Comments on: Bhutto's Son, Husband To Lead Party
19-Year-Old Oxford Student Made Symbolic Leader; Father Will Take Effective Control
Add a Comment See all 988 Comments
- FORMER -- I just gave you a source that said they had Stingers. WHat''''s up dude?
Posted by poopusbuttus at 09:22 AM : Dec 30, 2007
OK, poopy. If you think covert wars are conducted buy putting your fingerprints all over them, so be it. I know better. - Reply to this comment
- Correction: I didnt say the Russians had stingers, I said the Mujahadeen did. All of which were supplied by the US.
- Reply to this comment
- HUNGRY -- Have you been reading STRATFOR yet? It does wonders for people without a geo-political clue.
Posted by poopusbuttus at 09:18 AM : Dec 30, 2007
Why would I bother reading a "CIA wannabe" web site?
Did Bush use Stratfor to gather his intelligence on Iraq''s WMD''s? - Reply to this comment
- The Russians didn''''t have anti-tank weaponry and stniger-type anti-A/C weaponry in the 80''''s? Whose leg are you trying to pull here, poopy?
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Rus
sian_weaponry
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by formrusmcsgt
FORMER -- I just gave you a source that said they had Stingers. WHat''s up dude? - Reply to this comment
- We do it all the time. Look at what happened over in Pakistan a few months back. We smoked out some terrorist with another hellfire loaded drone.
And guess what popped up on the news? a fragment of that missile with US writing all over it.
They do it covertly as to not rile up the populous. That''''s why they do it covertly.
Posted by poopusbuttus at 09:15 AM : Dec 30, 2007
No comparison. dubya''s WOT is not covert, it''s overt. - Reply to this comment
- If you think about it, we were the only one''''s that had the equipment to take our their tanks and choppers and such.
Posted by poopusbuttus at 09:13 AM : Dec 30, 2007
The Russians didn''t have anti-tank weaponry and stniger-type anti-A/C weaponry in the 80''s? Whose leg are you trying to pull here, poopy?
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Russian_weaponry - Reply to this comment
- Posted by hungry1968
HUNGRY -- Have you been reading STRATFOR yet? It does wonders for people without a geo-political clue. - Reply to this comment
- You can''''t claim you''''re not involved if weaponry is captured which is produced in your country, exported to the war zone, and has your name stenciled all over it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by formrusmcsgt
We do it all the time. Look at what happened over in Pakistan a few months back. We smoked out some terrorist with another hellfire loaded drone.
And guess what popped up on the news? a fragment of that missile with US writing all over it.
They do it covertly as to not rile up the populous. That''s why they do it covertly. - Reply to this comment
- PAK IT IN, STAN, the ***** of evil, Bushman,
Perverse the sheriff and the army, are running
this here shindig! - Reply to this comment
- FORMER -- I''m not trying to get "One Up" on you. I''m merely pointing out the fact that the US definitely supplied the Mujihadeen during the 80''s with weaponry to combat Soviet Forces.
If you think about it, we were the only one''s that had the equipment to take our their tanks and choppers and such.
But here''s the point that I was trying to make to FLOYD. It''s all a game, and sometimes in that game, mistakes or not, you have to play in what seems to be beneficial to the US security interests around the globe. - Reply to this comment
