Comments on: 70 Percent Of Afghanistan Still Lawless
Top Intelligence Officials Say U.S.-Backed Government Controls Just 30 Percent Of Country
- Posted by singingrick at 07:38 PM : Feb 28, 2008
+ report abuse
****
ARE YOU singrick''s idiot alter ego..that very flattering - Reply to this comment
- Basically Bush didn''''t finish the job defeating the Talliban before he went in to Iraq to steal their oil.
Now, the folks who actually were responsible for 9/11 have rebuilt their organization. Bush is a moron and so are his supporters.
lol!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by singingrick at 07:38 PM : Feb 28, 2008
+ report abuse
**************
oh come on..you are not really pass the credit for all the terrorist support the liberals had been graciously giving our enemies?
since day one, the liberal masses are working fevershly to MAKE SURE that they have the chance to organize..hell we cant even look at thier leadership the wrong way without the liberals MAKING EVERY FUSS about "violation of rights"..
SO DOES THIS MEAN WE CAN START CRACKING AL QUEDA SKULLS WITHOUT YOU BITC*HING? - Reply to this comment
Basically Bush didn''t finish the job defeating the Talliban before he went in to Iraq to steal their oil.
Now, the folks who actually were responsible for 9/11 have rebuilt their organization. Bush is a moron and so are his supporters.
lol!- Reply to this comment
- The article title equates anything but Karzai''s control with no control. Amazing. Does anyone have statistics? It is 10 percent Taliban and 30 percent Karzai, right? Aren''t the odds of being murdered lowest in that remaining 60 percent? The murderers are the least well-funded in that area I would imagine. I am sure these authors get a nice kickback from the Pentagon.
- Reply to this comment
- afghanistan is a sh*thole..run by sh*theads..WE ARE LUCKY THAT WE EVEN HAVE 30%.. they started with sh*t..and now they are 30% less shi*tty..
take your aces while you have them - Reply to this comment
- Or we could have gained control of 30% right off the bat, and have gained nothing since then.
In that case, we''''ll be there forever.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hungry1968 at 10:48 AM : Feb 28, 2008
+ report abuse
********
we have the military might and the technology to dominate the middle east..however, what is holding all that back and pretty much render our military half-arsed is that we have to pus sy-foot along this whole war as NOT TO **** OFF THE LIBERALS. hey at least we are at least allowed to shoot at them..but should I give you time to work that out? - Reply to this comment
- Posted by pupeta at 05:08 PM : Feb 28, 2008
+ report abuse
*************
What reagan did was break the backbone of the soviet empire..in result..the soviets can no longer effectively engange in any campaigns in afghanistan.. - Reply to this comment
- At least you''''re willing to admit that Reagan gave the Taliban arms, weapons, training, and intelligence unlike most conservatives.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hungry1968 at 05:06 PM : Feb 28, 2008
+ report abuse
***********
and guess what..we gave saddam hussein weapons too..so that kinda dismiss the ''no wmd'' liberal bruhaha...what reagan was trying to avoid are those pesky liberals WHO WOULD WHINE THEN and it seems who are whinning now..We need to deal with our own wars NO MATTER HOW MUCH THE LIBERAL WOULD WHINE OR ELSE WE WOULD END UP WITH THIS KIND OF MESS...DO YOU AGREE? - Reply to this comment
- "70% of Afghanistan Still Lawless."
Is that a problem for the U.S.?
Is that something that we want to send U.S. troops and money to resolve?
Is that something that the U.S. should sacrifice American and innocent Afghani lives for?
Is that somethinbg that the U.S. should spend millions of dollars to correct?
I think not.
Republicans are scary to me. - Reply to this comment
- libsrweak your military didn''t participate in any of the operations the soviets fought, neither did the CIA. Now if a fat arse 50 years old carrying a suitcase full of money and weapons for your reagan loving taliban counts as a participation than you can say the CIA had something to do with it, but as far as military operations, all the US did in the soviet invasion, was made very good hollywood movies.
- Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




