Comments on: Exile Group: Iran Stepping Up Nuke Program

Opposition Organization Linked To Terror Group Claims Regime Trying To Build Bomb

[killtheliars]

also singinrick,

you are probably aware that Israel as meant in the Bible is not a spacific place but a group of people. Therefore they have not always been protected, the holocaust is proof of that.

[killtheliars]

singinrick,

"-For 3, what "cause???" The Jews aren''''t the ones going around the world blowing themselves up and killing innocent people, hijacking airplanes and all that garbage. That''''s all being done by the Muslim jihadists."
No but they do shoot kids from tanks and gunships for throwing rocks

"-For 2 it''''s a Biblical mandate for us Christians to support the Jews (After all, Jesus Christ IS the King of the Jews)"
And they rejected Him, also I have never seen it written in the Bible that we should support the jews

"The only "cause" that the Jews have is protecting their land of Israel. The Sovereign land of Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East."
If this were the case I would have no problem with them, because I am not a fan of the arabs in the region either, but it is not all they want. They want to prosper off of the resources of the region which they have no right to. They also want to be the power in the middle east, this is why they see Iran as a threat.

I think if both sides destroyed each other the world might be a better place

[killtheliars]

but until they recognize him how can you support thier cause?

[killtheliars]

singinrick,

Then why do you suppost the jews when they voted to have Jesus crucified. Many have tried to wash over this fact by blaming Rome, but if you read the Bible, Pilate gave the jews a choice between a common thief or Jesus Christ. The jews chose to have Christ crucified.

[killtheliars]

RowdyTexan2,

you are probably correct as well. The bottom line is Israel seems to feel they have a right to middle eastern oil, and water for that matter, even though none of it is on or under the ground they wanted so badly. They wanted Saddam out so the pipeline from N. Iraq could be built, they want Syria and Lebanon out because they do not want to do business with Israel (and any country has a right to not do business with any other country)and therefore will not allow pipelines to ru through or off the cosst of their countries.
Read "oil and Israel"
http://www.sandersresearch.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1118&Itemid=63
personally my belief is if you don''t live on it you don''t have a right to it unless those that do own it wish to sell it to you. Therefore the only natural resource Israel has any right to would be sand. They could go inot the glass business.

[rowdytexan2]

Posted by killtheliars at 12:04 PM : Feb 21, 2008

I would tend to agree with that. There is certainly a tie to something...my first suspect was money...

[rowdytexan2]

Again, let''''s not get into this again Rowdy. You''''re hypocrisy on this subject has already been completely EXPOSED.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by singinrick at 11:57 AM : Feb 21, 2008

Sorry, Singinrick, I choose to live in a real world, and I most certainly follow the teachings of Jesus Christ of Nazreth. But I do not simply read the words and spew them out like absolutes. Words themselves are meaningless, unless you act according to the beliefs you get out of them.

[killtheliars]

I bet these exile groups have ties to Israel

"Closed hearing and a secret ruling: how the word Israel was deleted
The battle over the Iraq dossier draft has followed a familiar pattern of Whitehall attempts to block freedom of information requests.

When a researcher first applied to the Foreign Office for the release of the draft dossier, it turned the request down. The ministry then failed to conduct the required internal appeal against its decision.

Its next move was to try to persuade the information commissioner, Richard Thomas, that the document - including the word "Israel" - was exempt under section 36 of the Freedom of Information Act, concerning free and frank discussion."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/feb/21/freedomofinformation.foreignpolicy

[quetzal0666]

Ricky your hijacking the posts again,
The headline is about Iran, not about Jeorge Washington Pandering to his Religious base upon taking the oath of office.......

[rowdytexan2]

Once again, Singinrick, you try to write history according to your extremist beliefs.