Comments on: Pakistan Elections Likely To Be Delayed
Sources Tell CBS News Vote Will Wait 4-9 Weeks; New Video Raises Doubts About Cause Of Bhutto's Death
- ilikecats1,,,,, Thanks bro, now I know who to throw all the lemmon flashlights at I''ve kept in ght garage
- Reply to this comment
- Political assasinations are never effective. Those leaders always have numerous followers. When a leader is removed by a constitutional election, they are forgotten quickly, but when a leader is removed by political assasination, they are remembered far longer. The story of deprivation is a family value that is passed down as a strong value that bonds civil people together. It teaches people to survive the unexpected or least welcomed events. All stories about survival are resiliant in the civil world.
- Reply to this comment
- I wonder if Musharraf will have a ''Mission Accomplished'' banner behind him when he announces the delay in elections.
- Reply to this comment
- "He is a one man calamity," former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif told reporters.
That brightened my day considerably...a foreign dignitary using a quote like that and they were NOT talking about Bush. - Reply to this comment
- It is silly to think an election is going to alter the fact that Pakistan is a Muslim fundamentalist nation.
That''''s why it broke away from India in the first place.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 09:54 AM : Dec 31, 2007
When did Pakistan break away from India? - Reply to this comment
- If her wish was to die, as you contend, why would she protest lack of security? Posted by formrusmcsgt
~~~~
If she was concerned about the lack of security, why didn''t she leave the country? - Reply to this comment
- Maybe the Decider should take a good long look at Pakistan and consider postponing our elections. I sure am going to miss Commander Guy.
http://blancadebree.blogspot.com - Reply to this comment
- She wanted to become a martyr to her cause so her son could step into her shoes. She got her wish.
Posted by barbaraf4 at 08:48 AM : Dec 31, 2007
If her wish was to die, as you contend, why would she protest lack of security? - Reply to this comment
- Bhutto returned to Pakistan, knowing that death was stalking her. From the first day she set foot there in November, her loyal followers were dying as a result of suicide bombers. She wanted to become a martyr to her cause so her son could step into her shoes. She got her wish. It doesn''t matter how she died. She died and in doing so, she unleashed the Muslim fury and chaos that accompanies any slight or transgression - real or imagined.
- Reply to this comment
- Let''''s see.. We went into the Middle East to find and bring to justice a man who ordered an attack on this nation. What is going on? This INSANITY that we are right in the middle of... It''''s unbelievable even for an Arrogant Born Again Southern Nazi!! Sieg Heil Bush
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by MCVet at 07:01 AM : Dec 31, 2007
+ report abuse
You make a very good point Sarge. When you allow people to determine their own way you are able to better manage things like this. When you are responisble for the actions of the parties you can not manage such things. Historically we have been able to help people who want to be free to fight for that freedom but we have not been very successful in "Giving" freedom to people. I just do not know what this administration has been thinking but they are truly arrogant and incompetent. Semper Fi! - Reply to this comment
- Benazir wanted foreign bodyguards but they were refused visas by the Islamabad regime. She named the three people who she thought were out to kill her in an e-mail prior to her execution--one was the official in charge of her security. There are reports that she broke a deal with the CIA and favored negotiations with the Islamists. In one of her last interviews, this one for PARADE magazine, she spoke out against US support for the Musharaff dictaotrship and said it was destroying her country....For news of this and other news on the assassination rense.com and antiwar.com have links to informative articles.
This looks for all the world like a continuation of the New World Order strategy of Problem--Reaction--Solution...The plan is to create both chaos and provide more justification for US involvement in the region. Note, from the articles at the sites listed, that the Afghani president, Karzai, was held back from negotiations by the Washington Regime. It is reported that Bhutto was planning to undertake them.
Note also that the master of the neo-Cons, Leo Strauss, and his followers preached this kind of constant conflict and, under Bush, have turned it into policy...the "hundred years war against terrorism"...he was also a proponent of lie as an instrument of state policy...Where would the Washington Regime be without its lies and its wh*res in the media who spread them like STDs at Subic Bay? - Reply to this comment
- Why was she killed?
Posted by dimmu19 at 06:48 AM : Dec 31, 2007
Until a cause of death is determined, how do we even know she was killed?
The attack might have precipited a heart attack or stroke. - Reply to this comment
- Let''s see.. We went into the Middle East to find and bring to justice a man who ordered an attack on this nation. What is going on? This INSANITY that we are right in the middle of... It''s unbelievable even for an Arrogant Born Again Southern Nazi!! Sieg Heil Bush
- Reply to this comment
- Spurns?? How in the world does a video "spurn" something?? How about using a dictionary, it might help you "spawn" a proper headline.
- Reply to this comment
- Spurns?? How in the world does a video "spurn" something?? How about using a dictionary, it might help you "spawn" a proper headline.
- Reply to this comment
- Why was she killed? Maybe it has to do with what she said in this interview:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIO8B6fpFSQ - Reply to this comment
- "Bhutto''s husband said late Sunday he refused permission for doctors to perform an autopsy, meaning that short of exhuming her body - something her supporters have already ruled out - the cause of her death will be difficult to establish.''
If the husband wants the truth to come out, why would he quash an autopsy?
Did she suffer a heart attack, maybe? - Reply to this comment
- "First, we need to stay out of this affair except in a support role." Posted by ramos937
Excellent ideas, but the fact that Bush and the CIA backed Pervie, and still supports him, in spite of his attempts to abolish democratic reform and become dictator, makes it extremely difficult to avoid being involved, especially if it is proven that Perv''s boyz, or the CIA tool known as Al Qaeda, did it. - Reply to this comment
- I know who did it,, sure enough !! Yip, it has all the right makings and I know who was behind the attack, theres no doubt, and this person has a history of shooting people,, Yip, it was Ol'' Cheney, -- Cheney did it, remember when he was hunting and shot that ol'' boy in the face and neck,, he was just practising for this moment,, it had to be him, he''s the prime suspect I''ll betch ya, Yip, no-doubt about it,, sure enough he''s the smoking gun most likely !!
- Reply to this comment
- In this day and age and no one has proof of how Bhutto died? Give me a break. Now Bhutto''s death will go the way of Kennedy, a total mystery for conspiracy theory''s.
I can understand the husband not wanting doctors to perform an autopsy, but why were the media and other doctors not aloud to see the body and document any findings? Something is not right from both sides. - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




