Comments on: New Sanctions On Iran For Nukes

Measure Falls Short Of What Bush Administration Wanted

Add a Comment See all 57 Comments
by forthepeopl1 January 22, 2008 10:29 PM EST
i hope iran puts one right up bushes a/s/s and cheney and rice. they started this mess and its time someone puts a end to it
Reply to this comment
by damnedrelign January 22, 2008 10:13 PM EST
It''s the unspoken and unwritten, well-known intelligence info [regarding the mad, hell-bent, objectives to procure nuclear weapons which the Iranian leader''s who are intoxicated with warped and dangerous delusions of power, revenge/punishment and conquest] that the international community should be concerned with !
All pro-active measures to interrupt AND TO COMPLETELY ELIMINATE the clear, the certain, and present danger of Iran''s nuclear development must be applied, and that includes major, pre-emptive military action.
Given the extremely dangerous, demented, religious mindset of the Iranian leadership, such appropriate measures should be taken without further delay.
Reply to this comment
by baghdadshere January 22, 2008 9:21 PM EST
A preemptive attack on Irans nuclear plants is the only solution for this situation. Iran hides its nuclear weapons program and if we wait any more to take an action it might be too late.
Reply to this comment
by denn034 January 22, 2008 8:42 PM EST
Iran''s incendiary rhetoric, threatening Israel, and cozying up with Chavez argues against a peaceful intent so, I''m glad to see these sanctions imposed.
Reply to this comment
by denn034 January 22, 2008 8:33 PM EST
Glad to see these sanctions being imposed. Ahmadinejad''s incendiary rhetoric, threatening Israel, and visiting Chavez in Venezuela argues against a peaceful intent.
Reply to this comment
by denn034 January 22, 2008 8:30 PM EST
I once posted on this site that uranium enrichment proved that Iran''s nuclear ambitions hadn''t ended. I didn''t understand at the time that uranium has grades of enrichments from standard for power only and the most enriched weapons grade for for nukes. I regret that. I still think that Iran''s Ahmadinejad''s incendiary rhetoric and his visiting with Chavez in Venezuela argues against Iran''s intentions being peaceful.
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica January 22, 2008 7:40 PM EST
The "draft"? Administration "victory"?

Why didn''t anybody tell me they changed the meaning of the word "draft" in this context to "finished document"?
Reply to this comment
by tomanyt January 22, 2008 7:18 PM EST
More sanctions...that will work!
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica January 22, 2008 7:15 PM EST
However, Iran has remained defiant, insisting it has never had a nuclear weapons program and saying its work is for peaceful purposes such as energy production.

What a bunch of Lying Lizards. They had a nuclear program and broke it up into smaller pieces. It''s still on going. I''m all for giving them some weapons grade nuclear material, in the form they wish to create. Bomb bomb bomb, bomb Iran!
Reply to this comment
by Con Mohrat January 22, 2008 5:46 PM EST
.
Reply to this comment
See all 57 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Does dad need a nursing home? Dr. LaPook talks with a geriatrician about navigating a difficult decision.
Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lieberman May Torpedo Health Care Reform

    (243 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: