Comments on: U.N. Report May Prompt New Iran Sanctions

Iranians Protests That The Document Proves Their Nuclear Program Is Peaceful In Nature

[iceman_1960]

"The international consensus that the recent National Intelligence Estimate on Iran was flat-out wrong, and that Iran is still a dangerous threat, is growing."
- Posted by AJMarine1 at 11:54 AM : Feb 23, 2008
------------------

There is an even greater international consensus on Global Warming as being a far greater danger to the human race and the entire planet, than Iran could ever be.

Global Warming should be our Number One priority.

[ajmarine1]

Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 01:07 PM : Feb 23, 2008


So, what''s the answer? What does the next President do concerning Iran?

[rowdytexan2]

Bush is just looking for an excuse, any excuse to get into Iran and take us into another quagmire that would keep the war profiteers in money for the next 100 years. And/or give the oil companies control of their oil resources.

I refuse to sit here and support him in his madness. He counts on the American people being afraid.

[ajmarine1]

Now what is the purpose of my sitting here shivering in my boots at the THOUGHT that Iran might develop one weapon?

Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 12:53 PM : Feb 23, 2008

If I was Iran, surrounded by people who had the bomb, I would want the bomb too.

What do I care if they set one off in Israel. My point is that the Middle East has been in a state of semi-war for decades; why not do something that will finish this once and for all, winner take all and deal with it.

Iran, as any state would, will do what is in their best interest. Whoever is elected will have to deal with them somehow, I wonder how it will turn out.

[ajmarine1]

ToolMangler,

In case erasmus6 says anything, I didn''t know you had a thing for her, I won''t do it, flirt with her, again.

[rowdytexan2]

Iran would have to develop two or three nukes...one to blow up Israel, and one or two to defend themselves from others? They can''t just do it with one. How long would it take them to produce that many nukes? Even if that was their intent?

Right now, Iran has about five or six hundred ballistic missiles...if it was their intention to blow up israel...why not just lob a couple of hundred of those over there?

The other issue is that the US of A is sitting on megatons of nuclear (nukler, lol) weapons. We could wipe out Iran in one sweel foop! And our Idiot in Chief is just waiting for an excuse to do it! And Iran knows it! Not even to include the biological weapons we could use just to eliminate the people and not destroy the land.

Now what is the purpose of my sitting here shivering in my boots at the THOUGHT that Iran might develop one weapon?

[ajmarine1]

America and the Russia, China, nor the rest of the world do not need to fear Irans Nooks

Posted by ToolMangler at 12:35 PM : Feb 23, 2008


Afternoon Tool,

IF Iran is making a bomb, I agree that Israel would be the one most likely to be on the receiving end of it. I was wondering about nuclear accidents and fall out like from Chernobyl.

I don''t care if Iran has a bomb or even used it, it''s just that it seems one week they are making a bomb and the next someone says that they are not.........which is it?

[toolmangler-2009]

Ali Larijani, Iran''''s former nuclear negotiator, said that there was no justification for the Security Council''''s concern about Tehran''''s nuclear programme or further sanctions against it.

Yes sir, no need for "concern" here.

Posted by AJMarine1 at 12:03 PM : Feb 23, 2008



America and the Russia, China, nor the rest of the world do not need to fear Irans Nooks. The only nation that is in danger from them is ''Israel''. Iran will develope a nook and use it against Israel on the pretext that they only did what Israel would have done, ''But they did it first''. This will happen under the guise of "Its easier to apologize afterwardm than suffer the first bomb themselves". One or two bombs will totally wipe out Israel, where Iran can withstand many hits before being truly damaged beyond repair. Iran has only one country that they can effectively use a nook against. and that is Israel. I do not support Israel either, but I have to face facts.

[ajmarine1]

Are you scared?

Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 12:26 PM : Feb 23, 2008

I''m too old to be scared Rowdy;......I would say I''m more pissed. But then again, I''m to old to do much about that either.

[rowdytexan2]

Posted by AJMarine1 at 12:03 PM : Feb 23, 2008

Boo! Bush paid me to scare you! Are you scared?

[rowdytexan2]

And comparing Ahmadinejad to Adolph Hitler is like comparing Barney Fife to Kojak.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Iceman_1960 at 11:41 AM : Feb 23, 2008

lol :)

[ajmarine1]

Ali Larijani, Iran''s former nuclear negotiator, said that there was no justification for the Security Council''s concern about Tehran''s nuclear programme or further sanctions against it.



Yes sir, no need for "concern" here.

[ajmarine1]

And today a simulation commissioned by European Union experts has resulted in the conclusion that Iran could have enough enriched uranium for a nuclear bomb by the end of 2008. The Europeans had always been skeptical about the accuracy of the NIE, and now it appears that they are now more certain than ever that Iran poses a nuclear threat.

Our allies agree that Iran is continuing its insane rush for nuclear weapons. And our intelligence community has once again been discredited. It''s time we held our intelligence "professionals" responsible. Investigative hearings need to be called, and everyone needs to be put under oath, from Condi Rice, John Negroponte, Robert Gates, John McConnell, and Michael Hayden, on down.


Part 2

[ajmarine1]

The international consensus that the recent National Intelligence Estimate on Iran was flat-out wrong, and that Iran is still a dangerous threat, is growing.

Israel has always contended that the NIE was wrong, and that Iran''s nuclear weapons program continues.

After Iran launched a space satellite for the first time last week, Russia expressed concerns that the satellite launch vehicle was really just a testbed for a nuclear warhead delivery system.

Just a few days ago, the exiled Iranian opposition group that had previously proven accurate in indicating the location of two Iranian nuclear sites and exposing twenty years of Iranian nuclear activity, revealed that Iran has accelerated its nuclear weapons program and is building a nuclear warhead production facility southeast of Tehran.

Part 1

[iceman_1960]

And comparing Ahmadinejad to Adolph Hitler is like comparing Barney Fife to Kojak.

[iceman_1960]

"ever here of chamberlain???"
- Posted by terrorislam0 at 07:53 AM : Feb 23, 2008
-----------

Ever hear of mental retardation ?

What an idiotic analogy. Nazi Germany was an aggressive military power in the heart of Europe, moving to take over the entire continent.

Iran is a pathetic Third World country that hasn"t won a war since 490 B.C., when it was called Persia and got its b*utt kicked by the ancient Greeks.

Every international situation is not just like Nazi Germany in the 1930"s.

[singingrick]

I want my war.

Give me my war now!

I''m bored with Iraq.

I need another war!

[singingrick]

The military is stretched to the breaking point, the treasury is bankrupt but let''s go to war with Iran on a rumor that they are developing WMD''s.

Bring on WW3!

[iceman_1960]

"so..
.............what are you doing for global warming??"
- Posted by libsrc0kskrs at 01:57 AM : Feb 23, 2008
----------------------

I have made many personal sacrifices in the War on Global Warming. For one thing, my personal computer is now wind- and solar-powered. Of course that means I can only use it on hot breezy days, but that"s a small price to pay to keep America and the world safe.

But I''ll tell you what I"m NOT doing for it.

I"m not agitating for a bloody military action that would result in the deaths of thousands of innocent people.

[singingrick]

If we don''t go to war with Iran right now, Jesus won''t come back.

I want my Jihad!

War now!