political than Bush or McCain
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 12:27 AM EST
Don,,,, I didn''t get that at all from the article
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman March 4, 2008 12:24 AM EST
Don,,,, Obama knows what he''s doing, he asked the deep important questions & it was only a sub-committee.

When you say deep questions, what%u2014
The nature of the enemy, what is their motivation? The kind of questions he ought to be asking. What''s driving the enemy, and what''s the enemy strategy? We didn''t get into this in the testimony, but this goes back to Sun Tzu: you''ve got to know what the enemy''s strategy is and attack the strategy. You don''t just attack the enemy. You don''t just attack IEDs. He was trending in that direction. And I didn''t get a lot of questions from [other] guys going that way. It was, "How come you haven''t got bin Laden?"
Reply to this comment
See all 345 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: